Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/27/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended featur
On Jul 27, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/27/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended features are being utilised?
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/27/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended features are being utilised? Putting myself in users shoes, I
would like to use
On 7/27/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended features are being utilised? Putting myself in users shoes, I
would like to use these extensions, but
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended features are being utilised? Putting myself in users shoes, I
would like to use these extensions, but would like a way of identifying
which apps are us
I think it is a benefit to a user. They might be surprised when it doesn't work in another
Appserver. So long as we don't break compliance I think we should keep it.
David Jencks wrote:
As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
extended (or made work) some non-j2ee fu
I think extended functionality is good. As long as it doesn't violate
or break our spec compliance, why not allow it to do more? I am in
support of extended functionality.
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
> As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
> extended (or made work) som
As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I
extended (or made work) some non-j2ee functionality and I wonder if
we want it. I think we do. Lets see if I can describe the
functionality:
ejb-link in a j2ee app is only supposed to work between modules in an
ear.
The
