Re: Single Sign On with Geronimo 1.0

2006-08-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
I could get SSO Working on a server build with SSOValve GBean in the tomcat plan. In this case the application deployment plans needed no change as mentioned in the post that Krish pointed to. Here are some of my observations. An SSOValve GBean created as part of the application needs to be

Re: Single Sign On with Geronimo 1.0

2006-08-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
You are right. By server built with SSOValve, I meant to say it should be part of Tomcat configuration. Thanks, Vamsi On 8/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does the server need to be built with the SSOValve?You should be able to connect the SSOValve to the TomcatEngine in

Re: Single Sign On with Geronimo 1.0

2006-08-07 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Seeing your reply, I have to add the following to my original comments. I have tested SSO with two WebApps deployed as part of an EAR. I do not know if enabling SSO for Web Apps deployed independently requires any changes in their deployment plans. Thanks, VamsiOn 8/7/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL

Re: Single Sign On with Geronimo 1.0

2006-08-07 Thread Jeff Genender
It shouldn't... if you apply the SSOValve at the host or engine levels, then all web apps underneath will then be using the SSOValve via inheritance. Jeff Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Seeing your reply, I have to add the following to my original comments. I have tested SSO with two WebApps