On 2/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I like the idea, but he devil is in the details. Before we move
forward, I'd like to look that devil in he eyes.
Indeed. I don't understand what this would give anyone except a more
Nice idea !! , especially considering all the things we are putting inside Geronimo and the list keeps growing.
If there is a way to do a build withonly what you want in a less painful way then it's great !!!
Thanks,
Rajith
On 2/13/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would folks
On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area
+1
- sachin
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and
I like the idea, but he devil is in the details. Before we move
forward, I'd like to look that devil in he eyes.
-dain
On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that
I think we need Maven2 first before can be effective at making the build more
modular as described here.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:27
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on splitting out core from, well
On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I like the idea, but he devil is in the details. Before we move
forward, I'd like to look that devil in he eyes.
Indeed. I don't understand what this would give anyone except a more
complicated build structure. What I think would be
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area for modules like Jetty, Tomcat,
ActiveMQ, Directory,
I think this is a good idea.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:15:07
To:Geronimo Dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Thoughts on splitting out core from, well, products other stuff
What would folks think of (in principle
On 2/13/2006 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area for
On 2/13/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area
11 matches
Mail list logo