Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-24 Thread James Strachan
, message); } next.send(ctx, message); } public Broker installPlugin(Broker broker) throws Exception { return new VirtualTopicBroker(broker); } } -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-24 Thread bmadigan
Thanks James, looks good. Now I see what was wrong with the wildcard :) Is there a rough release date for the 4.1 codebase? Glad things could come together, Brian Madigan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-24 Thread James Strachan
On 7/24/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks James, looks good. Now I see what was wrong with the wildcard :) :) Is there a rough release date for the 4.1 codebase? No - I'll start a separate thread on releases to try figure out whats left to do to start thinking of doing a 4.1 etc

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-21 Thread bmadigan
-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5439965 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-19 Thread James Strachan
OK I've just added a test case that seems to show that the destinations are being created lazily when a consumer is added... http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/NewConsumerCreatesDestinationTest.java I've tried to

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-19 Thread bmadigan
-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5404863 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-19 Thread James Strachan
On 7/19/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this the change to call lookup(...) in addConsumer( )? Yes Looks like its not being called. Damn - sorry about that. I knew I should have taken the time to write a test case :). Lemme see if I get chance to write a little test case

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-18 Thread bmadigan
consumer being added in addConsumer(..), but after changing it to a Queue type, addConsumer() was only being called for the advisory topic. A little confusing. I'm not going to worry about it.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-18 Thread bmadigan
Destinations for ActiveMQ.Virtual.*.TEST Thanks, Brian Madigan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5385718 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-18 Thread bmadigan
I turned off advisory just to get it out of the way (advisorySupport=false), but it looks like advisory topics are still being created. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5387994 Sent from

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-17 Thread bmadigan
change where I could change this behavior. Any ideas? RegionBroker looks like it does most of the work. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5364439 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-17 Thread bmadigan
Or AbstractRegion.. I think I can get tthis to work without messing up any of the persistence logic. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5364499 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-17 Thread bmadigan
that the last 3 replies were to myself, so you were probably not notified. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5367679 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-17 Thread James Strachan
/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5367679 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com. -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Re: Virtual Topics (was Re: Failover topic subscribers)

2006-07-14 Thread bmadigan
in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Virtual-Topics-%28was-Re%3A-Failover-topic-subscribers%29-tf1942508.html#a5332644 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.