Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-21 Thread David Blevins
You can put it here for now http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ specs/branches/jee5_exp/ When Jason's done with the new spec layout, I'll be working on moving those in to trunk. -David On Aug 20, 2006, at 5:41 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've implemented the jta 1.1 feature locally and

Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-21 Thread David Jencks
It's pretty obvious where to put jee5 specs, and now I've committed this one. I was trying to ask where we want to put work on jee5 implementations so they won't interfere with the j2ee 1.4 implementation. I can see two choices: - if we can run the j2ee 1.4 tck with jee5 spec jars, we

Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-21 Thread David Blevins
On Aug 21, 2006, at 1:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: It's pretty obvious where to put jee5 specs, and now I've committed this one. I was trying to ask where we want to put work on jee5 implementations so they won't interfere with the j2ee 1.4 implementation. I can see two choices: - if we

Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-20 Thread David Jencks
I've implemented the jta 1.1 feature locally and want to do the ejb 3/ jpa container managed persistence stuff. Where should I put it? jta 1.1 adds one interface to jta 1.0.1B with AFAICT no other changes (I haven't actually been able to locate the spec, just the javadoc). Anyone know if

Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-20 Thread Guillaume Nodet
A first step would be to put the new version of the spec in specs/trunk/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec or something like that. On 8/21/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented the jta 1.1 feature locally and want to do the ejb 3/ jpa container managed persistence stuff. Where should

Re: Where should g. jee5 stuff go?

2006-08-20 Thread Jason Dillon
If possible I'd like to avoid any changes to specs/trunk until I have committed my changes to that tree. I've got it 95% done in my local workspace... and if we start making changes to it now it will probably invalidate several hours of work :-( --jason On Aug 20, 2006, at 7:44 PM,