Why a resource adapter deployed via console are not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

Hi all, I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some confusion as below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this. Here is the scenario: A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo plugins, but he prefers to the admin console. The Datasource pool was deployed

Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

Hi all, I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some confusion as below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this. Here is the scenario: A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo-plugins, and he prefers to the admin console. The datasource pool was deployed

Re: Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

I thought we had successfully tracked down all the console bits that didn't create car files. Could you please file a jira issue for 2.2? If you can figure out a patch that would be even better :-) thanks david jencks On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:37 PM, chi runhua wrote: Hi all, I was trying

Re: Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo configuration(.car)?

Thanks. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4749 Jeff C On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote: I thought we had successfully tracked down all the console bits that didn't create car files. Could you please file a jira issue for 2.2? If you can