Hi All,
I just updated the XML schemas documentation for 2.1 on the web site (couldn't
use the wiki). Here is the link
http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v21-xml-schemas.html
I also matched the actual schemas file name with their target namespaces to
make the IDEs happier ;-)
you're using to generate them ??
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Howdy,
I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't foun
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
Cheers!
Hernan
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Just to triple check, can we confirm these are all the schemas for 2.1?
attributes-1.2.xsd
corba-css-config-2.1.xsd
corba-tss-config-2.1.xsd
geronimo-application-2.0.xsd
geronimo-application-client-2.0.xsd
geronimo-connector-1.2.xsd
geronimo-jetty-2.0.2.xsd
geronimo-jetty-config-1.0.1.xsd
geronim
Here's a list of I can come up with:
Geronimo Plugin Descriptor:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/plugins-1.3
Tomcat-Only Web Application (WAR):
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web/tomcat-2.0.1
Jetty-Only Web Application (WAR):
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web/jetty-2.0.2
Jett
Howdy,
are we changing (releasing a new set of) the schemas for 2.1? Can somebody pls
check how valid this list still is
http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v20-xml-schemas.html
I have the schema docs somewhat ready but want to make sure I have the correct
links ;-)
I plan to host that
on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
Cheers!
Hernan
The 1.2 version is where comment support was added
to the config.xml file.
Jay
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Howdy,
I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xs
yment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
Cheers!
Hernan
Howdy,
I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and attributes-1.2.xsd
although I haven't found any reference to attributes-1.1. Are we still using
t
Howdy,
I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and attributes-1.2.xsd
although I haven't found any reference to attributes-1.1. Are we still using
t
On 9/25/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea is to ease development from IDE's that will pick up the schemas
> right away. Not sure the redirect would work for these scenarios.
Well, let me give a specific example. Let's say you have a web app's web.xml:
http://java.sun.com/
The idea is to ease development from IDE's that will pick up the schemas right
away. Not sure the redirect would work for these scenarios.
I tried the aliases, just a couple of symbolic links, but then realized about
the different directories for the schemas so I was hoping there would be
anot
I was being smart a$$... :-)
It doesn't handle schemas today, nor does maven-deploy-plugin
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
would this plugin be smart enough to place/rename the schemas in the
right "directory" accordingly to what's specified as the target name space?
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald W
I'm not that big a fan of trying to make the schema namespace be an
actual working URL. Should the schema's namespace end in ".xsd"?
That seems weird. Plus we have no control over the location for many
of the schemas we use (other projects we use, the Sun schemas, etc.)
And it might result in us
would this plugin be smart enough to place/rename the schemas in the right
"directory" accordingly to what's specified as the target name space?
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald Woods wrote:
Nope, but sounds like a good job for the maven-release-plugin :-)
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
try
Nope, but sounds like a good job for the maven-release-plugin :-)
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
trying to deal with the schemas update on the web site and I'm looking
to some things I would like to get your input.
First of all the actual schemas file name don't match the target n
t;
>
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Hernan
> >
> > Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
> >> What's the correct Geronimo Schema for EJB (JAR)? Is it not http://
> >> geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0 ??
> >> - Shiva
> >> On 9/18/07, *Hernan Cuni
Hi All,
trying to deal with the schemas update on the web site and I'm looking to some
things I would like to get your input.
First of all the actual schemas file name don't match the target name space
defined in the schema itself.
Here is the associated JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
hiva Kumar H R wrote:
What's the correct Geronimo Schema for EJB (JAR)? Is it not http://
geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0 ??
- Shiva
On 9/18/07, *Hernan Cunico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I've updated the XML Schemas info on th
ame and point to the Java EE 5 ones, I should think.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/17/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
You can take a quick look at the new organization here
http://cwiki.apache.or
unico* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0,
1.1 and 2.0
You can take a quick look at the new organization here
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/xml-schemas.html
<http://cwik
What's the correct Geronimo Schema for EJB (JAR)? Is it not
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0 ??
- Shiva
On 9/18/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and
> 2.0
>
&g
ould think.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 9/17/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and
> > 2.0
> >
> > You can take a quick look at the new organization here
> > http:/
The 2.0 page isn't quite right -- the preferred J2EE schemas on the
top right should name and point to the Java EE 5 ones, I should think.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/17/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for refle
I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
You can take a quick look at the new organization here
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/xml-schemas.html
Changes will get reflected on the live site within the next hour.
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
YES. I think Jarek already moved all the schemas
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/docs/schemas-2.0/) so
I'll be updating the web site soon.
Cheers!
Hernan
Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Are there any plans to put the schemas for 2.0.1 here:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml-sc
Are there any plans to put the schemas for 2.0.1 here:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml-schemas.html
Thanks
Anita
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yaho
They're in the Geronimo distribution in the schemas/ directory. We
don't have them posted to the web site yet though I'm working on it.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/19/06, mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I just want to know if there are existing some XML Schemas for
Hello,
I just want to know if there are existing some XML Schemas for Geronimo 1.1
already?
If so, then please paste the URL where I could find them.
Thanks alot
mika
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
30 matches
Mail list logo
