Jason Dillon wrote:
I've done this more times than I'd like to remember, even from a web
app... lemme know if you want a code snip.
A code snip would be great - Being able to initiate the built in dojo
build would be much simpler that parsing and rebuilding the javascript
code myself.
Jay
Invoking Ant from code is trivial. Create a Project, initialize it,
create a Task, configure it, execute it.
I've done this more times than I'd like to remember, even from a web
app... lemme know if you want a code snip.
--jason
On Oct 7, 2006, at 12:27 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10
On 10/6/06, Jay D. McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But, how would you trigger ant from a servlet?
Don't know how much it matters, but Ant is a bunch of Java classes so
a servlet can instantiate some and execute some kind of startup method
where Ant will get kicked off.
Jacek
--
Jacek Lasko
Paul McMahan wrote:
If you pull the dojo src tree from svn there is an additional
directory at buildscripts/profiles. You can use ant to build a custom
dojo.js based on the profiles in there. Seems like the servlet could
get passed a profile name and invoke ant to create the custom dojo.js
on t
If you pull the dojo src tree from svn there is an additional
directory at buildscripts/profiles. You can use ant to build a custom
dojo.js based on the profiles in there. Seems like the servlet could
get passed a profile name and invoke ant to create the custom dojo.js
on the fly. The output c
Paul McMahan wrote:
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could bui
Paul McMahan wrote:
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could bui
You raise a good point and it sounds like the idea would work, but I'm
concerned it could lead to a proliferation of dojo webapp components,
one for each custom configuration. I wonder if it might be possible
to instead create a servlet in the current dojo app that could build
and cache custom c
Hello Jay,
I agree with your idea to improve Dojo’s performance in G. I suggest you
create a JIRA for this so we can keep track of it. You might want to
checkout the Dojo builder (uses ant) which packages js and related files
into a single compressed js file. I think somebody from the devlist
Hello all,
I finally managed to get my project development/testing server up and
working on 1.2-snapshot (Thanks again djencks!).
And I finally got to see the JMX console that was added - Which is very
cool.
But, I think that it brings to light a performance issue. Because we
are using do
10 matches
Mail list logo
