Since we're not using the CMP generator of TranQL in 2.x I think we
can drop the Antlr reference as well. Any objections?
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does (maybe
spring).
-dain
On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM,
Before you do that, I'd make sure that antlr isn't in the server
repo. That way you will know that there isn't another library using
it. Antlr is very popular after all.
-dain
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Since we're not using the CMP generator of TranQL in 2.x I
Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does (maybe
spring).
-dain
On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Jarek,
I think the Spring filter is a leftover of the time when the Jetty
module was used to import Spring to configure WADI.
I do not know why antlr
That was an issue with Hibernate and Spring, that's why it was there.
It should be removable as I did it for Tomcat a while back after we
found Liferay wasn't working with it in there.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does (maybe
spring).
-dain
Hi Jarek,
I think the Spring filter is a leftover of the time when the Jetty
module was used to import Spring to configure WADI.
I do not know why antlr is there. As it is not directly imported by
Jetty6 poms, I think that we can also drop it.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 02/02/2007, at 3:07 PM,
Hi,
I have a question about the following entry in the
configs/jett6-deployer/src/plan/plan.xml:
hidden-classes
filterantlr./filter
filterorg.springframework./filter
/hidden-classes
Is that still needed/necessary?
