I'm having the same problem... I am using java version 1.5 on Mac OS X
Tiger... if I execute mvn with -X I see something interesting...
The path for the Bean file appears to be invalid... Here is the output:
2006-08-13 01:02:19,948 [main ] INFO XBeanXmlBeanDefinitionReader
-
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know?
IIRC it was an experiment that didn't work out. If the online
deployer doesn't use it and the maven car plugin doesn't use it
nothing uses it.
thanks
david jencks
--jason
On Aug 12, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I don't have anything left in dead-1.2. Jason, perhaps we can
propose a deadline of next Friday for completing the work or
raising an issue. That way we'll be able to put this baby to bed :)
I have some doubts I will be able to finish
On Aug 12, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:56 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Since the m1 build will be dropped and you have changed the plans,
it should be possible to remove the velocity merge.
Nope, the plan.xml is not being filtered as a normal resources at
Exactly, that's what I have been thinking too.
Let me work on it a bit more. I was thinking whether to introduce a
scripting or rules engine support such as Groovy or Drools to handle the
rules, your thoughts.
Yeah, I agree about the EIP component-wiretap. Let me also utilize it.
Soumadeep
The defaultMep is a mandatory attribute on consumer endpoints and should be
checked
---
Key: SM-536
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-536
Project:
Define several endpoint implementations instead of having only one
--
Key: SM-537
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-537
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type:
On 8/13/06, soumadeep sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, that's what I have been thinking too.
Cool :)
Let me work on it a bit more. I was thinking whether to introduce a
scripting or rules engine support such as Groovy or Drools to handle the
rules, your thoughts.
Note that spring
So it may be a platform issue. Philip, could you take a look at it ?
On 8/13/06, ldangelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having the same problem... I am using java version 1.5 on Mac OS X
Tiger... if I execute mvn with -X I see something interesting...
The path for the Bean file appears to
It been nuked.
--jason
On Aug 12, 2006, at 11:25 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know?
IIRC it was an experiment that didn't work out. If the online
deployer doesn't use it and the maven car plugin doesn't use it
nothing uses it.
I can peek at it soon... now that it appears that trunk and gplugins
are sorted.
--jason
On Aug 12, 2006, at 11:34 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:56 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Since the m1 build will be dropped and
I am not really concerned about deleting the dead-1.2 branch... but
I'd like to start reorganizing the module structure to the m2 standard.
--jason
On Aug 12, 2006, at 11:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I don't have anything left in dead-1.2.
So I can build Plugin A (quartz-scheduler). But the build for Plugin
B (quartz-deployer) which depends on Plugin A fails to create the CAR
with an error like this:
INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-874?page=all ]
Timothy Bish updated AMQ-874:
-
Attachment: example-patch-081306.txt
This patch contains a fixed exmaple main.cpp that will now compile. There is
also a new VC2005 project file for the exmaple.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-874?page=all ]
Timothy Bish reassigned AMQ-874:
Assignee: Nathan Mittler (was: Timothy Bish)
Nate, I'm assigning this to you so that it can be applied ASAP, since I don't
have commit access yet.
The
I marked all of my remaining changes as Unnecessary as they are all
simple changes the the build system which are not longer necessary.
-dain
On Aug 12, 2006, at 11:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I don't have anything left in dead-1.2.
On Aug 12, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Seems like I'm walking in mid-conversation, but I hope I can add some
details.
On Aug 11, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/11/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I understand where you are going
I swa the same on Friday and was going to checkout a new set of branches to make sure I hadn't
cobbled anything up. Looks like its chronic :( I think it started after the security fix but need
to verify if that is the culprit.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I just tried to build this branche from
Doesn't look like Alan's changes caused the problem -- they were
pretty small and localized.
The openejb-builder failures appear to be caused by a typo in
axis-builder project.xml introduced as part of the NOTICE changes.
Kevan is looking and has found at least one more bad project.xml too.
OK, the project.xml fixes helped, but we're still getting the failures
in configs, e.g.:
+
| configurations openejb Configuration for performing J2EE deployments
| Memory: 14M/25M
+
...
16:16:39,866 ERROR [Deployer]
While compiling custom components generated from maven jbi plugin, if maven
complains about generics are not supported in 1.3 then add the fragment
below in your POM file (in the plugins section).
This would only happen if you used generics in your java code!
plugin
Well, this happen as soon as you use JDK 5 features ;)
On 8/13/06, soumadeep sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While compiling custom components generated from maven jbi plugin, if
maven
complains about generics are not supported in 1.3 then add the fragment
below in your POM file (in the plugins
It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months. (see http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html)Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5 parsing ?
I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would make xbean-springJDK 5 specific. Any
OK, I think I'm going to leave this for now, but...
It looks like the problem below is definitely that as of a few days
ago, configs/openejb-deployer/target/plan/plan.xml had a dependency on
axis, and now it doesn't. I still don't know what could have changed
(other than the project.xml in
I'm not sure if this is related to the recent web app security fix or not.
I hacked the build enough that I got the 1.1.1 server running.
I went to the console, went to the database pool screen, selected that
I wanted to create a new pool, filled out the name and DB type on that
screen and hit
Add a new handler to force parsing the input message as a DOM
-
Key: SM-540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-540
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-540?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-540.
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Sun Aug 13 15:33:12 2006
New Revision: 431259
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=431259view=rev
Log:
SM-540: add a
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-874?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler resolved AMQ-874.
Resolution: Fixed
Patch has been applied to trunk.
The Activemq-cpp example code no longer builds.
---
Works on OS X now as well... nice work!
-LeoD
Antoni Reus wrote:
It seems there is a problem in samples:
It seems there is a problem with relative/absolute path of file
samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/src/main/resources/xbean.xml
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dprofile=step2
On 8/8/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to chime in with the Cayenne JPA provider here. Could you
point me in the right direction on how to approach integrating it
with the plugin you are writing?
Andrus,
I've put the initial JPA plugin code up on SourceForge at SVN
The code for the app-managed-JPA-for-web-apps plugin is up at SVN
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gplugins/jpa/trunk
So far, it's just got a TopLink provider, but if people want to copy
that to create providers for Cayenne or OpenJPA or whatever, that
would be great. It basically just needs
Hi Aaron,
Yeah, I'd appreciate if you could send me the missing stuff.
Andrus
On Aug 13, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to chime in with the Cayenne JPA provider here. Could you
point me in the right direction on how to
This is a good idea Paul. Im not exactly sure how you
would implement it but let me know if I can help with
anything (testing, dev, docs, etc.). This will
definitely help those who wanted to develop Ajax
enabled apps in G. Also nice to have is if we can find
a way to do the same thing for DWR if
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-39?page=comments#action_12427800 ]
Stefan Kleineikenscheidt commented on XBEAN-39:
---
A fix of this issue at Spring seems to be on its way, too:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=comments#action_36762 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-526:
Is this patch ok to apply ? Your last comment seens to indicate it was not
ready ...
Fault messages returned to BPEL via
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=all ]
Grant McDonald updated SM-526:
--
Description:
When returning output and fault messages an XMLInteractionObject is currently
being used to wrap the Document object created from the
Move org.apache.servicemix.eip.MessageUtil to
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.util.MessageUtil (in servicemix-core)
-
Key: SM-539
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-539?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-539.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Sun Aug 13 12:10:07 2006
New Revision: 431207
URL:
Thanks a ton... and that was amazingly fast...
Soumadeep
On 8/14/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done :)
The new class is
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.util.MessageUtil
On 8/13/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-422?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-422.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
throttleInterval and throttleTimeout should be configurable in servicemix.xml
Works now... built successfully
- Original Message -
From: Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:18 AM
Subject: Build failure
Just tried and update and install (with test off)
Stack trace:
==
[INFO]
Yeah, it seems it sometimes fail, but i have no idea why :(
On 8/13/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works now... built successfully
- Original Message -
From: Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006
42 matches
Mail list logo