Re: mx4j logging init

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
We don't need mx4j in 2.0 since jmx is in the vm starting with Java5. -dain On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know if we can replace these bits in GeronimoLogging.initialize() snip try { Class clazz = Class.forName(mx4j.log.Log); Class paramClazz =

2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I'm continuing to work through building M3 and am running into some issues resolving the SNAPSHOTs (and there are a lot of them ;-o) Its kind of like unravelling a hair ball so I think I'm close but often fixing one problem seems to only pop up another. Rather than push an aging build

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm continuing to work through building M3 and am running into some issues resolving the SNAPSHOTs (and there are a lot of them ;-o) ... 1. Continue revvving on the branch we have 2. Sync up with trunk (need to verify apps again) 3. Call the

Re: Geronimo Eclipse plugin for Apache Geronimo v1.0 only?

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
Shoot, more spec issues. Will probably have to add more exclusions, although I can't seem to reproduce it. -sachin On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 2/26/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way I could build the monster locally and install it? Yes,

Re: Geronimo Eclipse plugin for Apache Geronimo v1.0 only?

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/27/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shoot, more spec issues. Will probably have to add more exclusions, although I can't seem to reproduce it. Let me handle it. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: Geronimo Eclipse plugin for Apache Geronimo v1.0 only?

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/27/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me handle it. Reported as http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-134 Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-134) BUILD ERROR - Reason: Unable to download the artifact from any repository org.apache.geronimo.specs:specs:pom:1.1.1

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski (JIRA)
BUILD ERROR - Reason: Unable to download the artifact from any repository org.apache.geronimo.specs:specs:pom:1.1.1 --- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-134 URL:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2890) javamail provider jar is not getting included in the release 1.2 assemblies.

2007-02-27 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
javamail provider jar is not getting included in the release 1.2 assemblies. Key: GERONIMO-2890 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2890 Project: Geronimo

Re: Eclipse update site

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
Great! Would you mind if I pulled in your revisions? -sachin On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: Hi, I just want to say that we reused the devtool's dynamic update site for Apache Directory LDAP Studio. We adapted it a bit to return a site.xml with the preferred mirror,

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
Is there a general problem you're running into? Is there something different from this milestone to prior releases that is causing issues? -sachin On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'm continuing to work through building M3 and am running into some issues resolving the

Re: Geronimo Eclipse plugin for Apache Geronimo v1.0 only?

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/27/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you tell me which project this is failing on? Well, I haven't saved it. I'll be looking into it later so I either crack it or let you know the details where it fails and alike. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2891) Initial Cayenne Integration with Geronimo

2007-02-27 Thread Lasantha Ranaweera (JIRA)
Initial Cayenne Integration with Geronimo - Key: GERONIMO-2891 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2891 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: public (Regular

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2891) Initial Cayenne Integration with Geronimo

2007-02-27 Thread Lasantha Ranaweera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476167 ] Lasantha Ranaweera commented on GERONIMO-2891: -- I will come up with a patch soon. Initial Cayenne

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
Sounds good 2 me. -sachin On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon to use commons-cli to handle option processing? Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses commons-lang, which is already

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-27 Thread Rick McGuire
David Blevins wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To do that part just implement the ModuleBuilderExtension interface and you can hook into all phases of the EjbModuleBuilder. This is probably the part I have the most

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2890) javamail provider jar is not getting included in the release 1.2 assemblies.

2007-02-27 Thread Rick McGuire (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2890. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 512254. javamail provider jar is not getting

Re: [RESULT] VOTE J2G Conversion tool acceptance

2007-02-27 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Filip, There are 6 items under Copyright and Verify distribution rights. Someone on the pmc needs to deal with them and send an updated patch. At least the first 2 under Verify distribution rights can be marked Not Applicable. thanks, dims On 2/26/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2892) Undeploy locks files on Windows

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap (JIRA)
Undeploy locks files on Windows --- Key: GERONIMO-2892 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2892 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

Re: Can somebody please verify that undeploy works (on Windows) ?

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Opened a JIRA to keep track of this - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2892 Cheers Prasad On 2/22/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After few build problems (see another thread) I got test-ear-j2ee_1.4 to deploy and undeploy. The following files are left in

Open JBI Components naming convention

2007-02-27 Thread jlo_gestalt
Just wanted to post a naming convention that was accepted in the Open JBI Components project on java.net. http://www.glassfishwiki.org/jbiwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBIComponentAndSharedLibraryNaming I believe SM already is really similiar minus indicating whether it's a binding or engine. -- View this

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Hernan Cunico
yup, links look better now. What's the trick? are you massaging the pages during the rsync? As for the account, I think there is already a discussion on infra@ for creating/securing a confluence based account on p.a.o We could have the rendered HTML in SVN but we wont have the chance to keep

xbean-reflect jar version?

2007-02-27 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
Openejb is using 2.9-SNAPSHOT for xbean-reflect jar: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-openejb:jar:2.0-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.openejb:openejb-core:jar:3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT 3) org.apache.xbean:xbean-reflect:jar:2.9-SNAPSHOT We are using 2.8 for

Re: xbean-reflect jar version?

2007-02-27 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
Also ... Could someone with karma please remove the dependency on mx4j in xbean-reflect pom (shown here)? . dependencies dependency groupIdmx4j/groupId artifactIdmx4j/artifactId /dependency

[BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512268

2007-02-27 Thread prasad
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 512268 built with tests skipped See the full build-1000.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1000.log /home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-cxf/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/cxf/CXFEndpoint.java:[152,18

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
actually, if we just released the assemblies and didn't worry about artifacts then we're already done. Thoughts about that ? On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 2/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm continuing to work through building M3 and am running into

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I think the problem was in resolving the snapshots (of which there are many). I must have fat-fingered one of the dependencies. I was getting compilation problems. However, backing off of my modded tree to what's in the branch I'm back to goodness. On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Sachin

Re: Additional 'inverse' classloader view in Geronimo Console

2007-02-27 Thread Rakesh Midha
Thanks Paul I will look into the sorting request? Thanks Rakesh On 2/26/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I chair my own little PMC but unfortunately can't seem to keep the committers from flaming each other. You make it look so easy Matt! :-) Best wishes, Paul On 2/26/07,

Re: Division of responsibilities for annotations to xml and jndi entries

2007-02-27 Thread Tim McConnell
This is the error I'm getting from the new EJB classloader java.lang.Exception: Could not load calculator-stateless-war-2/0-SNAPSHOT/war/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/geronimo/samples/calculator/CalculatorServlet.class at

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512268

2007-02-27 Thread Jarek Gawor
with: -Dorg.apache.geronimo.jaxws.provider=axis2 Jarek On 27 Feb 2007 15:13:19 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 512268 built with tests skipped See the full build-1000.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1000.log

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Joe Bohn
Matt Hogstrom wrote: actually, if we just released the assemblies and didn't worry about artifacts then we're already done. Thoughts about that ? I think it might be fine to just release the assemblies for a milestone (and any related plugins to a plugin repo). How many people picking up

[jira] Commented: (DAYTRADER-35) Change createDB script for the Geronimo 2.0

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476209 ] Christopher James Blythe commented on DAYTRADER-35: --- A feature was added into Daytrader 1.2 and

[jira] Created: (DAYTRADER-36) Clean/update scripts in bin directory and remove images directory

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
Clean/update scripts in bin directory and remove images directory - Key: DAYTRADER-36 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-36 Project: DayTrader Issue Type:

[DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered in the tree. I'd like to move those repos to a top level repository directory for the tree. This helps out so that any artifacts that are related to a release are put in one place. Here is the list of repos:

Re: Switching to 3.0-SNAPSHOT and dropping spring 1.x release

2007-02-27 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 2/23/07, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 as well. Spring (1.x) is dead, long live Spring (2.0)! - Dan On 2/23/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds good to me. +1 On 2/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about switching to 3.0-SNAPSHOT and

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I don't care as long as you don't change the cli syntax. IIRC the code originally used commons cli, but someone removed it because it wasn't flexible enough. It was a very long time ago, so my memory is fuzzy. -dain On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I

Re: xbean-reflect jar version?

2007-02-27 Thread David Jencks
You should be able to fix the xbean pom yourself. I think we're going to want the xbean-reflect in a rather root module/ classloader since it's getting used for injections in openejb, jetty, and the app client (later today) How about including it in j2ee-server? thanks david jencks On

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2893) Local/Remote support for EJB annotations inconsistent (i.e., same as not working)

2007-02-27 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
Local/Remote support for EJB annotations inconsistent (i.e., same as not working) - Key: GERONIMO-2893 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2893 Project:

[jira] Assigned: (DAYTRADER-36) Clean/update scripts in bin directory and remove images directory

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher James Blythe reassigned DAYTRADER-36: - Assignee: Christopher James Blythe Clean/update scripts in

Re: xbean-reflect jar version?

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Done. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Also ... Could someone with karma please remove the dependency on mx4j in xbean-reflect pom (shown here)? . dependencies dependency groupIdmx4j/groupId

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
-1. In order for devtools to put out a milestone I need to depend on non-snapshot versions of the individual geronimo artifacts. -sachin On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: actually, if we just released the assemblies and didn't worry about artifacts then we're already

[jira] Assigned: (DAYTRADER-35) Change createDB script for the Geronimo 2.0

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher James Blythe reassigned DAYTRADER-35: - Assignee: Christopher James Blythe Change createDB script for

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133) v2.0.0 plugin builds on Windows, but fails to build on any recent version of SUSE Linux

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476248 ] Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133: --- I can produce this problem, not on the

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 2/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered in the tree. I'd like to move those repos to a top level repository directory for the tree. This helps out so that any artifacts that are related to a release are put in one

Re: xbean-reflect jar version?

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I wasn't aware that Geronimo was using xbean-reflect directly... anyway, you should update G to use 2.9-SNAPSHOT also. It contains several fixes and a few new features. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Openejb is using 2.9-SNAPSHOT for xbean-reflect jar:

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Joe Bohn
+1. I think Jason had mentioned this in another thread. I think it makes sense to consolidate the pain in one place (it's also easier to keep up with changes that way). Joe Matt Hogstrom wrote: In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered in the tree. I'd like to

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2894) Restructure geronimo-axis2 code to split between EJB and POJO containers

2007-02-27 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2894: -- Attachment: G2894.patch Restructure geronimo-axis2 code to split between EJB and POJO containers

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2894) Restructure geronimo-axis2 code to split between EJB and POJO containers

2007-02-27 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
Restructure geronimo-axis2 code to split between EJB and POJO containers Key: GERONIMO-2894 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2894 Project: Geronimo

[BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512360

2007-02-27 Thread prasad
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 512360 built with tests skipped See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1400.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'jetty:org.mortbay.jetty:jar:5.1.11' from repository apache-incubator (http

Re: Tomcat m2 repo?

2007-02-27 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Jason Dillon wrote: Okay, hopefully they will get the kinks out soon ;-) yes, still work in progress :) Filip --jason On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Paul McMahan wrote: Tomcat currently builds with ant and then manually publish their jars to a repo at tomcat.apache.org.See

[jira] Closed: (DAYTRADER-36) Clean/update scripts in bin directory and remove images directory

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-36. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 1.2

[jira] Closed: (DAYTRADER-35) Change createDB script for the Geronimo 2.0

2007-02-27 Thread Christopher James Blythe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-35. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 1.2

Re: Context level clustering not supported in Tomcat it seems

2007-02-27 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Context level clustering is supported in TC 6 Shiva Kumar H R wrote: As part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577 I had opened the following bug in Tomcat: Context level clustering on 3 or more nodes fails in Tomcat 5.5.20

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Hernan Cunico
+1, it makes sense to keep all the repos in one place. Maintaining it should be easier. Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered in the tree. I'd like to move those repos to a top level repository directory for the tree. This

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps in these local artifacts, strange artifact resolution

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, links look better now. What's the trick? are you massaging the pages during the rsync? Nope... Just rsycn -tr src/ dest/ As for the account, I think there is already a discussion on infra@ for creating/securing a confluence based

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
I would leave the m3 branch alone... its not worth the effort to change things there... though you may want to merge the myfaces repo changes (configs/jasper) from trunk, to help with SNAPSHOT resolution when Mvn tries to perform updates. As for the rest of these, I mentioned a way to

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from being the same... except, that the '-vv' and '-v' options end up merging into one '-v' option, which can be specified more than one to increase verbosity, so the usage of '-vv' is the same, but technically there would be no

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Hernan Cunico
Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, links look better now. What's the trick? are you massaging the pages during the rsync? Nope... Just rsycn -tr src/ dest/ hmm, I was wondering how different would it be from the one Jeff T is running. See his copies

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, links look better now. What's the trick? are you massaging the pages during the rsync? Nope... Just rsycn -tr src/ dest/ hmm, I was wondering how different would it

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 2/27/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps in

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: pom.xml: http://rifers.org/paste/show/3692 log: http://rifers.org/paste/show/3693 I think I am missing something very glaringly obvious here. Here's the glaringly obvious mistake I had made. Had set snaps to true and releases to false. Now

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Hernan Cunico
Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, links look better now. What's the trick? are you massaging the pages during the rsync? Nope... Just rsycn -tr src/ dest/ hmm, I was wondering

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
OK. M3 changes done. Will do the same for trunk and 1.2. Cheers Prasad On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would leave the m3 branch alone... its not worth the effort to change things there... though you may want to merge the myfaces repo changes (configs/jasper) from trunk, to

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133) v2.0.0 plugin builds on Windows, but fails to build on any recent version of SUSE Linux

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-133. - Resolution: Fixed Found the problem, there was a bug in the install

Re: 2.0-M3 Build Update

2007-02-27 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/27/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1. In order for devtools to put out a milestone I need to depend on non-snapshot versions of the individual geronimo artifacts. I don't get it. You need Geronimo binaries, don't you? AFAIUI, they'll be available, but the point is whether or

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we should switch as what we have is currently working fine. Sorry, perhaps I was unclear before. -v, -vv will continue to work (-vvv didn't work before, but will

Re: mx4j logging init

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Good point... we should start ripping that stuff out, probably save a wee bit of space in the assembly. Though... by doing so we are at the mercy of the JVM to provide a JMX system that doesn't suck ass (horrible bugs, etc). --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

Re: RecoveryController ERROR messages on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know what these mean? And why the show up when booting up Geronimo? snip ERROR [RecoveryController] javax.transaction.xa.XAException: No current connection. ... ERROR [RecoveryController] javax.transaction.xa.XAException: The

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we should switch as what we have is currently working fine. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from being the same... except, that

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2701) Spec changes

2007-02-27 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2701: Attachment: GERONIMO-2701.patch Specs patch for JSR-88 1.2 Spec changes

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2895) RecoveryController ERROR messages on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
RecoveryController ERROR messages on startup Key: GERONIMO-2895 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2895 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular

Re: RecoveryController ERROR messages on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know what these mean? And why the show up when booting up Geronimo? snip ERROR [RecoveryController] javax.transaction.xa.XAException: No current connection. ... ERROR

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2896) WebXmlParser WARN on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
WebXmlParser WARN on startup Key: GERONIMO-2896 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2896 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Reporter:

Re: WebXmlParser WARN on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Created to track: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2896 --jason On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Paul McMahan wrote: On 2/26/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By squelched you mean adding an entry in server-log4j.properties to limit the level of WebXmlParser to ERROR or

Re: GBeanInstance/GBeanInstanceState eating exceptions?

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Know off hand what the change revision was? This *should* probably make it into 1.2 at some point... --jason On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:52 PM, David Jencks wrote: The stuff I added was mostly changing interfaces so the client could access the reason, and having the client do so: I also

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2896) WebXmlParser WARN on startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2896: --- Affects Version/s: 2.0 WebXmlParser WARN on startup

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2701) Spec changes

2007-02-27 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2701. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: David Jencks (was: Tim McConnell) the patch has some

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512360

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1400.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'jetty:org.mortbay.jetty:jar:5.1.11' from repository apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/) Downloading: http

[BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512472

2007-02-27 Thread prasad
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 512472 built with tests skipped See the full build-1800.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1800.log 104K downloaded Downloading: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository//org/springframework/spring-context

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI, I setup a sync for 5 after the hour: /usr/local/bin/rsync -tr /home/jefft/public_html/confluence/ GMOxSITE/ /www/geronimo.apache.org/newsite/ Once I verify this is happy, I'll hand over this task to Hernan for his crontab on people ;-) Still waiting for the live sync to make sure

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-27 Thread David Blevins
On Feb 27, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: David Blevins wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To do that part just implement the ModuleBuilderExtension interface and you can hook into all phases of the

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512360

2007-02-27 Thread Tim McConnell
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 512360 built with tests skipped See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070227/build-1400.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'jetty:org.mortbay.jetty:jar:5.1.11' from repository apache

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Makes since. It sucks we the help can't list them as separate options, but it is good enough as is. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we

Re: mx4j logging init

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
With the exception of the remote deployer, we don't rely on JMX. The remote deployer uses JMX remoting to connect to the Geronimo deployment service. Assuming that works, we should be ok using what the vm ships. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Good point... we

No more legacy repos in server/trunk

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Now that Prasad created a top-level repository/* module for our local repo hacks, I've added the jstl artifacts and remove all legacy repos from the build. Please, please, please... avoid adding *any* legacy repos. If you need to add a legacy repo, please ping the list so we can discuss

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: What's the motivation to do this to m3 (which is a very short-lived branch)? There are more SNAPSHOTs now than before and to help finish the building of the branch. Sorry for not posting this on the thread which was started on the

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Otay... well, looks like Prasad applied this to m3, so you should be good. --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: What's the motivation to do this to m3 (which is a very short- lived branch)? There are more

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Sounds good. On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon to use commons-cli to handle option processing? Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses commons-lang, which is already there), and will

Re: mx4j logging init

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Okay, if we don't need it then we can save ~600k wooopie... and can prolly remove a few hackish bits (like the logging init stuff). --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: With the exception of the remote deployer, we don't rely on JMX. The remote deployer uses JMX

Re: [Discussion] Geronimo web site update

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI, its up now: http://geronimo.apache.org/newsite/ --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, links look better now. What's

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-27 Thread Rick McGuire
David Blevins wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: David Blevins wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To do that part just implement the ModuleBuilderExtension interface and you can hook into all

[jira] Commented: (SM-108) Timer is repeatedly setup/cancelled during startup

2007-02-27 Thread Jamie Goodyear (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38615 ] Jamie Goodyear commented on SM-108: --- Hi All, Reviewing this report it appears that the timer restart issue was

Geronimo :: Configuration Converter build error....

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
snip [INFO] [INFO] Building Geronimo :: Configuration Converter [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] [INFO]

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-27 Thread David Blevins
On Feb 27, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: David Blevins wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I'm about 99.% certain that tss was a very old element type that was never deleted from the schema. The only one I'm aware is still getting used is the tss-link, so

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 512360

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
/20070227/build-1400.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'jetty:org.mortbay.jetty:jar:5.1.11' from repository apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/) Downloading: http://repository.codehaus.org/jetty/org.mortbay.jetty/5.1.11/org.mortbay.jetty-5.1.11.jar

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2894) Restructure geronimo-axis2 code to split between EJB and POJO containers

2007-02-27 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476493 ] Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2894: --- Sorry but the patch was not generated correctly. didn't delete the two

Build failure Building Geronimo :: CXF missing com.sun.xml.bind:* 2.1.2

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Where are the 2.1.2 version of the com.sun.xml.bind jars at? BTW, I'm getting a wee bit annoyed at all of the recent build breakage that is being caused by the WS effort... I'm not singling anyone out, but I hope that in the future that more care will be taken by everyone to *not break the

Re: Build failure Building Geronimo :: CXF missing com.sun.xml.bind:* 2.1.2

2007-02-27 Thread Jarek Gawor
Jason, 1) The code is broken because of a change of dependencies in the 3rd party library (and not because of broken code in Geronimo) 2) I sent out an email about the JAXB issue earlier today. Hopefully, that issue will be resolved within a day or so. 3) For now somebody could commit that

Re: Build failure Building Geronimo :: CXF missing com.sun.xml.bind:* 2.1.2

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
I must have missed that in the ~400 emails I got today... where is the patch? --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Jason, 1) The code is broken because of a change of dependencies in the 3rd party library (and not because of broken code in Geronimo) 2) I sent out an

Re: Build failure Building Geronimo :: CXF missing com.sun.xml.bind:* 2.1.2

2007-02-27 Thread Jarek Gawor
Attached. Jarek On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must have missed that in the ~400 emails I got today... where is the patch? --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Jason, 1) The code is broken because of a change of dependencies in the 3rd party

  1   2   >