Fixing genesis so release plugin works

After a lot of struggle I think I figured out how to make the release plugin tag into the right place. The root genesis pom needs a release profile with the tagBase in it. Then child release profiles can override the tagBase. Where it is now in the main build/plugins/ plugin section it

Proposed release process

We've previously discussed and I think agreed that the documented release process is seriously out of date with the current capabilities of maven. I'm proposing we update the documented release process to rely primarily on the maven-release-plugin. I've written this up here:

[BUILD] 2.2: Failed for Revision: 632562

Geronimo Revision: 632562 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080301/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080301 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

My new office

http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ :-P --jason

Re: My new office

Hmm, pretty nice and comfortable. And, surely, effective. :) Vasily 2008/3/1 Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ :-P --jason

Re: My new office

Office you say? I'm going to have to see what I can do about getting a bed installed into my office. Increases productivity, I'm sure. Nice place! On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Vasily Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, pretty nice and comfortable. And, surely, effective. :) Vasily

[BUILD] 2.1.1: Failed for Revision: 632584

Geronimo Revision: 632584 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080301/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080301 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

Re: My new office

2008/3/1 Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ Evidently you're back in Thailand, eh? Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache Camel -

Re: G2.1/SjAS'04 issue: TranQL/OpenJPA

Hi Vasiliy, I'll take a look at this one and the other issue you noted in OpenEJB in another e-mail.First step is I'll grab your updated DDs. Just out of curiosity, are you deploying this to Oracle? On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: Hi, Matt, all, The third

Re: My new office

Very nice. Looks like an excellent environment. But where oh where are the AMD servers? :) On Mar 1, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ :-P --jason

Re: G2.1/SjAS'04 issue: TranQL/OpenJPA

Thanks, Matt! No, I'm using a build-in Derby/Embedded/XA. Vasily On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Vasiliy, I'll take a look at this one and the other issue you noted in OpenEJB in another e-mail.First step is I'll grab your updated DDs. Just

How to delete a GBean from a web app packaged inside an EAR app?

I am trying to disable the Users and Groups portlet by stopping the corresponding AdminConsoleExtensionGBean extension GBean. I am able to stop the GBean programatically using the following code: AbstractNameQuery query = new AbstractNameQuery(

Re: G2.1/SjAS'04 issue: OPENEJB-700

On Feb 29, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Vasily Zakharov wrote: Hi, all, I'm once again trying to couple SPECjAppServer2004 with Geronimo, now version 2.1, and one of the problems I observe is: Issue OPENEJB-700 that is now closed as it was fixed in OpenEJB v3.0b2 that is used in G2.1, seems to be still

Re: My new office

Wow is that place extremely well decorated. -David On Mar 1, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ :-P --jason

Re: My new office

Nice place you have there Jason, I'm going to Bangkok (on the way to Samui) next month so maybe I bump in to you (beer drinking) on Kosam road ;) cheers /peter p Jason Dillon wrote: http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/ :-P --jason

Version numbers for plugins of external apps

How are we going to name plugins for external apps, such as roller or apache directory? There are three versions involved: 1. geronimo version 2. external app version 3. plugin version I figure if we're developing/releasing it the groupId is going to be o.a.g.plugins That leaves us with

Re: G2.1/SjAS'04 issue: OPENEJB-700

I have no idea what's going on with it. It really ticks me off as that's the kind of feature you should have to enable in a parser not disable. Is it? I thought the engine should first check if the necessary scheme is present locally and only try download if no local copy is present.

Re: Version numbers for plugins of external apps

Hi, I believe the external app version is quite important from an end- user perspective; so, I'm inclined to go for B then C. For instance, users clearly see the external app version while browsing plugin repositories. Furthermore, this allows the clear versioning of two plugins for