Geronimo Revision: 955129 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616/build-0200.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100616
[INFO] BUILD
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
Is there also a binary package to try out? I guess this would make more
eyeballs test the new server.
Juergen
--
View this message in context:
On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:45 AM, weberjn wrote:
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
Is there also a binary package to try out? I guess this would make more
eyeballs test the new server.
They are staged here --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879333#action_12879333
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5369:
Hmm. I wouldn't drop 1.5 support in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879338#action_12879338
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5369:
---
Right, Besides this JIRA, I saw some saaj
Geronimo Revision: 955103 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100615/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100615
[INFO] BUILD
Hi everyone,
What I am currently trying to do is to expose the content of a directory on
my Geronimo server.
More precisely, I've migrated web applications from Tomcat 6 to Geronimo.
When I was running my applications on Tomcat 6, I've defined a context
within the server.xml so that users can
On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I
don't think have been pointed out yet:
Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql
connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this
A few people have asked about running the Apache Aries samples under
Geronimo 3.0. Jarek first posted about this a while ago and since then
I created some wiki pages with the directions and even created a
Geronimo blog entry about it (so far the only real blog entry we have -
nudge ;-) ).
Geronimo Revision: 955351 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100616/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100616
[INFO] BUILD
Have you tried the in-place deployment ?
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/deploying-and-undeploying-applications.html#Deployingandundeployingapplications-ViaDeployertool
2010/6/17 superk888 superk...@gmail.com
Hi everyone,
What I am currently trying to do is to expose the content of a
I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the
reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to
external users).
Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed
to do the trick? I tried this but it doesn't work.
--
View
Not sure I understand your reponse correctly,
a. you only need to deploy another web application using in-place
deployment, which points to the directory
b. in the geronimo-web.xml, configure the context path with reporting
2010/6/17 superk888 superk...@gmail.com
I did ran into this page but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-5325.
--
Thanks Shawn for the great job!
iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
On Jun 16, 2010, at 6:44 PM, superk888 wrote:
I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the
reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to
external users).
Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed
to do
We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start the
server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for more
background.
Jarek,
I remember that you are owner of the geronimo build system. Can you help do
that ?
Thanks for the comments, please find my input inlines.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.comwrote:
On 6/14/10 10:01 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
#1-3 are good usability improvements.
Can we use Dojo for #4-6? Seems hover help would be the best option, as
adding
Shawn,
2.1 and 2.2 are already built with Java 5.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start the
server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for more
background.
18 matches
Mail list logo