specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, isn't?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>
>
> I think we can start
Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do one
repo per atomic release.
For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or work
with infra to bulk migrate it).
Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
Hi Mark,
I guess you mean for the release ?
If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s what
I’m doing at ServiceMix).
But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less
convenient anyway).
Regards
JB
> Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark
Hi!
The VOTE did succeed with
+1: JBO, Romain, Ray, Francois, Mark, Reinhard, Cesar
no -1 nor 0
txs 2 all who reviewed and voted!
Gonna go on with the release.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 08.05.2021 um 09:51 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> hi lords and ladies!
>
> I want to call a VOTE on releasing
+1
Ray
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:15 AM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
> > 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>
> I can only give +1 to this point ;)
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2021, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> > Guess we
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
I can only give +1 to this point ;)
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2021, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
> do
