[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-611) Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)

Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6) - Key: GERONIMO-611 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611 Project: Geronimo Type: Task Reporter: John Sisson Changes are

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-611) Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611?page=comments#action_61043 ] Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-611: Are you also investigating UGLI? Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-611) Changes required to Geronimo to work with Log4j 1.3 (alpha-6)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611?page=comments#action_61046 ] John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-611: -- After reading the heated exchanges in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143 , the comments regarding UGLI

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-609) geronimo.log can be closed whilst distributing an EAR if the application uses log4j

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_61047 ] John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-609: -- Sorry, I was thinking of Servlet classloading, not standard classloading. I am at a bit of a loss as to how to solve this

Re: Change to AxisWebServiceContainer class in axis module?

Yap, Dims and David .. I will move the TestCase to the axis-builder Just a random thought .. the AxisWebServiceContainer not work with just any SOAPService and expect certain value to be set. Since the normal user do not see this details it is not critical. but it does not live up to the

Re: Change to AxisWebServiceContainer class in axis module?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:45:54AM +0600, Srinath Perera wrote: Yap, Dims and David .. I will move the TestCase to the axis-builder Cool. I have some pending changes, so it may fail in the meantime. If it does, just hang tight till I can get things checked in. Just a random thought ..

Re: Change to AxisWebServiceContainer class in axis module?

I have some pending changes, so it may fail in the meantime. If it does, just hang tight till I can get things checked in. cool And when I tried with the most natural way to get a SOAPService (by parsing axis DD, deploy.wsdd) and run the AxisWebServiceContainer with that SOAP

activemq

Hello, I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So, I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file instead of building ActiveMQ. Thanks much! -Hari

Re: activemq

That is correct. The combined build of geronimo, openejb, and tranql is actually a rather bad idea although IMO required by the current module structure. I've been hoping for several months that we could move to a more sensible comprehensive build system but it may still not happen for some

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-612) OpenORBStubClassLoader needs to track parent cl

OpenORBStubClassLoader needs to track parent cl --- Key: GERONIMO-612 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-612 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Components: OpenEJB Versions: 1.0-M3 Reporter: David

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-612) OpenORBStubClassLoader needs to track parent cl

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-612?page=history ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-612: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 1.0-M4 fixed. Openejb doesn't have revision numbers. Could use review. I think this class has a memory

Re: activemq

Yes...we will depend on the jar. Jeff Hari Kodungallur wrote: Hello, I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So, I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file instead of building