[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-528?page=comments#action_36466 ]
Holger Hoffstätte commented on AMQ-528:
---
Note: I'm not a dev on AMQ or the backport; I just use them myself.
Is this something that can be done from the application
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of ServiceMix 3.0-M2.
Distributions are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.0-M2-incubating/m2/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.0-M2-incubating/
Maven 1, Maven 2 repos and site are available at
So to get a GBean running in Geronimo, you need to write a deployment
plan for it. If you look at the advanced plugin sample under
Geronimo Deployment Plan, you'll see an example.
The plan should have a dependency element for any server module that
must be running in order for the GBean to work
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1980?page=comments#action_12417599
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1980:
Yes, that sounds like a good idea to pursue. The only question is where to put
the DefaultThreadPool that the plugin
The subject says it all. Publishing the jars next.
Matt
So for next release, I was thinking about working on some
enhancements to the eclipse-plugin to provide some g-plugin/services
creation tools wizards that could do some basic things like
automatic codegeneration to provide stubbed out classes/methods. Do
people see any value in this? Are
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-528?page=comments#action_36465 ]
will gunadi commented on AMQ-528:
-
Holger wrote:
So it seems a proper shutdown of the Executor will solve this.
Is this something that can be done from the application code?
Gbean wizard would be nice that provides a GBean skeleton and plan.
Sachin Patel wrote:
So for next release, I was thinking about working on some enhancements
to the eclipse-plugin to provide some g-plugin/services creation tools
wizards that could do some basic things like automatic
On 6/23/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacek Laskowski (verbal...Jacek lost his connection but gave his verbal +1,
Jacek can you confirm this)
Confirmed.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
On 6/24/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gbean wizard would be nice that provides a GBean skeleton and plan.
That raises a question whether GBean skeleton/plan are required at
all? Could that be worked out with annotations (and retrotranslator)?
Would XBean help us in any way so just
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1738:
-
Attachment: geronimo-deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.2.patch
This patch was attached under the uber JIRA GERONIMO-2071. It is currently
pending an RTC
I got myself a fresh clean checkout of trunk and built just the
modules. I encountered the following problems -
1. The j2ee module compilation failed due to a dependency on ejb spec jar.
2. The web-builder modules failed compilation due to a dependency on
servlet spec jar.
I have attached a
Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
Rick
+1
BTW, do you think that
13 matches
Mail list logo
