Re: Update to the wiki for the ActiveMQ CPP library

2006-07-08 Thread arashad
Hi, This file main.cpp gives the following run time Exception what is wrong... # ActiveMQConnectionFactory::parseURL - Marlformed URI: 127.0.0.1:61613 - tid: 1078750128 FILE: /home/activemq-cpp/src/main/activemq/core/ActiveMQConnectionFactory.cpp, LINE: 209

RE: Update to the wiki for the ActiveMQ CPP library

2006-07-08 Thread Timothy Bish
Sorry about that The URI parsing code in there right now is sort of a hack, that's on my list of things to fix. If you change the code to this ActiveMQConnectionFactory* connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(tcp://127.0.0.1:61613); It should work for you. I'll try and get a

Problem with projectDeploy task

2006-07-08 Thread Terry Cox
Refactored the projectDeploy goal so that is can determine whether dependencies are already deployed and if so it will stop and undeploy them before redeploying This seems to have broken the jbi:projectDeploy task here. I now get: [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: Problem with projectDeploy task

2006-07-08 Thread Philip Dodds
Terry, I have applied a fix to the ListServiceAssemblies task in servicemix-core and added a testcase to make sure its working, the problem was an issue when the SA wasn't deployed already. Also I have updated the jbi-maven-plugin since it wasn't correctly determining the SA was deployed and

Re: JEE 5.0 Report Card

2006-07-08 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 7/8/06, David Klavon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take a look... comments for improvement are welcomed. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-jee-50-report-card.html Excellent! I'd go a step further - each spec could point to its own page with details on how it;s going to be implemented or

Re: A few tests need some help

2006-07-08 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 7/8/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And... again, can I get someone to look at why the tests listed above fail? It aligns with my goal of improving our test base and seems to be an excellent chance to start the work. I'm checking out the branch and am going to give these failing

Re: Tag 1.1 issue?

2006-07-08 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 7/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still believe there is value getting the state of OpenEJB at tagged level and accessing it with m:co. Here is an example... I am trying to research some classloading issues regarding OpenEJB and Geronimo 1.1. It behooves me to have source

Re: Tag 1.1 issue?

2006-07-08 Thread Jeff Genender
Yep...I did the exact same thing as you to fix this ;-) I just left out all that SNAPSHOT stuff in the email. But I agree...that needs some good documenting. Bruce Snyder wrote: On 7/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still believe there is value getting the state of OpenEJB at

Re: A few tests need some help

2006-07-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Jason, The test failures in the security module are documented here - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1672 The Connector15DCBTest failures is new. These tests used to pass in the old trunk. There is no MailCapTest in rev. 418907. The PluginInstallerTest is a new test added in

Re: Help: Mapping to Apache Directory project's new groupId:artifactId

2006-07-08 Thread anita kulshreshtha
inline.. --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we don't use the repository in our assembly descriptor to copy the modules from the local repo to geronimo repo, then we won't see this problem of an invalid pom. Since installing the car will install almost all of the modules into the

Re: Help: Mapping to Apache Directory project's new groupId:artifactId

2006-07-08 Thread Alex Karasulu
Sorry I missed this email. I was on vacation and focusing less on G emails these past few busy weeks. My mail filter put it in the Geronimo folder regardless of the addresses included. The ApacheDS dependencies you guys are looking for are in the repo here:

Re: Help: Mapping to Apache Directory project's new groupId:artifactId

2006-07-08 Thread David Jencks
On Jul 8, 2006, at 6:35 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: inline.. --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we don't use the repository in our assembly descriptor to copy the modules from the local repo to geronimo repo, then we won't see this problem of an invalid pom. Since installing

Re: Thoughts on restructuring

2006-07-08 Thread Philip Dodds
Maybe another thing is cleaner separation of the packagings of ServiceMix, such that we can have the stand-alone project, then the TomCat WAR deployment, JBoss Deployment (obviously outside Apache) and Geronimo deployment as separate downloads. I was just thinking this might reduce the size of

Re: How were the Geronimo 1.0 and 1.1 artifacts published to a Maven2 Repo?

2006-07-08 Thread Donald Woods
Still wondering how this was done Did someone have to run mvn install:install-file ... for every Geronimo 1.0 and 1.1 artifact to get them published to a Maven 2 repo? Since the Eclipse plug-in and any plug-ins we publish to GeronimoPlugins require artifacts from Maven 2, we need this

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2168) NPE when deploying RAR

2006-07-08 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2168?page=comments#action_12419869 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2168: Have you tried removing the spaces from the name and giving it a real Maven friendly version number like 0.1 instead of

Re: Tag 1.1 issue?

2006-07-08 Thread David Blevins
On Jul 8, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: On 7/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still believe there is value getting the state of OpenEJB at tagged level and accessing it with m:co. Here is an example... I am trying to research some classloading issues regarding OpenEJB

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2177) Move the installer portion of assembly out of trunk to sandbox

2006-07-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Move the installer portion of assembly out of trunk to sandbox -- Key: GERONIMO-2177 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2177 Project: Geronimo Type: New Feature Security: public (Regular

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2176) deploy time validations lost in openejb rewrite

2006-07-08 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
deploy time validations lost in openejb rewrite --- Key: GERONIMO-2176 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2176 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Security: public (Regular issues) Components: OpenEJB

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2125) Classpath entries in the web app archive META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are not added to the wep app class path

2006-07-08 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2125?page=all ] David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2125: -- Assign To: David Jencks Classpath entries in the web app archive META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are not added to the wep app class path

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-2173) Fix branches/1.1 (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) build

2006-07-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2173?page=all ] Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-2173: Resolution: Fixed Fixed explicit_versions.properties to insure the proper version of tranql would be loaded. Also fixed a number of plugin

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2174) Remove modules/console-web

2006-07-08 Thread Jason Dillon (JIRA)
Remove modules/console-web Key: GERONIMO-2174 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2174 Project: Geronimo Type: Task Security: public (Regular issues) Components: buildsystem Versions: 1.2 Reporter:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2125) Classpath entries in the web app archive META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are not added to the wep app class path

2006-07-08 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2125?page=comments#action_12419880 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2125: I can't reproduce this problem on 1.2 or 1.1. I'm attaching a little maven 2 project that builds an ear with a jar, war,

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2125) Classpath entries in the web app archive META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are not added to the wep app class path

2006-07-08 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2125?page=all ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2125: --- Attachment: manifestcp-itest.jar ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear The jar file contains an m2 project to build a test ear. Unpack, and in

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2173) Fix branches/1.1 (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) build

2006-07-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Fix branches/1.1 (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) build --- Key: GERONIMO-2173 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2173 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Security: public (Regular issues) Components: buildsystem Versions:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2175) etc/explicit_versions.properties should be automatically generated (or made unecessary)

2006-07-08 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
etc/explicit_versions.properties should be automatically generated (or made unecessary) --- Key: GERONIMO-2175 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2175 Project: Geronimo

Re: FYI: Planning to upgrade to Derby 10.1.3 for the Geronimo 1.1.1 release (GERONIMO-2155)

2006-07-08 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 7/7/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the Derby library does not have line number debug information mail thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to upgrade to the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2]. David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in