The only way currently is to register a MessageListener
(package org.apache.servicemix.event) on the JBIContainer.
It will intercept all exchanges, so you would have to filter those
of interest for you.
What's your use case ?
On 12/6/06, shravan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does servicemix offer
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-646?page=comments#action_12455911
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-646:
--
As of rev 482955 in branches\1.2
JAASJettyRealm.java
public boolean isUserInRole(Principal user,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1652?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-1652.
Resolution: Fixed
EJBModuleImpl.getEJBs() always return an empty array
Hi,
I am trying to build jetty6 assembly but it fails in modules-jetty6.
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
--
1) org.mortbay.jetty:jetty:jar:6.1-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the
Should jetty source be downloaded and built to get this jar.
I tried jetty-6.1.0pre0.jar but it gives compilation errors during
build of geronimo-jetty6 module.
Regards
Krish
On 12/6/06, Krishnakumar B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build jetty6 assembly but it fails in
it's supposed to be at the codehaus snapshot repo, and I have found
it there in the past. might be a temporary glitch
david jencks
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Krishnakumar B wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build jetty6 assembly but it fails in modules-jetty6.
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
Does servicemix offer a way to pre process a MessageExchange received by an
end point before the message is acted upon by a service unit?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pre-processing-of-messages-at-runtime-tf2767144s12049.html#a7716583
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2221?page=all ]
Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-2221:
Summary: java.lang.ClassCastException while installing Servlet Examples
(was: java.lang.ClassCastException while installing Servlet Examples
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1089?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-1089.
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
Resolution: Fixed
i believe this has already been resolved in the 4.2 trunk (r464216)
Warning when using multicast discoveryUri
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2583?page=comments#action_12455960
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2583:
I played around with this a bit and think we can solve it another way by moving
the geronimo-deploy-tool
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1089?page=all ]
Jonas Lim updated AMQ-1089:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.1
4.1.2
Description:
When using a transportconnector with a multicast discoveryagent a warning is
shown.
config:
Do we need this fix in branches\1.2 too?
--vamsi
On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Wed Dec 6 03:11:05 2006
New Revision: 483034
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=483034
Log:
Update module id name templates to reflect m2 re-organization:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2583?page=comments#action_12455990
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2583:
I think this should also work fine, there are number of ways in which we can
solve it, I think what we need
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1285?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-1285:
---
Attachment: consoleprint1285.patch
Patch consoleprint1285.patch prints the same for console. It prints started,
stopped, uninstalled and installed
I see the following xml fragment in modules\geronimo-connector\pom.xml
dependency
groupIdorg.tranql/groupId
artifactIdtranql/artifactId
scopetest/scope
exclusions
exclusion
groupIdcommons-logging/groupId
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1285?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-1285:
---
Assignee: (was: Rakesh Midha)
I did both the items I was thinking to do for this JIRA. Added patch for deploy
tool as well as console to prnt
Krish,
I see it here:
http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/mortbay/jetty/jetty/6.1-SNAPSHOT/
Joe
Krishnakumar B wrote:
I am not able to find this jar in codehaus. There is a
jetty-6.1.0pre3.jar but this gives compilation errors when building.
Any other suggestions.
Regards
Krish
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2594?page=comments#action_12456001
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2594:
--
Fixed in rev 483063. Mac users please verify that it works for you. Thnaks Joe
and Kevan! for
Is the latest offical version is 4.1 now? Just released this week?
nabble615 wrote:
Hi, may I know whether the latest official activemq release is 4.0.2? May
I know when is the released date of it as well? Thanks
--
View this message in context:
Tranql uses an older version of commons-logging than the one used by
the kernel. Maven gets confused about the versions if the same jar is
used in two different scopes:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Another-really-strange-mysterious-build-error-p6294043.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana
hi,
The build fails in jetty6 builder module with following error
Time to build schema type system: 1.011 seconds
BUILD FAILED
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
On 12/6/06, bluedolphin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the latest offical version is 4.1 now? Just released this week?
Yes.
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/download.html
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-14?page=all ]
Timothy Bish reassigned AMQCPP-14:
--
Assignee: Timothy Bish (was: Nathan Mittler)
CMSExpiration not handled properly in ActiveMQProducer
Upgrade to tomcat 6.0.2 beta
Key: GERONIMO-2628
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2628
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2402?page=comments#action_12456085
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2402:
---
Rakesh, in the patch you submitted i see the following:
{code}
+if (modules != null) {
I saw in the following link that James mentioned support for Tibco RV - did
this get anywhere? I'd be interested in trying it out.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Mike
--
View this message in context:
On 12/6/06, Mike Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw in the following link that James mentioned support for Tibco RV - did
this get anywhere? I'd be interested in trying it out.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Its a little
James wrote:
Its a little rough and ready - we could check it into the sandbox and
folks could play further. Am not 100% sure we'd be able to host it at
Apache though due to the licensing on the RV client API
OK, don't do work on this on my part yet because I'm not quite ready to try
it.
Chris,
For 2.0-M1 I am planning to upgrade geronimo modules/configs to use
1.1 specs. I could ask Jacek to apply an openejb patch for us. We need
to upgrade tranql also eventually.
Thanks
Anita
--- Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Content
---
Chris,
If you are setup to publish the specs, could you please publish
j2ee_management 1.1 spec.
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
For 2.0-M1 I am planning to upgrade geronimo modules/configs to
use
1.1 specs. I could ask Jacek to apply an openejb
Hi Vamsavardhana, No they're certainly not causing any problems--I was just curious about them more
than anything. I've been ignoring most of the smerge conflicts due to their omissions, but sounds
like they should be kept in sync so I'll take care of them if they're missing. Also, to address
Paul,
I can offer an antique fruitcake..., if you could publish the
management 1.1 specs. I am trying to figure out why my mvn deploy did
not go through. Without the SNAPSHOTs, the build is broken :(.
Thanks
Anita
Got some help on irc (thanks djencks). Just add the server to
Anita,
This sounds like an excellent plan! I'm getting the impression you've
done a lot of stuff already so please let me know what other missing
pieces you haven't covered so I can help.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Chris,
For 2.0-M1 I am planning to upgrade geronimo
That guide isn't too specific. Do you have a server entry similar to:
server
idapache.snapshots/id
usernamedjencks/username
passphrase***/passphrase
directoryPermissions775/directoryPermissions
filePermissions664/filePermissions
/server
Also before
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2548?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2548.
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Resolution: Fixed
GBeanInfo should exclude attributes and operations of java.lang.Object class
Anita,
I already published the management 1.1 spec for you. Please verify and
let me know if you get any problems.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Paul,
I can offer an antique fruitcake..., if you could publish the
management 1.1 specs. I am trying to figure out why my mvn
Complete Editor Support for specifying Dependencies, Hidden Classes, Non
Overridable Classes GBean References in geronimo-web.xml
---
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2402?page=comments#action_12456122
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2402:
---
I have tried the fix on branches\1.1 (not 1.2) , excluding the redundant else
if (modules !=
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2584?page=comments#action_12456145
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2584:
---
I have tried the patch on branches\1.1 (not 1.2) in combination with the fix
for GERONIMO-2402.
Shiva,
Please provide your JIRA id.
--vamsi
On 12/6/06, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been working on enhancing Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in for quite
sometime now (http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg35865.html
) and want to start contributing to the
FYI... soon we will have our automated build system deploying
nightly, as well as on demand.
This will help reduce issues caused by deployment w/bad umasks and a
few other issues (like accidentally using the wrong jdk,
accidentially deploying uncommitted changes, etc).
--jason
On Dec
That will be sweet!!
On 12/6/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI... soon we will have our automated build system deploying
nightly, as well as on demand.
This will help reduce issues caused by deployment w/bad umasks and a
few other issues (like accidentally using the wrong jdk,
opinion
I think it is really loopy that we have version information in
artifact ids. A few people outside of the group have mentioned this
too me too.
IMO it would be better if the artifact ids of the specs did not have
any version muck, and the version of that module was based on the
I agree. This practice has the feel of a shortcut around maven's
versioning system that we may regret taking later.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 12/6/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
opinion
I think it is really loopy that we have version information in
artifact ids. A few people outside
Done :) Welcome
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Hello,
I have been working on enhancing Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in for quite
sometime now (http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/
msg35865.html ) and want to start contributing to the source. Hence
request to
I dunno... I kinda like the artifact_v.v-mavenVersion as artifact-
v.v-mavenVersion seems more confusing. I'll have to noodle on it
though. I think the _ in the name clearly identifies the version
number as being related to the artifact content rather then the
version of the specs.
On
I think you missed the point sir :-P I was not talking about _ vs
- ...
I was suggesting that the v.v bits are you use below are whack, they
should not be needed... all versioning should be in mavenVersion.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I dunno... I kinda
We discussed this pretty extensively when we adopted this naming
scheme. I still think the current scheme is the best choice. My
reasoning behind this is that for code that we control we should have
a single version, such as 1.0, 1.1.2, 2.0, etc, but for code that is
based on something
sun j2ee schemas are being redistributed in jsp and servlet specs
-
Key: GERONIMO-2630
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2630
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
I agree for the jetty bits and the openejb bits, but not really for
the specs... especially with the per-module versioning of them.
Though if you follow the naming scheme for the others, its more like
jetty_5-* and openejb_2-* :-(
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:07 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Ok, but I still don't get the 'target' directories.
Where is maven supposed to put the output binaries to?
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Diego L Espiñeira wrote:
By the way, I'm on an Ubuntu Linux Desktop 6.10,
which doesn't use
bash
but
I have got the latest code from SVN. My build fails with following error
trace:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
import simple hello.war results xml-fragment tag in geronimo-web.xml
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-119
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-119
Project:
I think this may have removed a bit too much :-)
Now, when attempting to use the Web Console for any of the servers in
trunk we get a NoClassDefFoundError for a xerces class when we hit the
console welcome page. Paul avoided this on the tomcat 6 work by adding
a dependency in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-25:
--
Attachment: daytrader-25.schema.patch
Here is a patch to fix the schema files associated with DT-14 (built against
the 1.2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-25:
--
Attachment: daytrader-25.code.patch
This patch updates the quote price change algorithm to that described in my
previous
Looks like the MyFaces build 1.2 is using Continuum to automate their builds. It's
supposed to automatically publish their snapshots but they have discovered after my query
that it's doing a 'mvn install' instead of an 'mvn deploy'. So that's been fixed.
Unfortunately though the MyFaces 1.2
You ran `mvn -Dstage=bootstrap`... which does not build apps,
configs or assemblies.
Just run `mvn install`.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Diego Espineira wrote:
Ok, but I still don't get the 'target' directories.
Where is maven supposed to put the output binaries to?
---
Thanks to Rick, the pervasive NoClassDefFoundException in openejb
itests were fixed.
Tha plan openejb-jar.xml needed the ORBConfigAdapter gbean. It also
needed a dependency on the j2ee-corba-yoko config.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-399 fixes that issue.
We are now down to just
Ok, thanks. Then the tutorial has to be modified. It
is not that clear for a beginner. Or it wasn't just
for me :´(
Thanks for your attention
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
You ran `mvn -Dstage=bootstrap`... which does not
build apps,
configs or assemblies.
Just run `mvn
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-28?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-28:
--
Attachment: daytrader-28.patch
Here is a patch to remove all of the methods from the TradeJDBC.java file.
Un-needed methods in
On 12/5/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/5/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, Tomcat integration might have the most work to do for M1. How
is that looking?
I have the JSP 2.1 and EL 1.0 specs checked in and published to the
snapshot repo, reversioned to
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo-with-maven-2.html
It says Building for the first time
mvn -Dstage=bootstrap
and that's how I did.
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Which tutorial are you referring to?
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Diego
I've fixed the docs and set this page to only be editable by members
of geronimo-users. I also added a section under the default building
bits to explain the sections.
Folks, please take special care when making changes to guides like this.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Diego
Asyc 1-Phase mode should be removed
---
Key: DAYTRADER-29
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-29
Project: DayTrader
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: EJB Tier
Affects Versions:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-29?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-29:
--
Summary: Async 1-Phase mode should be removed (was: Asyc 1-Phase mode
should be removed)
Async 1-Phase mode should be removed
I'm not sure what you mean... you are seeing diffs or conflicts?
Normally svk will handle trivial diffs like this... so while it will
show up as a difference, there is no conflict, smerge should be able
to resolve this with no user interaction.
Or do you mean something else?
--jason
On
On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:34 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
One other question... Is it better to commit related changes to
branches\1.2 and trunk in a single revision? Does it help in any
manner?
From an svk perspective it does not matter.
--jason
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 12/6/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) I'm about to try using the new jasper with jetty. It seems like the
web console works fine with the jsp 2.0 support provided by jasper. I
think that it should equally do fine with the jsp 2.1 support from
jasper. I like
jetty5 builder needs to parameterize the jsp servlet class
--
Key: GERONIMO-2631
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2631
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2631?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2631.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 483251
jetty5 builder needs to parameterize the jsp servlet class
--
Hey Paul,
I just gave it a quick look. Things went pretty smoothly. Build fine,
ran fine, and the console seemed to work fine. As you already
mentioned there are a lot of info messages and the stacktraces on
terminating the server but these are not unique to tomcat at the moment.
The
Sorry, i get confused. Currently yes. The 4.1 release is still in voting?.
Is it mean that 4.1 still unofficially released?
Thanks
James.Strachan wrote:
On 11/28/06, nabble615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, may I know whether the latest official activemq release is 4.0.2?
Currently yes.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2575?page=comments#action_12456249
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-2575:
-
Someone please close this JIRA.
It is no longer true - The server will now start with Java 1.5 without
Hello,
I'm working on a Broker interceptor class that extends BrokerFilter.
After processing an incoming message, I would like to publish to a
topic that is determined from the content of the message.
My question is: is there a quicker way to publish to a topic from a
Broker than the
done.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Jay D. McHugh (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2575?
page=comments#action_12456249 ]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-2575:
-
Someone please close this JIRA.
It is no
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2575?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2575.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Server will now boot with 1.5 just fine
Starting Geronimo using Java 1.5 fails - Issue with xmlParserAPIs
Is there any special requirements to build this puppy? Does Eclipse
need to be installed or something?
I'm asking first... have not actually tried yet... but would like to
hook this up to automatically build if possible.
--jason
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-762?page=all ]
Jeff Puro reassigned SM-762:
Assignee: Jeff Puro
Address in WSDL is incorrectly adding the protocol information in the
begining of the URL
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-762?page=all ]
Work on SM-762 started by Jeff Puro.
Address in WSDL is incorrectly adding the protocol information in the
begining of the URL
-
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-762?page=all ]
Jeff Puro updated SM-762:
-
Attachment: servicemix-http-host-port-scheme.patch
This patch uses the request.getScheme() method to determine the protocol. I
have attached an alternative that uses
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-762?page=all ]
Jeff Puro updated SM-762:
-
Attachment: servicemix-http-host-port-is-secure.patch
The attached patch uses the isSecure() method to determine the protocol (http
or https) as used in other places in
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-762?page=comments#action_37640 ]
Jeff Puro commented on SM-762:
--
I have attached two different patches. Either one will resolve the issue. It
is up to the commiter to decide which to use:
1) The
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
We are now down to just 2 failures and 2 errors on the Openejb-2.3
itests. The stack trace is here -- http://rifers.org/paste/show/2622
org.apache.openejb.test.TestFailureException : null; nested exception
is:
Connection errors can result in infinite loop
-
Key: GERONIMO-2632
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2632
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
4.1.0 has been officially released :-)
-Brian
On Dec 6, 2006, at 2:40 PM, bluedolphin wrote:
Sorry, i get confused. Currently yes. The 4.1 release is still in
voting?.
Is it mean that 4.1 still unofficially released?
Thanks
James.Strachan wrote:
On 11/28/06, nabble615 [EMAIL
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2632?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2632.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 483310. in trunk only
Connection errors can result in infinite loop
-
SVK synchronization patch for 12-06-2006
Key: GERONIMO-2633
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2633
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2633?page=all ]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2633:
Attachment: GERONIMO-2633.patch
SVK synchronization patch for 12-06-2006
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2633?page=all ]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2633:
Description:
Minor synchronization updates to the following files to keep Branch 1.2 and
Trunk in synch:
Index:
Switch to activemq 4.1.0-incubator: include apache incubator repo in our repo
list.
---
Key: GERONIMO-2634
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2634
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2634?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2634.
--
Resolution: Fixed
trunk rev 483315
1.2 rev 483318
Switch to activemq 4.1.0-incubator: include apache incubator repo in our repo
list.
Upgrade to JavaMail 1.4 and JavaBeans Activation Framework 1.1
--
Key: GERONIMO-2635
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2635
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
Hi Jason, it builds fine for me just using the mvn clean install command. I have Eclipse
installed but don't think that matters...
Tim
Jason Dillon wrote:
Is there any special requirements to build this puppy? Does Eclipse
need to be installed or something?
I'm asking first... have not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2635?page=comments#action_12456283
]
Christopher M. Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2635:
--
trunk - Revision: 483324
Upgrade to JavaMail 1.4 and JavaBeans Activation Framework 1.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2633?page=all ]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2633:
Description:
Minor synchronization updates to the following files to keep Branch 1.2 and
Trunk in synch:
Index:
Hi Patrick,
What I could suggest is to use JmsTemplate to send messages and possibly
Spring based configurations. See unit test SpringTest.java and
SpringProducer.java located in
${activemq.source.home}\activemq-core\src\test\java\org\apache\activemq\spring\
for reference.
Regards,
Fritz
David Jencks wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:27 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Jetty 6 as currently integrated in trunk is still using the JSP 2.0
support from jasper (tomcat 5.5.15). To support jetty for the
2.0-M1 milestone we will need a JSP
Question: Does anyone have an example of a either a new JAR or an updated JAR that is
being integrated in this first Milestone ?? Reason I ask is that I have the JSF jars
integrated fine in the build, but just want to verify that I have changed everything that
should be changed before I try to
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-11-05 18:03:59 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
