Thanks Eric, this will help for the time being. But I think I still need
to explore more.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dofonsou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 3:52 PM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to embed servicemix
COuld this be
Hi All,
I am very new to using Servicemix. If anyone could point me to some
useful docs for using Servicemix in web applications (we're using Tomcat
server for our applications), it would be of great help. I have gone
through the site 'http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix' but I could
not
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Freeman Fang reassigned SM-1059:
Assignee: Freeman Fang
Upgrade to CXF 2.0.2
Key: SM-1059
What's the correct Geronimo Schema for EJB (JAR)? Is it not
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0 ??
- Shiva
On 9/18/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and
2.0
You can take a quick look at the
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 576762 built with tests included
See the full build-0400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070918/build-0400.log
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/prasad
Does not work right-clik's option Remove to remove project from Server
(Servers View)
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215
URL:
Transaction recovery broken for resource adapter
Key: GERONIMO-3477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3477
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
I've been working on adding an IMAP implementation to the Geronimo
javamail implementation and need an opinion on how to approach
compatibility with the Sun IMAP implementation.
The Sun version of IMAP includes a number of extensions that are above
and beyond what's defined by the javamail
Allow the File Binding Component to work in append mode
-
Key: SM-1058
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1058
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528363
]
Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215:
Tomasz,
What kind of J2EE application did you
+1
--vamsi
On 9/15/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.0.0
RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release).
The deployable zip file is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528367
]
Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215:
---
It concerns running: ear-application (that
On 9/17/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some more observations while testing Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3):
a) When defining a new server, Apache Geronimo v1.2 Server doesn't get
listed in the list of available servers.
b) Looks like WTP 2.0.1RC2 has solved the problem
Thanks for updating it.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Yes, that's right. I updated the schema files to point to Java EE ones.
Jarek
On 9/17/07, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.0 page isn't quite right -- the preferred J2EE schemas on the
top right should name and point to
I talked with Dave Blevins about this, maybe I got it wrong. Dave can you take
a look at this?
Cheers!
Hernan
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
What's the correct Geronimo Schema for EJB (JAR)? Is it not
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0 ??
- Shiva
On 9/18/07, *Hernan Cunico*
After jarek said he was able to build using 1.5.0_10, I tried using that but
ran into the same error :(
Vamsi
On 9/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I am the only one for now hitting this build error. Anyone else
seeing this error? Output from command window posted
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 576935 built with tests included
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070918/build-1000.log
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-jaxws:2.0.2-SNAPSHOT:
checking for updates from codehaus
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 576935 built with tests included
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070918/build-1000.log
[WARNING] Unable to get resource
'org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-persistence-jdbc:jar:1.0.0' from repository
Hi Toby,
Although we are going that that direction, most of the samples on the wiki are
not yet in svn.
For now, while we still have a mixed environment, you could either attach the
fixed sample directly to the wiki page or attach it to this thread and I'll
update the wiki page for you.
Let
+1
Lin
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.0.0 RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release).
The deployable zip file is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-206:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Error while
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-204:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Change pre-requisite from current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-215:
---
Description:
Hi Tomasz, Sorry to be so dense but I'm missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-208:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Always appends default value into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Fictional deployment of EJB-JAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico resolved GERONIMO-3425.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Updated updated with XML Schemas for 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
Folks,
checking the referenced online books on the web site I noticed that many of
these are way too old and probably not relevant anymore.
Does anyone has some fresh material to update this page -
http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html
I'll be doing some makeup on the wiki links
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico reassigned GERONIMO-3425:
---
Assignee: Hernan Cunico
Add deployment plan schemas to geronimo web site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico closed GERONIMO-3425.
---
Resolved.
Add deployment plan schemas to geronimo web site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico closed GERONIMO-1113.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This functionality is now available via Geronimo plugins. Plugins can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller_plugin_070918.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528545
]
ppe edited comment on GERONIMO-2994 at 9/18/07 1:26 PM:
Roller plugin updates
Upgrade to CXF 2.0.2
Key: SM-1059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1059
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-jsr181
Affects Versions: 3.2
Just a gentle reminder if anyone would still like to vote for this release..
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.0.0 RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release).
The deployable zip file is here:
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 577041 built with tests included
See the full build-1600.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070918/build-1600.log
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/prasad
I'm thinking about making a few improvements to the plugin management
portlets in the admin console. These ppt charts illustrate what I
have in mind. Feedback is welcome!
http://people.apache.org/~pmcmahan/new_plugin_portlets.ppt
Best wishes,
Paul
Hey Paul, can't see some of the images. Is that a Mac kind of thing !? :-P
OpenOffice shows big black blocks. Maybe its just the screenshots.
Other than that I really like the proposed updates, will make plugins a lot
easier to maintain.
Once done with this change maybe we should a new section
Hiya folks... just a quick update on GShell muck...
I've been madly hacking on the remote shell support for the past week
and well, its really close to being functional. I initially was
going to implement a POC over ActiveMQ but that was pissing me off
soo much that I decided to peek at
+1
Anita
--- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse
Plugin 2.0.0
RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release).
The deployable zip file is here:
I have not tested, but source and binaries look good...
+1
--kevan
Mulitple URISyntaxException getting plugins from another server
---
Key: GERONIMO-3478
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3478
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Shiva, thanks for the information. I'm not sure I feel comfortable modifying
a user's eclipse.ini file, especially without their knowledge. What I think we
should do though is include these settings in the release notes for this
release, and possibly on the updated website for the
Apache
True. We should document the changes needed in the ini file instead of
making the changes automatically.
Vamsi
On 9/19/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shiva, thanks for the information. I'm not sure I feel comfortable
modifying
a user's eclipse.ini file, especially without
43 matches
Mail list logo
