[jira] Assigned: (SM-1069) JAX-WS support

2007-09-27 Thread Freeman Fang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Freeman Fang reassigned SM-1069:


Assignee: Freeman Fang

 JAX-WS support
 --

 Key: SM-1069
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1069
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Freeman Fang
 Fix For: 4.0


 It should be easy to expose a JAX-WS annotated bean on the bus, or even 
 outside using http/soap ...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-926) Add a standard JBI component for Velocity templates

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-926:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)

 Add a standard JBI component for Velocity templates
 ---

 Key: SM-926
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-926
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Jeff Puro
Assignee: Jeff Puro
Priority: Minor
   Original Estimate: 2 days
  Remaining Estimate: 2 days

 I think it would be useful for ServiceMix to provide a velocity template 
 service engine.  This would serve as an alternative to using XSLT to tranform 
 messages and could be particularly useful when creating the content of an 
 email message etc.  The way it would work, in conjunction with JDOM, is that 
 a normalized message would be sent to the component that would inject the 
 properties and the content of the message into the Velocity context.  You can 
 then use Velocity's syntax for generating XML documents or any content that 
 has CDATA tags around it.  The properties of the normalized message would be 
 accessed via the $properties variable, whereas the content of the message 
 would be accessed via either a $content or $root variable using JDOM methods. 
  Since it is often nice to have Velocity templates pulled from sources other 
 than a .vm file (for example a database), it would be useful for the 
 velocity:endpoint/ to have a pluggable resource property where the resource 
 could be pulled from either the filesystem, a database, etc...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-679) Create a servicemix-ehcache standard JBI component

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-679:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)

 Create a servicemix-ehcache standard JBI component
 --

 Key: SM-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-679
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: servicemix-components
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Jeff Puro
Assignee: Jeff Puro
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: servicemix-ehcache.patch


 Add a servicemix-ehcache standard JBI component.  Please see the following 
 forum thread for more information on how this component should work.
 http://www.nabble.com/Ehcache-Standard-JBI-Component-tf2747953s12049.html#a7666554

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-848) ServiceMix 3.x with Java 1.4.x

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-848:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
   3.1.3

 ServiceMix 3.x with Java 1.4.x
 --

 Key: SM-848
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-848
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: Java Runtime Environment 1.4.x
Reporter: Juergen Mayrbaeurl
 Fix For: 3.1.3


 Since ServiceMix 3.1 can only be used with Java 5 or higher, rework it to 
 make it Java 1.4.x compatible

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (SM-750) ClientFactory should implement java.io.Serializable

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40194
 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-750:


Did you find a solution for that ?

 ClientFactory should implement java.io.Serializable
 ---

 Key: SM-750
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-750
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-core
 Environment: All, especially when running under the JBoss Deployer
Reporter: Martin Landua
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.2


 The object ClientFactory should implement the interface java.io.Serializable. 
 Otherwise, the JBoss Deployer throws an error when trying to register the 
 object in the JBoss JNDI directory.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



XMLStreamException processing request

2007-09-27 Thread Reddy, Koti
Hi,
 We are getting the error below for every request. Response is coming back
after having couple of errors like this. Any idea where this is coming from?
We are using Jetty6.1.3 in the HTTP BC.
 
Even with Jetty6.0.1 also we have same problem. It looks like it's a problem
with Continuation. Is there any way we can disable continuation?
 
 
javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException
 at
com.ctc.wstx.sw.BaseNsStreamWriter.doWriteAttr(BaseNsStreamWriter.java:469)
 at
com.ctc.wstx.sw.BaseNsStreamWriter.writeAttribute(BaseNsStreamWriter.java:22
9)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.jaxp.XMLStreamHelper.writeStartElement(XMLStreamHe
lper.java:169)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.jaxp.XMLStreamHelper.copy(XMLStreamHelper.java:59)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.marshalers.SoapWriter.writeContents(SoapWriter.ja
va:198)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.marshalers.SoapWriter.writeSoapEnvelope(SoapWrite
r.java:190)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.marshalers.SoapWriter.writeSimpleMessage(SoapWrit
er.java:99)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.marshalers.SoapWriter.write(SoapWriter.java:82)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.http.processors.ConsumerProcessor.processResponse(Cons
umerProcessor.java:223)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.http.processors.ConsumerProcessor.process(ConsumerProc
essor.java:204)
 at
org.apache.servicemix.http.HttpBridgeServlet.doPost(HttpBridgeServlet.java:7
1)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:810)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:487)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:367)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712)
 at
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerColl
ection.java:211)
 at
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:11
4)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:285)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:502)
 at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:372)
 at
org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:368)
 at
org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector$RetryContinuation.run(SelectCha
nnelConnector.java:489)
 at
org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:4
42)


Re: integration testing in spring

2007-09-27 Thread James Strachan
BTW I've added an integration test for the bridge sample...

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/bridge/bridge-sa-itest/

which from a single spring XML boots up an ActiveMQ broker, ServiceMix
with some components and the SA and then Camel to do some integration
testing (though I've not yet completed the Camel stuff to fire
messages into the bridge then do some Mock endpoint testing to ensure
things work as expected).


On 25/09/2007, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've taken a first stab at adding an easy way of integration testing
 JBI artifacts (shared libraries, components and service assemblies)
 using a simple Spring XML notation that can be included into any JUnit
 test case...

 http://cwiki.apache.org/SM/integration-testing-in-spring.html

 This allows you to depend on artifacts using their maven groupId and
 artifactId and then the version is inferred (using the generated
 META-INF/maven/dependencies.properties via the jbi-maven-plugin).

 My idea was to show how we can boot up servicemix with some artifacts
 from the local repo, then use Camel to fire in messages and make
 assertions and so forth to test that the JBI artifacts actually deploy
 correctly and do what is expected etc.

 Feedback most appreciated if this can be improved...


 --
 James
 ---
 http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

 Open Source SOA
 http://open.iona.com



-- 
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com


[jira] Resolved: (SM-750) ClientFactory should implement java.io.Serializable

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-750.


Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Closing this issue.  Please open another one if there are still problems.

 ClientFactory should implement java.io.Serializable
 ---

 Key: SM-750
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-750
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-core
 Environment: All, especially when running under the JBoss Deployer
Reporter: Martin Landua
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.2


 The object ClientFactory should implement the interface java.io.Serializable. 
 Otherwise, the JBoss Deployer throws an error when trying to register the 
 object in the JBoss JNDI directory.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1011) WSDLFlattenner / SchemaCollection do not handle nested schemas inclusions properly

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1011.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1.3
 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Thx a lot for this patch !

Sending
servicemix-common/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/common/tools/wsdl/SchemaCollection.java
Sending
servicemix-common/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/common/tools/wsdl/WSDLFlattenerTest.java
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-a1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b2.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b3.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-c1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/service.wsdl
Transmitting file data 
Committed revision 580017.

Sending
servicemix-common/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/common/tools/wsdl/SchemaCollection.java
Sending
servicemix-common/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/common/tools/wsdl/WSDLFlattenerTest.java
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-a1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b2.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-b3.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/nested-c1.xsd
Adding servicemix-common/src/test/resources/includes/service.wsdl
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 580018.

 WSDLFlattenner / SchemaCollection do not handle nested schemas inclusions 
 properly
 --

 Key: SM-1011
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1011
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-common
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
 Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: Konrad Argasinski
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.3, 3.2

 Attachments: nested schemas.txt, nested-schemas-reproduced-sm.zip


 WSDLFlattener fails to analyse JSR-181 SU WSDL which imports multi-level 
 (nested) schemas structure.
 My JSR-181 SU WSDL imports A1.xsd schema. A1.xsd includes B1.xsd, B2.xsd and 
 B3.xsd. B1.xsd includes C1.xsd.
 The schema is used by JAXB during the project build and it works ok, however 
 when the SU gets deployed on ServiceMix I receive following error:
 loc-messageNOT_FOUND_ERR: An attempt is made to reference a node in a 
 context where it does not exist./loc-message
 stack-trace![CDATA[org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NOT_FOUND_ERR: An attempt is 
 made to reference a node in a context where it does not exist.
   at org.apache.xerces.dom.ParentNode.internalRemoveChild(Unknown Source)
   at org.apache.xerces.dom.ParentNode.removeChild(Unknown Source)
   at 
 org.apache.servicemix.common.tools.wsdl.SchemaCollection.handleImports(SchemaCollection.java:150)
 The full stack trace is attached.
 As workaround I compiled my custom SchemaCollection and it works ok now, 
 however I think a better fix is needed.
 My custom changes in org.apache.servicemix.common.tools.wsdl.SchemaCollection 
 are:
 around line 149 I have replaced:
   String location = ce.getAttribute(schemaLocation);
 schema.getRoot().removeChild(ce);
 with:
   String location = ce.getAttribute(schemaLocation);
   Node parentNode = ce.getParentNode();
   Element root = schema.getRoot();
   if (root == parentNode) {
  log.debug(Removing child include node:  + ce);
  schema.getRoot().removeChild(ce);
   } else {
log.warn(Skipping child include node removal:  + ce);
   }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-855) Non concurrent processing of files in LW FilePoller

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-855:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)

Unscheduling this issue until a correct patch is provided

 Non concurrent processing of files in LW FilePoller
 ---

 Key: SM-855
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-855
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-components
Affects Versions: 3.1
Reporter: Juergen Mayrbaeurl
 Attachments: FilePoller.diff, FilePoller.diff


 LW FilePoller component always processes files concurrently. Sometimes it's 
 very important that files get processed in a defined sequence, because the 
 contents is depending on previously processed contents.
 I've extended the LW FilePoller class. It has a 'concurrent' property now 
 (default is true) and properties for sorting the incoming files (Sort by name 
 and last modification date, asc and desc)
 Maybe this functionality should be included in the LW FTP FilePoller and 
 servicemix-file BC, too.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Scheduling 3.2 release

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I'm going through the remaining JIRA assigned for 3.2.
If anybody has any important issues to schedule there (or patches to
apply), please yell !
I'd like to put 3.2 in release mode asap.

-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/


[jira] Resolved: (SM-981) Transaction Exception due to ServiceMix JMS Provider

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-981.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1.3
 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Thanks a lot for this patch!

Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/jca/JcaProviderProcessor.java
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 580020.

Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/jca/JcaProviderProcessor.java
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 580023.

 Transaction Exception due to ServiceMix JMS Provider
 

 Key: SM-981
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-981
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-jms
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: All platforms. The bug was encountered on ServiceMix 3.1 
 running in JBoss against JBossMQ.
Reporter: Martin Landua
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.3, 3.2

 Attachments: servicemix-jms.patch


 Hi all,
 under heavy load, we have encountered a problem when writing messages using 
 the JMS provider in a synchronous, transactional flow.
 The problem is that in the code (lines 100 and up)
 producer.send(msg);
 exchange.setStatus(ExchangeStatus.DONE);
 channel.send(exchange);
 } finally {
 if (session != null) {
 session.close();
 }
 if (connection != null) {
 connection.close();
 }
 }
 it is possible that the DONE state would return to the originator faster than 
 the session and the connection is closed in the finally section. If this 
 happens, the originator (and therefore owner of the transaction) will first 
 commit and after this the provider would close the connection.
 This results in a transaction exception.
 From what we can tell, it should read like this:
 producer.send(msg);
 } finally {
 if (session != null) {
 session.close();
 }
 if (connection != null) {
 connection.close();
 }
 }
 exchange.setStatus(ExchangeStatus.DONE);
 channel.send(exchange);
 due to which we guarantee that the connection is safely closed before we send 
 the confirmation back to the consumer.
 All of our load tests succeeded after this change.
 Best regards
 Martin Landua

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-998) In-Out Exchanges in a JMS queue cannot be successfully processed after a crash/shutdown

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-998.


Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Thx a lot for this great patch!

Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/AbstractJmsProcessor.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/JmsEndpoint.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/multiplexing/MultiplexingProviderProcessor.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/standard/StandardProviderProcessor.java
Transmitting file data 
Committed revision 580043.

 In-Out Exchanges in a JMS queue cannot be successfully processed after a 
 crash/shutdown
 ---

 Key: SM-998
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-998
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-jms
Affects Versions: 3.2
 Environment: any
Reporter: Sam Gerstein
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: servicemix-jms_patch.txt

   Original Estimate: 0 minutes
  Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes

 Because a temporary queue is used for the reply-to destination and the 
 Exchange is stored in an in-memory Map, In-Out message exchanges in a JMS 
 queue cannot be returned to their sender after a crash or shutdown of 
 ServiceMix.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1054) Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component to servicemix-jms component

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1054:


Patch Info: [Patch Available]

 Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component  to servicemix-jms component
 -

 Key: SM-1054
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-jms
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
Reporter: Jeff Peterson
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: SM-1054.patch


 Many legacy JMS systems have non-xml messages (e.g. ObjectMessage) floating 
 around on their queues and topics.  The servicemix-jms component needs a way 
 to marshall those jms messages to normalized messages.  
 The lightweight jms component currently has a marshaller layer to perform 
 these actions.  Please port it to the servicemix-jms component.
 See: 
 http://www.nabble.com/MapMessage-and-or-ObjectMessage-tf2226788s12049.html#a6188688

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1054) Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component to servicemix-jms component

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1054.
-

Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Thx a lot for this patch!

Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/AbstractJmsProcessor.java
Adding 
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/DefaultJmsMarshaler.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/JmsEndpoint.java
Adding 
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/JmsMarshaler.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/jca/JcaProviderProcessor.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/multiplexing/MultiplexingProviderProcessor.java
Sending
servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/standard/StandardProviderProcessor.java
Adding 
servicemix-jms/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms/JmsMarshalerTest.java
Transmitting file data 
Committed revision 580069.

 Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component  to servicemix-jms component
 -

 Key: SM-1054
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-jms
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
Reporter: Jeff Peterson
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: SM-1054.patch


 Many legacy JMS systems have non-xml messages (e.g. ObjectMessage) floating 
 around on their queues and topics.  The servicemix-jms component needs a way 
 to marshall those jms messages to normalized messages.  
 The lightweight jms component currently has a marshaller layer to perform 
 these actions.  Please port it to the servicemix-jms component.
 See: 
 http://www.nabble.com/MapMessage-and-or-ObjectMessage-tf2226788s12049.html#a6188688

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-930) ComponentListener does not get notified on Component uninstall

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-930.


Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Thx a lot for this patch!

Sending
servicemix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/framework/ComponentMBeanImpl.java
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 580070.

 ComponentListener does not get notified on Component uninstall
 --

 Key: SM-930
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-930
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-core
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: Ubuntu-64, Java 1.5_06, ServiceMix-3.1-incubating
Reporter: Corey Baswell
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: patch.txt


 The org.apache.servicemix.jbi.event.ComponentListener does not get notified 
 when a component in the JBI container is uninstalled:
 public void componentUninstalled(ComponentEvent event);
 I attached a patch for how i got it working.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-575) servicemix-common base classes are not designed to support persistent deployments

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-575:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)

 servicemix-common base classes are not designed to support persistent 
 deployments
 -

 Key: SM-575
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-575
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-common
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet

 The Deployer and BaseServiceUnitManager should be enhanced for that.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Closed: (SM-2) component for ActiveSOAP

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet closed SM-2.


Resolution: Won't Fix

 component for ActiveSOAP
 

 Key: SM-2
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-2
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: James Strachan



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Closed: (SM-197) Eclipse Plugin to configure ServiceMix Integrations

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet closed SM-197.
--

Resolution: Won't Fix

Cimero will be donated to Eclipse STP

 Eclipse Plugin to configure ServiceMix Integrations
 ---

 Key: SM-197
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-197
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: George Gastaldi

 Develop an eclipse plugin that could allow editing of the servicemix 
 configuration file and visual representation of the flow.
 Please add comments regarding to the scope of this plug-in.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Closed: (SM-50) make a standard JBI component example

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet closed SM-50.
-

Resolution: Fixed

Done a long time ago

 make a standard JBI component example
 -

 Key: SM-50
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-50
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: James Strachan



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Closed: (SM-157) Create a Transformation Service Engine

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet closed SM-157.
--

Resolution: Fixed

Done with saxon

 Create a Transformation Service Engine
 --

 Key: SM-157
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-157
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet

 Standard JBI Service Engine.
 Handle XSLT, XQuery with saxon.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1037) Geronimo Plugin enhancement and bug fix

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1037.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Hi Kristian, thx a lot for this patch.
and keep up the good work :-)

Sendinggeronimo/deployer/pom.xml
Sendinggeronimo/deployer/src/plan/geronimo-service.xml
Sendinggeronimo/deployer-service/pom.xml
Sending
geronimo/deployer-service/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/geronimo/ServiceMixConfigBuilder.java
Sendinggeronimo/geronimo-plugins.xml
Sendinggeronimo/pom.xml
Sendinggeronimo/servicemix/pom.xml
Sendinggeronimo/servicemix/src/plan/geronimo-service.xml
Sendinggeronimo/servicemix-service/pom.xml
Sending
geronimo/servicemix-service/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/geronimo/ServiceMixGBean.java
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 580072.

 Geronimo Plugin enhancement and bug fix
 ---

 Key: SM-1037
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1037
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Kristian Koehler
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: geronimo-plugin.patch, geronimo-plugin.patch, 
 geronimo-plugin.patch-03, geronimo-plugin.patch-04


 Hi
 i encountered some problems with the Geronimo Plugin for ServiceMix. I 
 updated the version in trunk to use Geronimo 2.0.1 and fixed a deployment 
 bug. 
 With the current version it's not possible to deploy service assemblies which 
 require a deployment to a service unit. 
 For example if you deploy JBI ODE BPEL engine package via the JBI deployment 
 mechanism to geronimo you are not able to deploy a service unit using this 
 BPEL engine. The deployment ends up in jbi out of sync exceptions because 
 the service assembly must also be deployt to the service assembly! 
 The attached patch fixes the Deployer and some ServiceMix Service problems.
 Kristian

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1037) Geronimo Plugin enhancement and bug fix

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1037:


Component/s: geronimo

 Geronimo Plugin enhancement and bug fix
 ---

 Key: SM-1037
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1037
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: geronimo
Reporter: Kristian Koehler
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: geronimo-plugin.patch, geronimo-plugin.patch, 
 geronimo-plugin.patch-03, geronimo-plugin.patch-04


 Hi
 i encountered some problems with the Geronimo Plugin for ServiceMix. I 
 updated the version in trunk to use Geronimo 2.0.1 and fixed a deployment 
 bug. 
 With the current version it's not possible to deploy service assemblies which 
 require a deployment to a service unit. 
 For example if you deploy JBI ODE BPEL engine package via the JBI deployment 
 mechanism to geronimo you are not able to deploy a service unit using this 
 BPEL engine. The deployment ends up in jbi out of sync exceptions because 
 the service assembly must also be deployt to the service assembly! 
 The attached patch fixes the Deployer and some ServiceMix Service problems.
 Kristian

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1081) A StaticRecipientListAggregator like SplitAggregator is needed

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1081:


Fix Version/s: 3.2

 A StaticRecipientListAggregator like SplitAggregator  is needed
 ---

 Key: SM-1081
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1081
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-eip
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
 Environment: ServiceMix 3.1.1
Reporter: Andrea Zoppello
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: RecipientListAggregator.java, 
 SplitAggregator.java.patch, StaticRecipientList.java.patch


 We need a specific aggregator to use in couple with a Static recipient List.
 To do this we need to:
 1) Modify the static recipient list to propagate some information needed to 
 be used by RecipientListAggregator
 2) Implement the RecipientListAggregator class
 3) With a small update to SplitAggregator class RecipientListAggregator could 
 simply extend SplitAggregator to reuse
 the aggregation logic. The problem is that the Expression properties are 
 private, so we need to change SplitAgggregator.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use

2007-09-27 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530638
 ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3481:


I didn't get a chance to try it but the -for-2.0.patch looks fine to me.  Have 
you checked that the (2) hack is really necessary with (1)?  The code in 
Configuration looked right to me for handling transitive deps but I might 
be missing something.

 Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-3481
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.x, 2.1
 Environment: G 2.0.1 - Running multiple instances
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: David Jencks
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1

 Attachments: GERONIMO-3481-1.patch, GERONIMO-3481-2.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-2a.patch, GERONIMO-3481-3.patch, GERONIMO-3481-for-2.0.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch


 Offline deployer throws Bind Exception when port 1099 is in use.  Here is a 
 scenario steps in which the problem is experienced.
 1.  Extract G-2.0.1-Tomcat distro to C:\
 2.  Create a dir myserver under C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1 and copy 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\var to 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var (all sub-directories).
 3.  Edit 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var\config-substitutions.properties to 
 set PortOffset=10.
 4.  Open a command window and start Geronimo.  Since 
 org.apache.geronimo.server.name is not set, this will start the default 
 server instance.
 5.  Open a second command window, set 
 GERONIMO_OPTS=-Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.name=myserver.  This will be 
 command window to run the second server instance with name myserver
 6.  Run deploy.bat --offline list-modules.
 At step 6, I am getting a BIND Exception since port 1099 is in use (by the 
 default server instance) and the offline deployer is attempting to start rmi 
 naming on port 1099.  Since, this deploy command is run against second server 
 instance, I would expect that it uses the configuration properties of 
 myserver in which case it should use port 1109 to start rmi-naming if at 
 all there is a need.  When port 1099 is not in use, the offline deployer 
 works as expected by updating proper config.xml file when a configuration is 
 deployed/undeployed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3489) Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures

2007-09-27 Thread Shiva Kumar H R (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530643
 ] 

Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3489:
---

Thanks Ted for raising this. I have hit this problem many a times when 
deploying from within Eclipse Plug-in. I use Windows XP + NTFS + Sun JDK 
1.5.0_11.

 Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3489
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1
Reporter: Ted Kirby
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1


 File.delete() failures in IOUtil.recursiveDelete() are causing various 
 deployment problems.  I open this JIRA to discuss them to see how the server 
 might better handle them.  In all but one case, delete failures are not even 
 noted with a log record!  Deletion problems are seen in many environments and 
 platforms, but they are persistently fatal when using a NFS file system for 
 the repository.
 In investigating the problem, I have added code to recursiveDelete to retry 
 the delete a few times if it fails.  I added code to list directory contents 
 if a directory delete failed, and saw a file named 
 .nfs2bc4350053e in the directory.  My first attempt at a bypass 
 was to retry a failed delete 5 times, sleeping a second before each try.  
 This did not work.  I added a call to System.gc() before each sleep, and this 
 got me passed the problem.  Interestingly, two retries were required to get 
 this to work.  In another version, each retry was a second longer, and I 
 printed all file names in a directory before trying the delete.  This worked 
 in most cases, but required the full 5 retries, so I suspect System.gc() 
 would have time.  System.runFinalization() would be something else to try.
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) shows the 
 failing end of the deletion problem, with the dreaded 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException(Configuration already exists:  + 
 configId)exception.  I think this message is not good.  It should really say 
 directory already exists.  If the file is not deleted on undeploy, this 
 failure occurs on a subsequent deploy.  What is really bad is if the user 
 invokes a redeploy operation, and the file delete fails on the undeploy.  It 
 is important that undeploy not complete until the file goes away.
 From other environments, I am not convinced that all file handles and 
 references, and particularly open streams, are being closed on some 
 artifacts.  This will cause the delete to fail.  It may be that the gc() 
 calls are cleaning these up, and allowing the deletes to work in my case 
 above.
 Another option is that 
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) not throw a 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException if the only problem is an empty directory 
 structure exists.  The next line creates the directory structure anyway.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: Geronimo box on Download page still says 1.1

2007-09-27 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
Yes Hernan, let's create our own boxes.

Found these useful tutorials upon Google search for software box:
http://tutorialblog.org/create-a-software-box/
http://www.designtutorials.info/software-box-design/

Adobe Photoshop is used in both the tutorials.

- Shiva

On 9/26/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Shiva,
 The .psd you see there are the templates we used as guidelines long time
 ago then we overhauled the whole site.

 We don't have the source files for the boxed images and I have no idea
 what software was used to create them. We rely on asking other projects to
 help us with this update. I asked several times what was the software used
 but never get a reply.

 I don't check all the commits and I was certainly unaware that those files
 got finally committed. If we can't get the source nor the details on how
 these boxed images got created then we should consider creating a new set of
 images. What you guys think?

 Cheers!
 Hernan

 Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
  I also see some .psd files! in the same location. Must be the source for
  those boxes. Hernan can you try opening them with your Adobe Photoshop?
 
  - Shiva
 
  On 9/26/07, * Vamsavardhana Reddy* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hernan,
 
  I see some 2.0 box images at
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art and they
  have been there since end of March!!  Can you update the downloads
  page to show a 2.0 box?
 
  Vamsi
 
  On 8/22/07, *Hernan Cunico*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I've been trying for ages to get these updated. I asked folks
  from other projects using similar boxes but couldn't figure out
  what software they were using.
 
  All I have is the Photoshop suit but I'm sure those were created
  with something else.
 
  Cheers!
  Hernan
 
  Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Does anyone know how to get an updated box for Geronimo that
 says
2.0.1?  Since its the first thing people see on that page
  seems like it
would make more sense for the release number to be the most
  recent.  I'm
happy to do it but not sure what software was used.
   
 
 
 



Re: Updates to Apache Geronimo Development Tools Subproject website

2007-09-27 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
Tim,
Thanks for the updates. Below are some more:

9) In Release Notes
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-2.0.0.txt
We must mention (may be under Requirements: section) the changes required in
eclipse.ini if users are using Sun JDK 1.5.0_11.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg51412.html)

10) There is no mention! of
http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/RC3/build.xml. As you were
pointing out on the other thread, it will be good idea to create a wiki page
for Install  Get Started instructions and capture all information in
http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/RC3/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.0.0_Instructions-RC3.txtincluding
the availability of
build.xml, and put a link to it from
http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html

11) One more help Tim ;) Under News section of
http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html please change the title of
Above presentation updated for Geronimo 2.0.1 to Above presentation
updated for Java EE 5.0  Geronimo 2.0.1.

Between are there any instructions on how to update our website? I would
like to add my name under http://geronimo.apache.org/committers.html ;)

Thanks,
Shiva

On 9/27/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
  Great. Thanks Tim.
 
  Some minor corrections required to the website:
  1) Prerequisites section currently says,
 1. Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5)
 2. Europa (also known as Eclipse 3.3), which is platform specific
 3. Web Tools Platform (WTP) 2.0.1
 4. Data Tools Platform (DTP) 1.5
 5. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) 2.3
 6. Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) 3.3
  Should be:
 1. Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5)
 2. Eclipse 3.3.1 (Eclipse Classic package of Europa distribution),
  which is platform specific
 3. Web Tools Platform (WTP) 2.0.1
 4. Data Tools Platform (DTP) 1.5.1
 5. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) 2.3.1
 6. Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) 3.3.1
  This was discussed earlier also. Please see
  http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg51362.html
 

 Done

  2) In Downloads: Latest Release - Version 2.0.0 section:
   release notes
  
 http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-2.0.0.txt
 
  link points to a non-existing document.
 

 Done, but I hope you can review the release notes as well, since you had
 requested specific content.

  3) In Installation Alternatives section:
  The plug-in can be installed directly from within the plugin by
  clicking on the Don't see your server listed? ...
  ... from within the plugin is confusing. Was it meant to be from
  within the WTP ?
 

 Done

  4) In Installation Alternatives section:
  Download the plugin from http://apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/2.0.0/
  and unzip it into the same directory ...
  In http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg50304.html
  Matt had expressed concerns about direct mentioning of
  http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ site address. I think we need to
  come up with something like the download link in
  http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v201-release.html 
 

 Not completely yet--will work with Hernan on this

  5) In News section:
  Presentation titled J2EE Application Development on Apache Geronimo
  Simplified using Eclipse. Click here^
  
 http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html
 
  to view: 
  The link is currently pointing to a non-existent doc in
  geronimo.apache.org http://geronimo.apache.org space. Referred doc is
  in cwiki.apache.org http://cwiki.apache.org space. So the correct link
  would be
  
 http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html
  
 http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html
 
 

 Done

 
  6) In News section:
  Links for Java Developers Day 2007 in Krakow and EclipseWorld 2007
  aren't yet pointing to their specific docs, but rather just point to
  http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/. I guess these will be updated once
  their corresponding wiki pages are created.

 Yes, I'm hoping that Jacek will allow us to use his presentation from Java
 Developers Day 2007, and I'm going to provide links to my EclipseWorld
 2007
 presentations when they are completed.

 
  7) In JBoss to Geronimo Migration Tool (J2G) section:
  ... migrating the sources of an application written for the JBoss
  application server or written for Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) to
  the Apache Geronimo platform.
  Haven't yet explored J2G plug-in much. So curious to know what we mean
  by or written for Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE)? Does J2G toolkit
  also help! in creating Geronimo specific deployment plans for generic
  J2EE modules?

 I'm not sure--I got this verbiage from Jason, Viet, Eric. They are
 probably
 better qualified to answer.

 
  8) I guess 

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use

2007-09-27 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530679
 ] 

Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3481:
---

Thanks David.  I have verified that (2) is NOT necessary with (1).

 Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-3481
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.x, 2.1
 Environment: G 2.0.1 - Running multiple instances
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: David Jencks
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1

 Attachments: GERONIMO-3481-1.patch, GERONIMO-3481-2.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-2a.patch, GERONIMO-3481-3.patch, GERONIMO-3481-for-2.0.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch


 Offline deployer throws Bind Exception when port 1099 is in use.  Here is a 
 scenario steps in which the problem is experienced.
 1.  Extract G-2.0.1-Tomcat distro to C:\
 2.  Create a dir myserver under C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1 and copy 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\var to 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var (all sub-directories).
 3.  Edit 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var\config-substitutions.properties to 
 set PortOffset=10.
 4.  Open a command window and start Geronimo.  Since 
 org.apache.geronimo.server.name is not set, this will start the default 
 server instance.
 5.  Open a second command window, set 
 GERONIMO_OPTS=-Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.name=myserver.  This will be 
 command window to run the second server instance with name myserver
 6.  Run deploy.bat --offline list-modules.
 At step 6, I am getting a BIND Exception since port 1099 is in use (by the 
 default server instance) and the offline deployer is attempting to start rmi 
 naming on port 1099.  Since, this deploy command is run against second server 
 instance, I would expect that it uses the configuration properties of 
 myserver in which case it should use port 1109 to start rmi-naming if at 
 all there is a need.  When port 1099 is not in use, the offline deployer 
 works as expected by updating proper config.xml file when a configuration is 
 deployed/undeployed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-887) The default value for the result property should be set back to 'dom'

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-887.


Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Sendingdeployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/pom.xml
Sending
deployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/saxon/SaxonEndpoint.java
Sending
deployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/saxon/XsltEndpoint.java
Sendingpom.xml
Transmitting file data 
Committed revision 579968.

 The default value for the result property should be set back to 'dom'
 -

 Key: SM-887
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-887
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-saxon
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2


 This was changed because of a bug in saxon 8.8

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-886) Upgrade to saxon 9.9

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-886.


Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

Sendingdeployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/pom.xml
Sending
deployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/saxon/SaxonEndpoint.java
Sending
deployables/serviceengines/servicemix-saxon/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/saxon/XsltEndpoint.java
Sendingpom.xml
Transmitting file data 
Committed revision 579968.

 Upgrade to saxon 9.9
 

 Key: SM-886
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-886
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-saxon
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2




-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-810) Create single complete ServiceMix Shared Library

2007-09-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-810:
---

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)

 Create single complete ServiceMix Shared Library
 

 Key: SM-810
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-810
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.0
 Environment: ServiceMix 3.0
Reporter: James Lorenzen
   Original Estimate: 1 day
  Remaining Estimate: 1 day

 The current ServiceMix Shared Library is insufficient to support proper 
 portability of existing ServiceMix components to other JBI containers, such 
 as OpenESB. For example, when installing the ServiceMix HTTP BC in OpenESB, 
 NoClassDefFoundErrors occur because the installed ServiceMix Shared Library 
 does not contain all the necessary dependencies.
 Therefore it would be a good idea to create a single complete Shared Library.
 To accomplish this here are some ideas:
 1) Combine the shared library and shared library compat projects together.
 2) Ensure the new single complete Shared Library contains the following 
 dependencies:
  a) activemq-core
  b) backport-util-concurrent
  c) commons-logging
  d) servicemix-core
  e) servicemix-services
  f) spring-2.0-rc3
  g) wsdl4j
  h) xbean-classloader
  i) xbean-kernel
  j) xbean-server
  k) xbean-spring
 When complete the dependencies under /servicemix_home/lib should be smaller.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: Geronimo box on Download page still says 1.1

2007-09-27 Thread Hernan Cunico

g, reading those tutorials make it look so simple, why I didn't think about 
using those features in PS before. :-P

Good catch Shiva, thanks for the pointer. I'll work on some .psd and commit 
them soon.

Cheers!
Hernan

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:

Yes Hernan, let's create our own boxes.

Found these useful tutorials upon Google search for software box:
http://tutorialblog.org/create-a-software-box/ 
http://tutorialblog.org/create-a-software-box/

http://www.designtutorials.info/software-box-design/

Adobe Photoshop is used in both the tutorials.

- Shiva

On 9/26/07, *Hernan Cunico* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Shiva,
The .psd you see there are the templates we used as guidelines long
time ago then we overhauled the whole site.

We don't have the source files for the boxed images and I have no
idea what software was used to create them. We rely on asking other
projects to help us with this update. I asked several times what was
the software used but never get a reply.

I don't check all the commits and I was certainly unaware that those
files got finally committed. If we can't get the source nor the
details on how these boxed images got created then we should
consider creating a new set of images. What you guys think?

Cheers!
Hernan

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
  I also see some .psd files! in the same location. Must be the
source for
  those boxes. Hernan can you try opening them with your Adobe
Photoshop?
 
  - Shiva
 
  On 9/26/07, * Vamsavardhana Reddy* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hernan,
 
  I see some 2.0 box images at
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art
and they
  have been there since end of March!!  Can you update the
downloads
  page to show a 2.0 box?
 
  Vamsi
 
  On 8/22/07, *Hernan Cunico*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I've been trying for ages to get these updated. I asked folks
  from other projects using similar boxes but couldn't
figure out
  what software they were using.
 
  All I have is the Photoshop suit but I'm sure those were
created
  with something else.
 
  Cheers!
  Hernan
 
  Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Does anyone know how to get an updated box for
Geronimo that says
2.0.1?  Since its the first thing people see on that page
  seems like it
would make more sense for the release number to be the
most
  recent.  I'm
happy to do it but not sure what software was used.
   
 
 
 




2.0.2 Build failing

2007-09-27 Thread Joe Bohn
It looks like we're in an incompatible state at the moment between 
Geronimo-2.0 and Openejb trunk.  Some changes went in yesterday to 
openejb (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579817view=rev) that altered 
org.apache.openejb.spi.SecurityService and require comparable changes in 
Geronimo.  Does anybody know the status of the Geronimo changes?


Joe


Re: devtools/maven-plugins was not released as part of v2.0.0 eclipse-plugin

2007-09-27 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi Donald, I'll rectify this immediately, and will update our Plugin Release 
process to ensure it doesn't again. Thanks for the information.


Donald Woods wrote:
Tim, I just noticed that we didn't create a release of 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/ as 
part of the eclipse-plugin release.  Given the eclipse-plugin release 
used a 1.0-SNAPSHOT depend of maven-plugin (and J2G uses it too), we 
need to release it and use it for the 2.0.1 plugin release  Also, we 
need to make sure that all SNAPSHOT depends are removed in future plugin 
releases.


-Donald


--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell


Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Lin Sun
Sorry again for my confused message below.   I did add a newer message 
to your jira yesterday hoping you would pick the newer message up...

-

It looks like this build error is caused by the change to go to the 
maven-antrun-plugin.  somehow, we are configuring our eclipse env 
differently than we used to (in sandbox).  I just made a bit change to 
not download all the other unnecessary stuff (WTP and its 
prerequisites), and had thought the build error went away.  But it 
didn't.  I was able to build just now because I built the the sandbox 
j2g first which enabled the repo in a way that is favorable to build the 
org.apache.geronimo.j2g.sources plugin.


Lin

Erik B. Craig wrote:
Errmm, I got past this point, was silly firewall issues preventing it 
from hitting the mirror, however I believe I'm still having the same 
compilation issues as previously... I'll update when I can verify that...




On 9/26/07, *Erik B. Craig* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm having some issues on my ubuntu machine with this... what
platform did you get this working on?

  [get] last modified = Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 - using
current time instead
 [echo] Unzipping eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to the
expected location in /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/eclipse
   [gunzip] Expanding
/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to

/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar
[INFO]

[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]


[INFO] Error executing ant tasks

Embedded error: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/ebcraig/g-src/j2g/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml:60: Problem
expanding gzip Not in GZIP format




On 9/26/07, *Donald Woods* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would cause
you build
problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP
server adapter
builds...


-Donald

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Author: linsun
  Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
  New Revision: 579758

  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
  Log:
  These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my machine
(with a clean .m2 repo).

  Modified:
 geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml

geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-

geronimo-plan.xml

  Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
  URL:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff


==

  --- geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml (original)
  +++ geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml Wed
Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
  @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@

  target name=init
  property name=eclipse_version   value=3.3/
  -echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
v${eclipse_version}, WTP, EMF, GEF and DTP/echo
  +echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
v${eclipse_version}/echo
  property name=base_url   value=
http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/
  property name=eclipse_sdk_url  
value=${base_url}/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706251500//
  property name=eclipse_sdk_win32  
value=eclipse-SDK-${eclipse_version}- win32.zip/

  @@ -32,15 +32,6 @@
  property
name=eclipse_sdk_linux_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_linux}.gz/
  property
name=eclipse_sdk_macos_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_macos}.gz/

  -property name=dtp_download_url  
value=${base_url}/datatools/downloads/1.5//
  -property name=emf_download_url  
value=${base_url}/modeling/emf/emf/downloads/drops/2.3.0/R200706262000//


  -property name=gef_download_url  
value=${base_url}/tools/gef/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706281000//
  -property name=wtp_download_url  

Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Lin Sun
Right - i made a comment to the j2g compile prob jira yesterday PM.  I 
was able to build because I built the old j2g from sandbox first.But 
we don't need the WTP and its prereqs stuff and it can take a very long 
time to download them if you are at home or something.


Lin

Donald Woods wrote:
Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would cause you 
build problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP server 
adapter builds...



-Donald

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: linsun
Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
New Revision: 579758

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
Log:
These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my machine (with a 
clean .m2 repo).


Modified:
geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml

geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml 



Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff 

== 


--- geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml (original)
+++ geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml Wed Sep 26 
12:04:16 2007

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
 target name=init

 property name=eclipse_version   value=3.3/
-echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK 
v${eclipse_version}, WTP, EMF, GEF and DTP/echo
+echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK 
v${eclipse_version}/echo
 property name=base_url   
value=http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/
 property name=eclipse_sdk_url   
value=${base_url}/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706251500//
 property name=eclipse_sdk_win32   
value=eclipse-SDK-${eclipse_version}-win32.zip/

@@ -32,15 +32,6 @@
 property name=eclipse_sdk_linux_gz
value=${eclipse_sdk_linux}.gz/
 property name=eclipse_sdk_macos_gz
value=${eclipse_sdk_macos}.gz/
 
-property name=dtp_download_url   
value=${base_url}/datatools/downloads/1.5//
-property name=emf_download_url   
value=${base_url}/modeling/emf/emf/downloads/drops/2.3.0/R200706262000// 

-property name=gef_download_url   
value=${base_url}/tools/gef/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706281000//
-property name=wtp_download_url   
value=${base_url}/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303//

-
-property name=dtp_sdk value=dtp-sdk_1.5_20070704.zip/
-property name=emf_sdo value=emf-sdo-xsd-SDK-2.3.0.zip/
-property name=gef_sdk value=GEF-SDK-3.3.zip/
-property name=wtp_sdk 
value=wtp-sdk-R-2.0-200706260303.zip/

 property name=protocol value=amp;r=1amp;protocol=http/
 /target
 
@@ -89,62 +80,5 @@
 echoRemoving any existing version of Eclipse at 
${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/echo

 delete dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/
 echoDownloading WTP prereqs/echo
-antcall target=dtp/
-antcall target=emf/ -antcall target=gef/ 
-antcall target=wtp/ -/target

-
-target name=dtp depends=init description=Download Data 
Tools Platform (DTP) artifact

-echoDownloading ${dtp_download_url}${dtp_sdk}/echo
-mkdir 
dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/

-get src=${dtp_download_url}${dtp_sdk}${protocol}
- 
dest=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/${dtp_sdk} 
- verbose=true

- usetimestamp=true/
-echoUnzipping ${dtp_sdk} to the expected location in 
${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/echo

-mkdir dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/
-unzip 
src=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/${dtp_sdk} 
-   dest=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/

-/target
-
-target name=emf depends=init description=Download Eclipse 
Modeling Framework (EMF) artifact

-echoDownloading ${emf_download_url}${emf_sdo}/echo
-mkdir 
dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/

-get src=${emf_download_url}${emf_sdo}${protocol}
- 
dest=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/${emf_sdo} 
- verbose=true

- usetimestamp=true/
-echoUnzipping ${emf_sdo} to the expected location in 
${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/echo

-mkdir dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/
-unzip 
src=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/${emf_sdo} 
-   dest=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/eclipse/

 /target
-
-target name=gef depends=init description=Download Graphical 
Editing Framework (GEF) artifact

-echoDownloading ${gef_download_url}${gef_sdk}/echo
-mkdir 
dir=${LOCAL_M2_REPO}/org/eclipse/eclipse/${eclipse_version}/

-get src=${gef_download_url}${gef_sdk}${protocol}
- 

Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Erik B. Craig
Yeah, I actually just attempted the same thing. I'm trying to figure out
where it could be getting the hardcoded jar from though.

On 9/27/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tried to change it to

 M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-
 3.3.0-v_771.jar
 didn't work either.  Right it seems somewhere it has hardcoded value to
 the old level of jars...

 Lin

 Donald Woods wrote:
  Could it be the level of the org.eclipse.jdt.core jarfile listed in
  plugins\org.apache.geronimo.j2g.sources\.classpath ?
 
  Seems the Eclipse 3.3 runtime provides 3.3.0-v_771 but the .classpath is
  still using the older 3.1.1 level
 
  -Donald
 
  Erik B. Craig wrote:
  Errmm, I got past this point, was silly firewall issues preventing it
  from hitting the mirror, however I believe I'm still having the same
  compilation issues as previously... I'll update when I can verify
 that...
 
 
 
  On 9/26/07, *Erik B. Craig* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm having some issues on my ubuntu machine with this... what
  platform did you get this working on?
 
[get] last modified = Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 - using
  current time instead
   [echo] Unzipping eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to the
  expected location in /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository
  [mkdir] Created dir: /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/eclipse
 [gunzip] Expanding
  /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
  SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to
 
  /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
 SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar
 
  [INFO]
 
 
 
  [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
  [INFO]
 
 
 
 
  [INFO] Error executing ant tasks
 
  Embedded error: The following error occurred while executing this
  line:
  /home/ebcraig/g-src/j2g/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml:60: Problem
  expanding gzip Not in GZIP format
 
 
 
 
  On 9/26/07, *Donald Woods* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would cause
  you build
  problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP
  server adapter
  builds...
 
 
  -Donald
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: linsun
Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
New Revision: 579758
  
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
Log:
These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my machine
  (with a clean .m2 repo).
  
Modified:
   geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
  
 
 geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-
 
  geronimo-plan.xml
  
Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-
 3.3.xml
URL:
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff
 
 
  
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff
 
 
  
 
 
 ==
 
 
--- geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
  (original)
+++ geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml Wed
  Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
  
target name=init
property name=eclipse_version   value=3.3/
-echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
  v${eclipse_version}, WTP, EMF, GEF and DTP/echo
+echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
  v${eclipse_version}/echo
property name=base_url   value=
  http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/
property name=eclipse_sdk_url
  value=${base_url}/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706251500//
property name=eclipse_sdk_win32
  value=eclipse-SDK-${eclipse_version}- win32.zip/
@@ -32,15 +32,6 @@
property
 
 name=eclipse_sdk_linux_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_linux}.gz/
property
 
 name=eclipse_sdk_macos_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_macos}.gz/
  
-property name=dtp_download_url
  value=${base_url}/datatools/downloads/1.5//
-property name=emf_download_url
 
 value=${base_url}/modeling/emf/emf/downloads/drops/2.3.0/R200706262000//
 
 
-property name=gef_download_url
  

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3489) Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures

2007-09-27 Thread Ted Kirby (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530765
 ] 

Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-3489:
-

I note also that starting the server with these two system properties 
significantly reduced the occurrence of the problem:

Xorg.apache.geronimo.JarFileClassLoader=true

Xorg.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.MPCLSearchOption=safe

The bad news is that server startup time was increased.  :-(


 Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3489
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1
Reporter: Ted Kirby
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1


 File.delete() failures in IOUtil.recursiveDelete() are causing various 
 deployment problems.  I open this JIRA to discuss them to see how the server 
 might better handle them.  In all but one case, delete failures are not even 
 noted with a log record!  Deletion problems are seen in many environments and 
 platforms, but they are persistently fatal when using a NFS file system for 
 the repository.
 In investigating the problem, I have added code to recursiveDelete to retry 
 the delete a few times if it fails.  I added code to list directory contents 
 if a directory delete failed, and saw a file named 
 .nfs2bc4350053e in the directory.  My first attempt at a bypass 
 was to retry a failed delete 5 times, sleeping a second before each try.  
 This did not work.  I added a call to System.gc() before each sleep, and this 
 got me passed the problem.  Interestingly, two retries were required to get 
 this to work.  In another version, each retry was a second longer, and I 
 printed all file names in a directory before trying the delete.  This worked 
 in most cases, but required the full 5 retries, so I suspect System.gc() 
 would have time.  System.runFinalization() would be something else to try.
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) shows the 
 failing end of the deletion problem, with the dreaded 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException(Configuration already exists:  + 
 configId)exception.  I think this message is not good.  It should really say 
 directory already exists.  If the file is not deleted on undeploy, this 
 failure occurs on a subsequent deploy.  What is really bad is if the user 
 invokes a redeploy operation, and the file delete fails on the undeploy.  It 
 is important that undeploy not complete until the file goes away.
 From other environments, I am not convinced that all file handles and 
 references, and particularly open streams, are being closed on some 
 artifacts.  This will cause the delete to fail.  It may be that the gc() 
 calls are cleaning these up, and allowing the deletes to work in my case 
 above.
 Another option is that 
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) not throw a 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException if the only problem is an empty directory 
 structure exists.  The next line creates the directory structure anyway.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use

2007-09-27 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3481.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
 Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy  (was: David Jencks)

Completed: At revision: 580077  
 o Change the scope of jaxws-deployer's dependency on webservices-common to 
runtime.
 o Prevent offline deployer from stopping the onlineConfigStores as it will 
leave no stores for the offline deployer to work with.

 Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-3481
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.x, 2.1
 Environment: G 2.0.1 - Running multiple instances
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.1

 Attachments: GERONIMO-3481-1.patch, GERONIMO-3481-2.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-2a.patch, GERONIMO-3481-3.patch, GERONIMO-3481-for-2.0.patch, 
 GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch


 Offline deployer throws Bind Exception when port 1099 is in use.  Here is a 
 scenario steps in which the problem is experienced.
 1.  Extract G-2.0.1-Tomcat distro to C:\
 2.  Create a dir myserver under C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1 and copy 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\var to 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var (all sub-directories).
 3.  Edit 
 C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var\config-substitutions.properties to 
 set PortOffset=10.
 4.  Open a command window and start Geronimo.  Since 
 org.apache.geronimo.server.name is not set, this will start the default 
 server instance.
 5.  Open a second command window, set 
 GERONIMO_OPTS=-Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.name=myserver.  This will be 
 command window to run the second server instance with name myserver
 6.  Run deploy.bat --offline list-modules.
 At step 6, I am getting a BIND Exception since port 1099 is in use (by the 
 default server instance) and the offline deployer is attempting to start rmi 
 naming on port 1099.  Since, this deploy command is run against second server 
 instance, I would expect that it uses the configuration properties of 
 myserver in which case it should use port 1109 to start rmi-naming if at 
 all there is a need.  When port 1099 is not in use, the offline deployer 
 works as expected by updating proper config.xml file when a configuration is 
 deployed/undeployed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Lin Sun
Tried to change it to 
M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-3.3.0-v_771.jar 
didn't work either.  Right it seems somewhere it has hardcoded value to 
the old level of jars...


Lin

Donald Woods wrote:
Could it be the level of the org.eclipse.jdt.core jarfile listed in 
plugins\org.apache.geronimo.j2g.sources\.classpath ?


Seems the Eclipse 3.3 runtime provides 3.3.0-v_771 but the .classpath is 
still using the older 3.1.1 level


-Donald

Erik B. Craig wrote:
Errmm, I got past this point, was silly firewall issues preventing it 
from hitting the mirror, however I believe I'm still having the same 
compilation issues as previously... I'll update when I can verify that...




On 9/26/07, *Erik B. Craig* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm having some issues on my ubuntu machine with this... what
platform did you get this working on?

  [get] last modified = Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 - using
current time instead
 [echo] Unzipping eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to the
expected location in /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/eclipse
   [gunzip] Expanding
/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to

/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar 


[INFO]



[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]




[INFO] Error executing ant tasks

Embedded error: The following error occurred while executing this 
line:

/home/ebcraig/g-src/j2g/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml:60: Problem
expanding gzip Not in GZIP format




On 9/26/07, *Donald Woods* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would cause
you build
problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP
server adapter
builds...


-Donald

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Author: linsun
  Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
  New Revision: 579758

  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
  Log:
  These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my machine
(with a clean .m2 repo).

  Modified:
 geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml

geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security- 


geronimo-plan.xml

  Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
  URL:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff 


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff 




== 



  --- geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml 
(original)

  +++ geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml Wed
Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
  @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@

  target name=init
  property name=eclipse_version   value=3.3/
  -echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
v${eclipse_version}, WTP, EMF, GEF and DTP/echo
  +echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK
v${eclipse_version}/echo
  property name=base_url   value=
http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/
  property name=eclipse_sdk_url  
value=${base_url}/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706251500//
  property name=eclipse_sdk_win32  
value=eclipse-SDK-${eclipse_version}- win32.zip/

  @@ -32,15 +32,6 @@
  property
name=eclipse_sdk_linux_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_linux}.gz/
  property
name=eclipse_sdk_macos_gzvalue=${eclipse_sdk_macos}.gz/

  -property name=dtp_download_url  
value=${base_url}/datatools/downloads/1.5//
  -property name=emf_download_url  
value=${base_url}/modeling/emf/emf/downloads/drops/2.3.0/R200706262000// 



  -property name=gef_download_url  
value=${base_url}/tools/gef/downloads/drops/R-3.3-200706281000//
  -property name=wtp_download_url  
value=${base_url}/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-

2.0-200706260303//
  -
  -property name=dtp_sdk
value=dtp-sdk_1.5_20070704.zip/
  -   

Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Erik B. Craig
I did some search/replace on the source files that it's actually having
issues on...
It seems as though it's not having any problem at all locating the
org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit class... it's only the two methods
(getLineNumber and getColumnNumber) that it doesn't recognize at all.
Looking in the API doc for jdtcore (
http://help.eclipse.org/help33/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/jdt/core/dom/class-use/CompilationUnit.html)
the methods are still the same, and have not been deprecated. I'm not quite
sure what to make of this, especially since other methods from the same
exact class are being picked up and compiling fine.
This was while having the .classpath changed to use
M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-
3.3.0-v_771.jar.

... Slightly dumbfounded now, got any ideas?


On 9/27/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, I actually just attempted the same thing. I'm trying to figure out
 where it could be getting the hardcoded jar from though.

 On 9/27/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Tried to change it to
 
  M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-
  3.3.0-v_771.jar
  didn't work either.  Right it seems somewhere it has hardcoded value to
  the old level of jars...
 
  Lin
 
  Donald Woods wrote:
   Could it be the level of the org.eclipse.jdt.core jarfile listed in
   plugins\org.apache.geronimo.j2g.sources\.classpath ?
  
   Seems the Eclipse 3.3 runtime provides 3.3.0-v_771 but the .classpath
  is
   still using the older 3.1.1 level
  
   -Donald
  
   Erik B. Craig wrote:
   Errmm, I got past this point, was silly firewall issues preventing it
   from hitting the mirror, however I believe I'm still having the same
   compilation issues as previously... I'll update when I can verify
  that...
  
  
  
   On 9/26/07, *Erik B. Craig* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I'm having some issues on my ubuntu machine with this... what
   platform did you get this working on?
  
 [get] last modified = Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 - using
   current time instead
[echo] Unzipping eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to the
   expected location in /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository
   [mkdir] Created dir: /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/eclipse
  [gunzip] Expanding
   /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
   SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to
  
   /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
  SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar
  
   [INFO]
  
  
  
   [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
   [INFO]
  
  
  
  
   [INFO] Error executing ant tasks
  
   Embedded error: The following error occurred while executing this
   line:
   /home/ebcraig/g-src/j2g/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml:60: Problem
   expanding gzip Not in GZIP format
  
  
  
  
   On 9/26/07, *Donald Woods* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   wrote:
  
   Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would
  cause
   you build
   problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP
   server adapter
   builds...
  
  
   -Donald
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Author: linsun
 Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
 New Revision: 579758
   
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev 
 Log:
 These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my
  machine
   (with a clean .m2 repo).
   
 Modified:
geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
   
  
  geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-
  
   geronimo-plan.xml
   
 Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-
  3.3.xml
 URL:
  
  
  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff
  
  
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff
  
  
   
  
  
  ==
 
  
  
 --- geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml
   (original)
 +++ geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xmlWed
   Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
   
 target name=init
 property name=eclipse_version   value= 3.3
  /
 -echoSetting up for downloading Eclipse SDK

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3441) Server monitoring and management

2007-09-27 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3441:
---

Attachment: (was: stats.patch)

 Server monitoring and management
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3441
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: general
Affects Versions: 2.1
 Environment: All
Reporter: Erik B. Craig
Assignee: Erik B. Craig
 Attachments: mrc-client.zip, mrc-server.zip, screenshot1.jpg, 
 screenshot2.jpg


 Currently, there is not a good way of surfacing Geronimo's server information 
 so that an administrator can monitor the server's status. The architecture of 
 using MBeans is established, but not fully exploited. This enhancement will 
 take advantage of what Geronimo currently offers and extend it so that a 
 server can tap into a cluster of servers and extract information from 
 specific Geronimo servers or even aggregates of Geronimo servers.
 The goal is to have one machine be able to reach out to all Geronimo servers 
 in order to fetch data or even alter their state. This will be especially 
 useful in the case of someone having to monitor a large number of Geronimo 
 servers.
 Viet Nguyen and myself have completed a bit of framework towards this goal, 
 to be attached to this jira
 In-depth information can be found in the confluence wiki here
 http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Monitoring+and+Management+Service

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3441) Server monitoring and management

2007-09-27 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3441:
---

Attachment: stats.patch

I have added the lastSampleTime and startTime field for each statistic. Also, 
the statisticsProvider attribute was already set to true, so it is not present 
in the patch, but it is there when I view the mbean from jconsole.

This patch also exposes the Jetty Connector stats in addition to the Jetty 
Container stats. I have tested this patch on the latest trunk and both tomcat 
and jetty works fine.

If someone could review the patch along with the MRC plugins, it will be great 
to get this into sandbox.

 Server monitoring and management
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3441
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: general
Affects Versions: 2.1
 Environment: All
Reporter: Erik B. Craig
Assignee: Erik B. Craig
 Attachments: mrc-client.zip, mrc-server.zip, screenshot1.jpg, 
 screenshot2.jpg, stats.patch


 Currently, there is not a good way of surfacing Geronimo's server information 
 so that an administrator can monitor the server's status. The architecture of 
 using MBeans is established, but not fully exploited. This enhancement will 
 take advantage of what Geronimo currently offers and extend it so that a 
 server can tap into a cluster of servers and extract information from 
 specific Geronimo servers or even aggregates of Geronimo servers.
 The goal is to have one machine be able to reach out to all Geronimo servers 
 in order to fetch data or even alter their state. This will be especially 
 useful in the case of someone having to monitor a large number of Geronimo 
 servers.
 Viet Nguyen and myself have completed a bit of framework towards this goal, 
 to be attached to this jira
 In-depth information can be found in the confluence wiki here
 http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Monitoring+and+Management+Service

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: svn commit: r579758 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-geronimo-plan.xml

2007-09-27 Thread Erik B. Craig
Futerhmore,

I've dove into the eclipse SDK repository and taken a gander at the source
do org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit v771
(here:
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.jdt.core/dom/org/eclipse/jdt/core/dom/CompilationUnit.java?view=markuppathrev=v_771
)
and found that the methods do in fact exist in this revision.

On 9/27/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I did some search/replace on the source files that it's actually having
 issues on...
 It seems as though it's not having any problem at all locating the
 org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit class... it's only the two
 methods (getLineNumber and getColumnNumber) that it doesn't recognize at
 all. Looking in the API doc for jdtcore ( 
 http://help.eclipse.org/help33/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/jdt/core/dom/class-use/CompilationUnit.html
 ) the methods are still the same, and have not been deprecated. I'm not
 quite sure what to make of this, especially since other methods from the
 same exact class are being picked up and compiling fine.
 This was while having the .classpath changed to use
 M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-
 3.3.0-v_771.jar.

 ... Slightly dumbfounded now, got any ideas?


 On 9/27/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yeah, I actually just attempted the same thing. I'm trying to figure out
  where it could be getting the hardcoded jar from though.
 
  On 9/27/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Tried to change it to
  
   M2_REPO/org/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core/3.3.0-v_771/org.eclipse.jdt.core-
   3.3.0-v_771.jar
   didn't work either.  Right it seems somewhere it has hardcoded value
   to
   the old level of jars...
  
   Lin
  
   Donald Woods wrote:
Could it be the level of the org.eclipse.jdt.core jarfile listed in
plugins\org.apache.geronimo.j2g.sources\.classpath ?
   
Seems the Eclipse 3.3 runtime provides 3.3.0-v_771 but the
   .classpath is
still using the older 3.1.1 level
   
-Donald
   
Erik B. Craig wrote:
Errmm, I got past this point, was silly firewall issues preventing
   it
from hitting the mirror, however I believe I'm still having the
   same
compilation issues as previously... I'll update when I can verify
   that...
   
   
   
On 9/26/07, *Erik B. Craig*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
I'm having some issues on my ubuntu machine with this... what
platform did you get this working on?
   
  [get] last modified = Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 -
   using
current time instead
 [echo] Unzipping eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to the
expected location in /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/eclipse
   [gunzip] Expanding
/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz to
   
/home/ebcraig/.m2/repository/org/eclipse/eclipse/3.3/eclipse-
   SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar
   
[INFO]
   
   
   
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
   
   
   
   
[INFO] Error executing ant tasks
   
Embedded error: The following error occurred while executing
   this
line:
/home/ebcraig/g-src/j2g/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml:60: Problem
expanding gzip Not in GZIP format
   
   
   
   
On 9/26/07, *Donald Woods* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   wrote:
   
Not sure why having WTP and its prereqs in the repo would
   cause
you build
problems, as this is exactly the same as we do for the WTP
server adapter
builds...
   
   
-Donald
   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Author: linsun
  Date: Wed Sep 26 12:04:16 2007
  New Revision: 579758

  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579758view=rev 
  Log:
  These changes seem to fix GERONIMODEVTOOLS-224 on my
   machine
(with a clean .m2 repo).

  Modified:
 geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml

   
   geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/security-
   
geronimo-plan.xml

  Modified: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-
   3.3.xml
  URL:
   
   
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/eclipse/eclipse-3.3.xml?rev=579758r1=579757r2=579758view=diff
   
   

Re: 2.0.2 Build failing

2007-09-27 Thread Joe Bohn



Joe Bohn wrote:
It looks like we're in an incompatible state at the moment between 
Geronimo-2.0 and Openejb trunk.  Some changes went in yesterday to 
openejb (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579817view=rev) that altered 
org.apache.openejb.spi.SecurityService and require comparable changes in 
Geronimo.  Does anybody know the status of the Geronimo changes?



I'm going to switch the Geronimo-2.0 dependency on openejb from 
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT (trunk) to 3.0-beta-1.  This should hopefully get around 
this build problem since the SecurityService change didn't go into 
3.0-beta-1 and get geronimo 2.0.2 on a stable openejb release as we get 
closed to getting it out the door.


Joe


[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3441) Server monitoring and management

2007-09-27 Thread Erik B. Craig (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3441:


Attachment: mrc.zip

I have created a combined package with a pom to handle building both the client 
and the server, everything has proper License information, as well as notice 
information (both the files and in the headers of all source files). The 
directory structure is completely setup for import into svn as 
geronimo/sandbox/svn (has the branches/tags/trunk directories created, with 
content in the trunk only currently)

 Server monitoring and management
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3441
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: general
Affects Versions: 2.1
 Environment: All
Reporter: Erik B. Craig
Assignee: Erik B. Craig
 Attachments: mrc-client.zip, mrc-server.zip, mrc.zip, 
 screenshot1.jpg, screenshot2.jpg, stats.patch


 Currently, there is not a good way of surfacing Geronimo's server information 
 so that an administrator can monitor the server's status. The architecture of 
 using MBeans is established, but not fully exploited. This enhancement will 
 take advantage of what Geronimo currently offers and extend it so that a 
 server can tap into a cluster of servers and extract information from 
 specific Geronimo servers or even aggregates of Geronimo servers.
 The goal is to have one machine be able to reach out to all Geronimo servers 
 in order to fetch data or even alter their state. This will be especially 
 useful in the case of someone having to monitor a large number of Geronimo 
 servers.
 Viet Nguyen and myself have completed a bit of framework towards this goal, 
 to be attached to this jira
 In-depth information can be found in the confluence wiki here
 http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Monitoring+and+Management+Service

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [UPDATE] Server monitoring and Management plugin

2007-09-27 Thread Erik B. Craig
I have attached a new combined mrc.zip file that contains both the
mrc-server and the mrc-client sharing a pom to compile both, as well as 100%
correct license.txt files, notice.txt files, and ASL license headers in all
files. It also has the correct directory structure to be directly imported
into geronimo/sandbox (has branches/tags/trunk, everything is in the trunk
the the archive).

Here's the link to the jira again:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441

If someone would be so kind as to maybe import this into sandbox for some
easier development for viet and I, that would be fantastic =)

On 9/26/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Looks great and keep up the much needed monitoring support work!

 If you attach a zipfile of the source to the JIRA with the ASL
 contribution
 bit checked (and with the required ASL headers and license files in the
 source) I'd be glad to check it into sandbox or plugins/trunk

 -Donald

 Erik B. Craig wrote:
  Greetings,
 
  After a round of improvements to the monitoring and management plugin
  that Viet an I have been working on
  (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441), we felt it was
  time to update everyone on where things are at, and hopefully get a good
  deal of feedback and perhaps a feel for the direction everyone thinks
  would be best for this.
 
  Since the last time we brought it to the dev list, the method in which
  data is collected has been changed to utilize the JSR77 defined
  statistics. Currently we have implemented this for the Tomcat connectors
  'TomcatWebConnector', 'TomcatWebSSLConnector', and 'TomcatAJPConnector'.
  This information is still having 'snapshots' taken, and is then stored
  locally at a set interval (now defined in a configuration file) in an
  XML file. There are still some issues revolving around surfacing the
  equivalent statistics for Jetty (We have tomcat CONNECTORS, but jetty
  CONTAINERS), largely due to geronimo losing a handle on them since
  jetty6, but it is being worked on. In addition to Jetty, we're also
  looking at getting MEJB stats surfaced and tracked very soon down the
  road... and if anyone has any other suggestions for what you think
  should be able to be collected, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
  In addition to using JSR77 on the mrc-server component, there are a
  number of other improvements, including
  * Archiving of snapshot data in a zip file every month - prevent the
  single active file from getting too large
  * Ability to start/stop the statistics collection thread
  * Specify the duration between snapshots
  * Ability to modify mbean attributes
  * Ability to add mbeans to track in the snapshot process
 
  As far as the client side of things goes...
 
  The plugin has been updated to be deployable on the latest iteration of
  the plugable console Paul has been working on, and is working fully on
  the latest 2.1 trunk with the plugable console deployed. It is also now
  doing page generation through JSPs from the portlet, where as previously
  it was simple line prints to the http response. The graphing is now far
  more dynamic, and able to accept any time frame (in minutes) from
  2*snapshotduration up to however high you can count (or fit into an
  integer, whichever comes first). If there is not enough snapshot data to
  generate the requested graph, 'older' data will be inserted with values
  of 0. If there are gaps in the snapshots ( I.E. the snapshot time of
  element 1 vs. element 2 is greater than the snapshot duration), the
  client will fill in dummy data between the two, so that the time frame
  and stamps on the generated graph is accurate. (To be further improved
  to indicate gaps via highlighting on the graphs).
 
  In addition to this, determining exactly 'what' is being graphed is now
  dynamically done depending on what is being collected on the server
  side. This will further be improved through a configuration page and
  file on the client side, that will allow enabling or disabling of graphs
  for statistics being collected on the server side , as well as
  configuring exactly how they are displayed (color, axis labels, size,
 etc).
 
  For some more information on the current status, check out the jira link
  above, or the wiki page here
 
 http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Monitoring+and+Management+Service
  
 http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Monitoring+and+Management+Service
 
 
  Again - all feedback, questions, suggestions would be greatly
 appreciated
 
  On a side note - would it be possible to get an iteration of this stuff
  checked into either sandbox of the plugins directory? It would certainly
  make things much easier for collaboration and revision control =)
 
  Thanks,
 
  --
  Erik B. Craig




-- 
Erik B. Craig


Re: refactoring jaxws support

2007-09-27 Thread Jarek Gawor
FYI, CXF refactoring is now done in trunk. Everything seems to be
working and I can now install the cxf-deployer/car plugin onto the
minimal assembly and successfully deploy and run JAX-WS
(Serlvet-based) web services.

I'll work on Axis2 next.

Jarek

On 9/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm planning to
 split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose
 of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Servlet bits so that we
 can create a minimal server with JAX-WS support but without installing
 OpenEJB first.

 Separating the EJB bits from Servlet bits will require moving some
 code into new modules and creating a few new configs. It will probably
 require creating 2 new modules, and 2 new configs per each engine
 implementation and 2 new modules, 2 new configs for shared code and
 configuration. So at the end it might be quite a few new modules and
 configs (unless I find or somebody suggests a better way to split this
 up).

 This is just a plan right now and things might change as I work through it.

 Jarek



Re: refactoring jaxws support

2007-09-27 Thread David Jencks

Excellent!!!

thanks
david jencks

On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:


FYI, CXF refactoring is now done in trunk. Everything seems to be
working and I can now install the cxf-deployer/car plugin onto the
minimal assembly and successfully deploy and run JAX-WS
(Serlvet-based) web services.

I'll work on Axis2 next.

Jarek

On 9/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm  
planning to

split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose
of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Servlet bits so that we
can create a minimal server with JAX-WS support but without  
installing

OpenEJB first.

Separating the EJB bits from Servlet bits will require moving some
code into new modules and creating a few new configs. It will  
probably

require creating 2 new modules, and 2 new configs per each engine
implementation and 2 new modules, 2 new configs for shared code and
configuration. So at the end it might be quite a few new modules and
configs (unless I find or somebody suggests a better way to split  
this

up).

This is just a plan right now and things might change as I work  
through it.


Jarek





[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-225) j2g-configure.sh does not support ~ in the ECLIPSE_HOME path

2007-09-27 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
j2g-configure.sh does not support ~ in the ECLIPSE_HOME path


 Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-225
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-225
 Project: Geronimo-Devtools
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: J2G
Affects Versions: 1.0.0
Reporter: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor


using ~/eclipse hen prompted for the ECLIPSE_HOME will fail, but 
/home/drwoods/eclipse works

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-27 Thread Kevan Miller


On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:



On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

OK, I'm done updating the 2.0.x closed issues (sorry for all the  
JIRA emails.)


The only one I couldn't figure out, was:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3423


Donald,
Thanks a bunch for going through all of those Jiras!

David Blevins,
Are we missing 3423 in branches/2.0?


Heh. Looks like I merged the change to branches/2.0 in revision  
570950 -- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=570950.


--kevan


[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3489) Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures

2007-09-27 Thread Ted Kirby (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-3489:


Attachment: G3489-1.patch

G4380-1.patch is a patch for IOUtil.recursiveDelete.

System.runFinalization() didn't really seem to help out much, so I went with 
System.gc().
This patch warns on delete failure after 5 retries, and will put debug info on 
each failure and retry.

 Deployment problems caused by file deletion failures
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3489
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3489
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0.1
Reporter: Ted Kirby
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1

 Attachments: G3489-1.patch


 File.delete() failures in IOUtil.recursiveDelete() are causing various 
 deployment problems.  I open this JIRA to discuss them to see how the server 
 might better handle them.  In all but one case, delete failures are not even 
 noted with a log record!  Deletion problems are seen in many environments and 
 platforms, but they are persistently fatal when using a NFS file system for 
 the repository.
 In investigating the problem, I have added code to recursiveDelete to retry 
 the delete a few times if it fails.  I added code to list directory contents 
 if a directory delete failed, and saw a file named 
 .nfs2bc4350053e in the directory.  My first attempt at a bypass 
 was to retry a failed delete 5 times, sleeping a second before each try.  
 This did not work.  I added a call to System.gc() before each sleep, and this 
 got me passed the problem.  Interestingly, two retries were required to get 
 this to work.  In another version, each retry was a second longer, and I 
 printed all file names in a directory before trying the delete.  This worked 
 in most cases, but required the full 5 retries, so I suspect System.gc() 
 would have time.  System.runFinalization() would be something else to try.
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) shows the 
 failing end of the deletion problem, with the dreaded 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException(Configuration already exists:  + 
 configId)exception.  I think this message is not good.  It should really say 
 directory already exists.  If the file is not deleted on undeploy, this 
 failure occurs on a subsequent deploy.  What is really bad is if the user 
 invokes a redeploy operation, and the file delete fails on the undeploy.  It 
 is important that undeploy not complete until the file goes away.
 From other environments, I am not convinced that all file handles and 
 references, and particularly open streams, are being closed on some 
 artifacts.  This will cause the delete to fail.  It may be that the gc() 
 calls are cleaning these up, and allowing the deletes to work in my case 
 above.
 Another option is that 
 RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact) not throw a 
 ConfigurationAlreadyExistsException if the only problem is an empty directory 
 structure exists.  The next line creates the directory structure anyway.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-27 Thread David Blevins


On Sep 26, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:



On Sep 25, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:



On Sep 25, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

One thing I've noticed -- the default JNDI name for EJB's has  
been changed in OpenEJB. So, there is a compatibility issue with  
2.0.1. We might be able to configure how OpenEJB generates this  
default to maintain backward compatibility. Better, IMO, to go  
ahead and match OpenEJB's behavior.


There are no compatibility issues as it was explicitly set in  
Geronimo 2.0.1 to be essentially {moduleId}/{ejbName}/ 
{interfaceClass}  (actually it's {deploymentId}/{interfaceClass}  
and deploymentId will be {moduleId}/{ejbName}).  It'll still be  
the same in Geronimo 2.0.2, just now it can be changed to  
something shorter.


Well, that's encouraging. However, something has changed between  
2.0.1 and 2.0.2. Can you help explain the following?


INFO log during 2.0.1 deploy:

18:45:13,785 INFO  [config] Configuring app: GeneralEJB.jar
18:45:13,849 INFO  [OpenEJB] Auto-deploying ejb My: EjbDeployment 
(deployment-id=GeneralEJB.jar/My, container-id=null)

18:45:14,066 INFO  [config] Loaded Module: GeneralEJB.jar
18:45:16,653 INFO  [Enhance] You have enabled runtime enhancement,  
but have not specified the set of persistent classes.  OpenJPA must  
look for metadata for every loaded class, which might increase  
class load times significantly.
18:45:17,021 INFO  [startup] Assembling app: /geronimo-jetty6- 
jee5-2.0.1/var/temp/geronimo-deploymentUtil24358.jar

18:45:17,375 INFO  [startup] Jndi(name=GeneralEJB.jar/My/ejbs.My)
18:45:17,375 INFO  [startup] Created Ejb(deployment- 
id=GeneralEJB.jar/My, ejb-name=My, container=Default Stateless  
Container)


INFO log during 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT deploy:

18:52:08,701 INFO  [config] Configuring app: sibc/ejb/7.0.0/ear
18:52:08,936 INFO  [OpenEJB] Auto-deploying ejb My: EjbDeployment 
(deployment-id=GeneralEJB.jar/My)

18:52:09,281 INFO  [config] Loaded Module: sibc/ejb/7.0.0/ear
18:52:11,467 INFO  [Enhance] You have enabled runtime enhancement,  
but have not specified the set of persistent classes.  OpenJPA must  
look for metadata for every loaded class, which might increase  
class load times significantly.
18:52:11,977 INFO  [startup] Assembling app: /Users/kevan/geronimo/ 
server/branches/2.0/target/geronimo-jetty6-jee5-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/var/ 
temp/geronimo-deploymentUtil14898.jar
18:52:12,440 INFO  [startup] Jndi(name=GeneralEJB.jar/My/ 
ejbs.MyHome) -- Ejb(deployment-id=GeneralEJB.jar/My)
18:52:12,447 INFO  [startup] Created Ejb(deployment- 
id=GeneralEJB.jar/My, ejb-name=My, container=Default Stateless  
Container)


Note the different JNDI names...


Looks like there's a change there (value of interfaceClass) I had  
thought went in before 2.0.1 was shipped.  The interfaceClass  
variable now refers to the interface you get when you do a lookup, so  
the EJBHome, EJBLocalHome or business interface such that if you set  
your jndiname format to simply {interfaceClass} and did something  
like this in code:


MyHome home = (MyHome) ctx.lookup(MyHome.class.getName());

It would work.  Or if you wanted to implement a java generic service- 
locator in you could set your jndiname format to something like  
{ejbName}/{interfaceClass} you could do:


public T T getComponent(String ejbName, ClassT type) {
return (T)ctx.lookup(ejbName+/+type.getName());
}

MyHome home = getComponent(FooBean, MyHome.class);

You get the idea.

Anyway, it's up to us how we want to deal with this in Geronimo.   
It's actually possible for us to replace this part of the system and  
plugin in something that does whatever we like.  We could go with the  
change now and warn users, we could grab a copy of the old formatter  
and plug it in replacing the updated formatter and use it till 2.0.x  
is done (or longer i guess), or provide some other custom option.


(fyi, all of this is doable with trunk or 3.0-beta-1)

Anyone have any preferences or thoughts?

-David




[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 580192

2007-09-27 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 580189
Geronimo Revision: 580192 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2200.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070927/build-2200.log
 
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/3.1/xbean-naming-3.1.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.1' from 
repository apache-incubating-repository 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository)
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/3.1/xbean-naming-3.1.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.1' from 
repository tomcat-private-repository 
(http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository)
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/3.1/xbean-naming-3.1.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.1' from 
repository openejb-3rdparty-builds 
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo/)
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/3.1/xbean-naming-3.1.jar
47K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.axis2/jars/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:1.3' 
from repository java.net (http://download.java.net/maven/1/)
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:1.3' 
from repository apache-incubator 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/)
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:1.3' 
from repository apache-incubating-repository 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository)
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:1.3' 
from repository tomcat-private-repository 
(http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository)
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:1.3' 
from repository openejb-3rdparty-builds 
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo/)
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
28K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//com.sun.xml.bind/jars/jaxb-impl-2.0.3.jar
765K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//javax.xml.bind/jars/jaxb-api-2.0.jar
72K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec:jar:1.0' from 
repository java.net (http://download.java.net/maven/1/)
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec:jar:1.0' from 
repository apache-incubator 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/)
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec:jar:1.0' from 
repository apache-incubating-repository 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository)
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec:jar:1.0' from 
repository tomcat-private-repository 
(http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository)
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec:jar:1.0' from 
repository openejb-3rdparty-builds 
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo/)
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
8K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 
'org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-j2ee

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 580193

2007-09-27 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 580189
Geronimo Revision: 580193 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2200.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070927/build-2200.log
 
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-server:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-server:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-ejbd:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-ejbd:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.openejb:openejb-ejbd:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from apache.snapshots
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.3-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.3-20070925.091916-1.jar
306K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.axis2/jars/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/1.3/axis2-jaxws-api-1.3.jar
28K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.codehaus.swizzle/jars/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/codehaus/swizzle/swizzle-stream/1.0.1/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/codehaus/swizzle/swizzle-stream/1.0.1/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/codehaus/swizzle/swizzle-stream/1.0.1/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/codehaus/swizzle/swizzle-stream/1.0.1/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/swizzle/swizzle-stream/1.0.1/swizzle-stream-1.0.1.jar
42K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.jar
8K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
14K downloaded
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//activemq/jars/jmdns-1.0-RC2.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//activemq/jmdns/1.0-RC2/jmdns-1.0-RC2.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/activemq/jmdns/1.0-RC2/jmdns-1.0-RC2.jar
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/activemq/jmdns/1.0-RC2/jmdns-1.0-RC2.jar
80K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1//org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec/1.1/geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1.jar
Downloading

Tranql connectors released

2007-09-27 Thread David Jencks
After the recent tranql-oracle bug fix for non-spec-compliant lack of  
commit-on-setting autocommit I've done a bunch of cleanup in the  
tranql connectors:


- updated license headers to refer to the tranql team rather than any  
particular contributor (changed after consultation with Jeremy and Matt)
- use maven-remote-resources-plugin to install LiCENSE and a  
generated NOTICE file into every artifact (most were missing at least  
one of these)

- regularize the directory structure to match the project names
- and finally a code change... eliminate duplicate and unused MCF  
config-properties.


I've now released new copies of all the connectors:

base: 1.4
db2: 1.1
derby: 1.4
mysql: 1.0
oracle: 1.3
postgresql: 1.0

These ought to be getting to the maven central repo shortly and I  
will work on updating geronimo to use and include all of these.


thanks
david jencks



Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-27 Thread David Blevins


On Sep 27, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:



On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:



On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

OK, I'm done updating the 2.0.x closed issues (sorry for all the  
JIRA emails.)


The only one I couldn't figure out, was:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3423


Donald,
Thanks a bunch for going through all of those Jiras!

David Blevins,
Are we missing 3423 in branches/2.0?


Heh. Looks like I merged the change to branches/2.0 in revision  
570950 -- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=570950.


:)

-David



[DISCUSS] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.1 Release plan

2007-09-27 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi, I would like to starting discussing what we think should be included in the 
2.0.1 release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin. I have some very preliminary 
thoughts that I have listed below but would like to encourage input from others. 
My initial thoughts are:


1. High priority JIRAs
2. Inclusion of the latest WTP release candidate
3. Build and test infrastructure improvements (e.g., build cleanup/improvements, 
execution of testcases during the build, a testsuite framework for the plugin, 
and a useful set of samples).

4. Full support for the Geronimo 2.0 deployment plans

--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell


Re: Geronimo box on Download page still says 1.1

2007-09-27 Thread Hernan Cunico

OK, after dusting off my old and very basic photoshop skills, and following the 
idea Shiva pointed out, I created a new template for the  software box. It has 
some minor differences which I think makes it look a little bit better. The 
good thing is that now we have the .psd source files and I tried to be as clear 
as I could with the labeling the layers.

I committed the new templates and samples here.

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art/sandbox/Hernan/

Cheers!
Hernan

Hernan Cunico wrote:
g, reading those tutorials make it look so simple, why I didn't 
think about using those features in PS before. :-P


Good catch Shiva, thanks for the pointer. I'll work on some .psd and 
commit them soon.


Cheers!
Hernan

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:

Yes Hernan, let's create our own boxes.

Found these useful tutorials upon Google search for software box:
http://tutorialblog.org/create-a-software-box/ 
http://tutorialblog.org/create-a-software-box/

http://www.designtutorials.info/software-box-design/

Adobe Photoshop is used in both the tutorials.

- Shiva

On 9/26/07, *Hernan Cunico* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Shiva,
The .psd you see there are the templates we used as guidelines long
time ago then we overhauled the whole site.

We don't have the source files for the boxed images and I have no
idea what software was used to create them. We rely on asking other
projects to help us with this update. I asked several times what was
the software used but never get a reply.

I don't check all the commits and I was certainly unaware that those
files got finally committed. If we can't get the source nor the
details on how these boxed images got created then we should
consider creating a new set of images. What you guys think?

Cheers!
Hernan

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
  I also see some .psd files! in the same location. Must be the
source for
  those boxes. Hernan can you try opening them with your Adobe
Photoshop?
 
  - Shiva
 
  On 9/26/07, * Vamsavardhana Reddy* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hernan,
 
  I see some 2.0 box images at
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/art
and they
  have been there since end of March!!  Can you update the
downloads
  page to show a 2.0 box?
 
  Vamsi
 
  On 8/22/07, *Hernan Cunico*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I've been trying for ages to get these updated. I asked 
folks

  from other projects using similar boxes but couldn't
figure out
  what software they were using.
 
  All I have is the Photoshop suit but I'm sure those were
created
  with something else.
 
  Cheers!
  Hernan
 
  Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Does anyone know how to get an updated box for
Geronimo that says
2.0.1?  Since its the first thing people see on that 
page

  seems like it
would make more sense for the release number to be the
most
  recent.  I'm
happy to do it but not sure what software was used.