how to use servicemix-http?

please With simple examples to illustrate how the use of components:servicemix-http! maybe servicemix-http 3.1 use in servicemix3.2? thanks！ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-use-servicemix-http--tf4637714s12049.html#a13245401 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev

Re: how to use servicemix-http?

You have some examples in the distribution. Have you checked those? On 10/17/07, cui.hailin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: please With simple examples to illustrate how the use of components:servicemix-http! maybe servicemix-http 3.1 use in servicemix3.2? thanks！ -- View this message in

Re: Scheduling 3.2 release

Hi Guillaume, I'd like to be the release manager this time, if there is no opposition. :-) Best Regards Freeman Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, we need to start it asap. Any volunteer to manage this release ? On 10/16/07, jpuro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any word on the release? -jeff

Re: Scheduling 3.2 release

Oh nice :-) We may want to commit Kristian's patch on the geronimo plugins, and maybe the ones from Oleg too to solve some failing test cases (though they are currently disabled and usually do not involve any problems in servicemix, so it's not a top priority). On 10/17/07, Freeman Fang [EMAIL

allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

Hi, I am trying to simulate the allowHosts feature for geronimo 2.0.1 which was available in geronimo 1.2. With geronimo 1.2 it works fine and I am able to restrict access to EJB application running on the server to specific ip addresses. With AG 2.0.1 this attribute is not allowed. Do we

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

+1 (Sorry for the late vote - My laptop died) Jay Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3533) monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

monitoring pluging: cleanup poms Key: GERONIMO-3533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3533 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues)

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3533) monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3533: --- Attachment: geronimo-3533.patch monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

Re: Scheduling 3.2 release

Any word on the release? -jeff gnodet wrote: I'm going through the remaining JIRA assigned for 3.2. If anybody has any important issues to schedule there (or patches to apply), please yell ! I'd like to put 3.2 in release mode asap. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

Thanks Erik. Even with increasing it to your settings my OpenSUSE still hangs at the point of installing the car-maven-plugin. Things must have really changed with this plugin to require substantially more memory or perhaps there are other issues. I think I may just install a new OS on

Re: Scheduling 3.2 release

Yeah, we need to start it asap. Any volunteer to manage this release ? On 10/16/07, jpuro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any word on the release? -jeff gnodet wrote: I'm going through the remaining JIRA assigned for 3.2. If anybody has any important issues to schedule there (or patches to

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

Maybe try getting a thread dump while the process appears to be hanging (kill -QUIT jvm process). That might give a clue on what's going on. Jarek On 10/16/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Erik. Even with increasing it to your settings my OpenSUSE still hangs at the point of

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Maybe try getting a thread dump while the process appears to be hanging (kill -QUIT jvm process). That might give a clue on what's going on. You can also try tracking memory utilization (since there have been multiple reports of needing more

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

Joe, On nique you can use the IBM JDK to get a heap dump. Although, the question I have is does your system hang in terms of 0% CPU or some % CPU? If your CPU is at 0 its probably another problem not related to heap. The thread dump is a good idea. On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Joe

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 585177

Geronimo Revision: 585177 built with tests included See the full build-0600.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071016/build-0600.log Building Geronimo 2.0 at Revision: 585177 [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 585177

Geronimo Revision: 585177 built with tests included See the full build-0600.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071016/build-0600.log Building Geronimo 2.0 at Revision: 585177 [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

Thanks for all the responses! The cpu is at 0. It seems that the problem is related to building in the background using nohup and tailing the output. If I build in the foreground without nohup then I don't see the hang. The hang is always during the installation of the car-maven-plugin.

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

Now that you mention it, I think I also had some problems with nohup but it was quite a while ago... I just switched to screen instead. It works well for me. Jarek On 10/16/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for all the responses! The cpu is at 0. It seems that the problem is

An ejb security question

Can someone help me with an ejb security question? I have an EJB with three methods, m1 with unrestricted access, m2 accessible by guest role and m3 accessible by guest and admin roles. I am accessing all these three methods from three different jsps and displaying whether the access is successful

Fwd: Geronimo Status Report for October - 2007

Forgot to copy the dev and PMC lists. Begin forwarded message: From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: October 16, 2007 1:36:52 PM EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Geronimo Status Report for October - 2007 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Included is the Geronimo Board report for October -

http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html

Just a small thought, since I think we are trying to move G 1.2 and 1.1 users onto G 2.0 maybe we should separate 2.0 downloads from the older downloads. Right now all the downloads are under the same Available releases tab. I would propose creating Current releases tab with the latest 2.0.x

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3490) Missing Jetty Connector stats

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535389 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3490: -- I have changed isStatisticsProvider to mean stats

Re: http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html

+1. Most popular downloads (Maven, SunJZDK etc) are like this. Cheers Prasad On 10/16/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a small thought, since I think we are trying to move G 1.2 and 1.1 users onto G 2.0 maybe we should separate 2.0 downloads from the older downloads. Right now