Build problem

2007-10-28 Thread Heinz Drews
Hello, is there any fix or bypass available to get rid of [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. Missing: -- 1)

Re: Build problem

2007-10-28 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 10/28/07, Heinz Drews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, is there any fix or bypass available to get rid of [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: Build problem

2007-10-28 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 28, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Heinz Drews wrote: Hello, is there any fix or bypass available to get rid of [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: Build problem

2007-10-28 Thread Heinz Drews
Kevan, that was the cure, thanks. On 10/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 28, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Heinz Drews wrote: Hello, is there any fix or bypass available to get rid of [INFO] [ERROR]

Re: deploying snapshots of the samples to a new location in m2-snapshot-repo

2007-10-28 Thread Donald Woods
Cool, thanks. Any thoughts on setting up automated builds of Samples at least once a week? Also, maybe a samples project under the server testsuite dir that verifies each sample can be installed and functions? -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: This should be fixed now plus some other things

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

2007-10-28 Thread Jason Dillon
I'm obviously +1 for a sub-project ;-) --jason On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please list the pros and cons. Here's my list: Pro's * Easier for other

Re: TCK access

2007-10-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I sent him a private ping as well just as a heads up. On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I think that Geir has to ACK that the paperwork was completed. Has he done

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

2007-10-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 Jason's +1 On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'm obviously +1 for a sub-project ;-) --jason On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please list