Re: Need some advice on how to include repository/* bits in the boilerplate
On May 15, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, so now the plugins are doing the trick... yay... thanks David! But, now I'm wondering, when the server loads, it shows those plugins loading, which is fine I guess... but I'm wondering if they are eating up memory or building classpath muck that is never going to be used by the server (or well, not until we get support for running an rshd instance in the server). Hmm, how are they added to the config? If they are ancestors of j2ee- system then they get into the base geronimo classloader. Most likely they are getting started but the resulting classloader is not a parent of anything. We can prevent them from even starting by having another server configuration that they are specified for in the plugin goo, similar to how the client-* plugins work. thanks david jencks --jason On May 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: On May 13, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Attached patch includes other changes, like moving to jaxb 2.1, some security changes, I thought I left out the security changes, sorry. Comes from trying to do too many things at once :-( Other comments attached to GERONIMO-4013. I may have been unclear. I wasn't suggesting my initial GERONIMO-4013 patch was suitable to be committed, but that it might let us figure out some of the problems with the idea of the car- maven-plugin including maven transitive dependencies before we broke everything at once. In particular it looks to me as if the dependencies for the gshell-* plugins are too all-inclusive and was wondering what to do about this. For instance, I have no problem with removing gshell-embeddable, but would prefer to get the car-maven-plugin working better before attacking that problem. thanks david jencks -Donald David Jencks wrote: I've attached a patch to GERONIMO-4013 that reverses the changes from 4012 and change the car-maven-plugin to optionally follow transitive dependencies. I think if you apply my patch you won't be using the gshell-* plugins. I had to make a couple other minor build changes to get the build to complete. The server builds and shows signs of starting -- on my copy it runs into some problems with unrelated changes to the security system I'm working on. Jason, can you check the generated dependencies in the gshell-* plugins to see if they look remotely plausible or can be nudged closer to plausible? thanks david jencks On May 13, 2008, at 11:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: I talked with jason a bit on irc and we're doing an experiment with optionally including transitive dependencies using the car- maven-plugin. Hopefully this will work and avoid the duplication jason is leery of. Please don't commit duplication until we find out if this works or not. AFAICT this isn't a bug fix but rather new development so I'm unclear about why you are thinking of including this in 2.1.2? thanks david jencks On May 13, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Donald Woods wrote: I started with your new framework/configs/gshell-* code, updated gshell-framework to include all the individual depends so we don't need gshell-embeddable, updated server/pom.xml with the new depends and updated boilerplate with the new gshell- geronimo car depend and it looks promising. I'm still exercising some of the gsh commands, but so far help, geronimo/ start-server, deploy/connect and geronimo/stop-server are working If all looks well after a few more tests, I'll commit the changes into trunk for everyone to review before we spend the time pulling it into 2.1.2. -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: On May 13, 2008, at 1:14 AM, David Jencks wrote: So including the dependencies you need for gshell in the boilerplate's pom would get them into the geronimo repo. As I said transitive dependencies don't result in inclusion at the moment for rather good reasons. I don't know what the include tag would do but it's probably worth investigating. What include tag are you talking about? I guess I'm gonna try to make plugins for the gshell dependencies, these 3: gshell-framework - just the core bits required to make gshell work gshell-geronimo - our additional commands to work with the server + their deps gshell-remote - the remote/whisper commands I must say I'm really quite frustrated at the lack of transitive dependency support here. As this means that alot of the dependencyManagement configuration which is already in the GShell poms need to be duplicated into the Geronimo poms, making version management even more of a nightmare. :-( Well, I started to add these cars to framework/configs, but I must admit I really am clueless for how this stuff works now. :-( --jason
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 656947
Geronimo Revision: 656947 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 34 minutes 21 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri May 16 03:37:54 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 360M/809M
[INFO]
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/logs-0300-tomcat/test.log
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [selenium:start-server {execution: start}]
Launching Selenium Server
Waiting for Selenium Server...
[INFO] Including display properties from:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/display.properties
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/server.log
[INFO] User extensions:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/user-extensions.js
Selenium Server started
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
[INFO] [geronimo:start-server {execution: start}]
[INFO] Using assembly configuration: tomcat
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] Using assembly artifact:
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding:
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:38.578
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 27 test build(s)
[INFO]
[INFO]
---
[INFO]
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:01:36.932) Java
returned: 1
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:01:39.486)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:46.306)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalRUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalSUCCESS (0:01:04.009)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:41.327)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsSUCCESS (0:00:29.947)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:27.942)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsSUCCESS (0:03:42.290)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.366)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:44.262)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests
Re: Google Analytics
Can someone add jaw981 at gmail.com as well? Thanks! On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave. Can you add [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Alan On May 14, 2008, at 11:32 PM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. -David -- ~Jason Warner
Re: Google Analytics
me too please ... joebohn at gmail thanks Joe Jason Warner wrote: Can someone add jaw981 at gmail.com http://gmail.com as well? Thanks! On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave. Can you add [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Regards, Alan On May 14, 2008, at 11:32 PM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. -David -- ~Jason Warner
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4022) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] aaron pieper updated GERONIMO-4022: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data Key: GERONIMO-4022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 1.x Reporter: aaron pieper Priority: Minor QuotedPrintableDecoderStream.read(byte[], int, int) returns 0 when there are no more bytes to be read. It should return -1. One result of this errant return value is that org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.copy(InputStream, OutputStream) will enter an endless loop if given a QuotedPrintableDecoderStream. Note: This affects geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.jar. I'm not sure what version of geronimo this corresponds to, so I'm recording it as 1.x which is the closest match -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4022) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data
QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data Key: GERONIMO-4022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 1.x Reporter: aaron pieper QuotedPrintableDecoderStream.read(byte[], int, int) returns 0 when there are no more bytes to be read. It should return -1. One result of this errant return value is that org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.copy(InputStream, OutputStream) will enter an endless loop if given a QuotedPrintableDecoderStream. Note: This affects geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.jar. I'm not sure what version of geronimo this corresponds to, so I'm recording it as 1.x which is the closest match -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4022) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] aaron pieper updated GERONIMO-4022: --- Attachment: patch.txt QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data Key: GERONIMO-4022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 1.x Reporter: aaron pieper Priority: Minor Attachments: patch.txt QuotedPrintableDecoderStream.read(byte[], int, int) returns 0 when there are no more bytes to be read. It should return -1. One result of this errant return value is that org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.copy(InputStream, OutputStream) will enter an endless loop if given a QuotedPrintableDecoderStream. Note: This affects geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.jar. I'm not sure what version of geronimo this corresponds to, so I'm recording it as 1.x which is the closest match -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4022) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-4022: -- Assignee: Rick McGuire QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data Key: GERONIMO-4022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 1.x Reporter: aaron pieper Assignee: Rick McGuire Priority: Minor Attachments: patch.txt QuotedPrintableDecoderStream.read(byte[], int, int) returns 0 when there are no more bytes to be read. It should return -1. One result of this errant return value is that org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.copy(InputStream, OutputStream) will enter an endless loop if given a QuotedPrintableDecoderStream. Note: This affects geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.jar. I'm not sure what version of geronimo this corresponds to, so I'm recording it as 1.x which is the closest match -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4022) QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-4022. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 Committed revision 657022. Thanks aaron! QuotedPrintableDecoderStream read should return -1 when no more data Key: GERONIMO-4022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4022 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 1.x Reporter: aaron pieper Assignee: Rick McGuire Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.2 Attachments: patch.txt QuotedPrintableDecoderStream.read(byte[], int, int) returns 0 when there are no more bytes to be read. It should return -1. One result of this errant return value is that org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.copy(InputStream, OutputStream) will enter an endless loop if given a QuotedPrintableDecoderStream. Note: This affects geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.jar. I'm not sure what version of geronimo this corresponds to, so I'm recording it as 1.x which is the closest match -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3947) Apache OFBiz deploys and runs under WASCE 2 but not under Geronimo 2.0.1 (nor 2.1)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597430#action_12597430 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on GERONIMO-3947: --- Hi Donald, Finally I found another solution which allowed me not to have to go to through the patching work. Thanks anyway, I will maybe need it later... Thanks for the minimal link too BTW. Apache OFBiz deploys and runs under WASCE 2 but not under Geronimo 2.0.1 (nor 2.1) -- Key: GERONIMO-3947 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3947 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: deployment Affects Versions: 2.0.1 Environment: XP SP2, Java Sun sdk 1.5_011 Reporter: Jacques Le Roux With deployer tool, I get this error Module was not a war: framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/ With this WAR (deployed, not in a jar file) through its plan from console, I get this error Cannot deploy the requested application module because no deployer is able to handle it. This can happen if you have omitted the J2EE deployment descriptor, disabled a deployer module, or if, for example, you are trying to deploy an EJB module on a minimal Geronimo server that does not have EJB support installed. (planFile=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0.1\var\temp\geronimo-web.xml) There is a web.xml used in OFBiz without problems (OFBiz runs with Tomcat embedded) The C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0.1\var\temp\geronimo-web.xml deployment plan is web-app xmlns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-2.0; xmlns:dep=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.2; xmlns:naming=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.2; xmlns:security=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/security-1.2; dep:environment dep:moduleId dep:groupIdorg.ofbiz.webtools/dep:groupId dep:artifactIdwebtools/dep:artifactId dep:version1.0/dep:version dep:typewar/dep:type /dep:moduleId dep:dependencies/ dep:hidden-classes/ dep:non-overridable-classes/ /dep:environment context-root/webtools/context-root /web-app Am I missing something ? I thought that, since I got any problems with WASCE 2, it should work also in Geronimo. If you need more information, there is a guidelines at http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Ah Thanks -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Yoko ORB subproject 1.0, RC2
The vote to release the Yoko 1.0 artifacts passes with 4 +1 votes, and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting in favor of the release were Rick McGuire Jay McHugh Donald Woods Joe Bohn The Yoko artifacts will be released to central today. Rick
Re: Google Analytics
can someone add me also ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Viet
Re: Google Analytics
David, Could you please add dan.o.becker atgmail.com. Donald Woods wrote: Can someone add me to the list? donaldrwoods at gmail -Donald David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. -- Thanks, Dan Becker
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4016) The exception of failing to start client is not recorded in client.log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597454#action_12597454
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4016:
Client cmdline output also needs to be cleaned up some
The exception of failing to start client is not recorded in client.log
--
Key: GERONIMO-4016
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4016
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public(Regular issues)
Components: Logging
Affects Versions: 2.1.2, 2.1.x
Environment: Windows
Reporter: YunFeng Ma
Assignee: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.1.x
Attachments: GERONIMO-4016.patch
Run the following command in %GERONIMO_HOME%\bin
client.bat abc/not-exist-artifact/1.0/car
get the following exception, but the exception is not recorded in client.log
{noformat}
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.LifecycleException: load of
abc/no-exist-artifact/1.0/car failed
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:276)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:615)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:124)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:832)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.loadConfigurations(CommandLine.java:187)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.invokeMainGBean(CommandLine.java:98)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.startClient(ClientCommandLine.java:77)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.execute(ClientCommandLine.java:63)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.EmbeddedClientCommandLine.execute(EmbeddedClientCommandLine.java:43)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.main(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:45)
at
org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:67)
at org.apache.geronimo.cli.client.ClientCLI.main(ClientCLI.java:30)
Caused by:
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.NoSuchConfigException:
abc/no-exist-artifact/1.0/car
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfigurationData(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:476)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:273)
... 15 more
{noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4016) The exception of failing to start client is not recorded in client.log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-4016:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
The exception of failing to start client is not recorded in client.log
--
Key: GERONIMO-4016
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4016
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public(Regular issues)
Components: Logging
Affects Versions: 2.1.2, 2.1.x
Environment: Windows
Reporter: YunFeng Ma
Assignee: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.1.x
Attachments: GERONIMO-4016.patch
Run the following command in %GERONIMO_HOME%\bin
client.bat abc/not-exist-artifact/1.0/car
get the following exception, but the exception is not recorded in client.log
{noformat}
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.LifecycleException: load of
abc/no-exist-artifact/1.0/car failed
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:276)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:615)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:124)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:832)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.loadConfigurations(CommandLine.java:187)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.invokeMainGBean(CommandLine.java:98)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.startClient(ClientCommandLine.java:77)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.execute(ClientCommandLine.java:63)
at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.EmbeddedClientCommandLine.execute(EmbeddedClientCommandLine.java:43)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.main(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:45)
at
org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:67)
at org.apache.geronimo.cli.client.ClientCLI.main(ClientCLI.java:30)
Caused by:
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.NoSuchConfigException:
abc/no-exist-artifact/1.0/car
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfigurationData(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:476)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:273)
... 15 more
{noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3971) Error message during assembling a server
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3971: -- Assignee: Donald Woods Error message during assembling a server Key: GERONIMO-3971 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3971 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: Plugins Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2 Environment: Windows Reporter: YunFeng Ma Assignee: Donald Woods Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 The following error message (3 lines) are reported on Geronimo launch console during assembling a server: 16:09:05,484 ERROR [LocalAttributeManager] Caught exception java.io.FileNotFound Exception: H:\geronimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substit utions.properties (系统找不到指定的文件。) trying to open properties file H:\ger onimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substitutions.properties 16:09:05,500 ERROR [LocalAttributeManager] Caught exception java.io.FileNotFound Exception: H:\geronimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substit utions.properties (系统找不到指定的文件。) trying to open properties file H:\ger onimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substitutions.properties 16:09:05,515 ERROR [LocalAttributeManager] Caught exception java.io.FileNotFound Exception: H:\geronimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substit utions.properties (系统找不到指定的文件。) trying to open properties file H:\ger onimo server1\var\temp\assembly\var\config\config-substitutions.properties -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4011) Need new release of JLine to fix GShell problems on Windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597464#action_12597464 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4011: From Yun Feng - I've tried the new JLine, and the results are bellow: 1. Can get the previous multi-lines command just the first time, then afterward all the multi-lines command can not be handled properly. 2. For the multi-lines command, still can not move the cursor to the first line. Need new release of JLine to fix GShell problems on Windows --- Key: GERONIMO-4011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4011 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: dependencies Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2 Reporter: Donald Woods Assignee: Jason Dillon Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 Attachments: jline-0.9.95-SNAPSHOT.jar There are several GShell problems on Windows, due to JLine bugs. I'm going to try and create a patched build of JLine 0.9.94 to resolve these issues, as Geronimo packages the JLine jar into our assembly for GShell to use. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: ASF hosted machines for TCK testing
Matt Hogstrom wrote: I did a quick search on the web for what it would take to build two systems. Here is the initial SWAG. SuperMicro CSE-825S2-R700LPV U2 Rackmountable eATX Case (700W PSU, Silver)$750 x 2 = $1500 Sony DRU190A 20X DVD Rewritable Drive - 20x DVD±R $40 x 2 =80 Dynatron H53G 2U CPU Heatsink For Intel Xeon $50 x 4 = 200 Memory - 2GB DDR2 667 ECC Fully Buffered $80 x 16 = 1280 Disk - Western Digital Caviar RE2 WD7500AYYS 750GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA$200 x 4 = 800 Here is a SWAG at what we'd need to put two 8-core 16GB systems with logical mirroring 750GB storage. The cost is $3860 from the above. I'd round up to $4000 for tax, shipping, etc. We might be able to buy other systems for a lower price point. I've rounded to be conservative on cost. I would Run Linux with Xen and 4 VM's per server which would give us 8 server instances to work from. Thoughts welcome. Motherboard Information http://shopper.cnet.com/cases/supermicro-cse-825s2-r700lpv/4014-3030_9-31954268.html Heatsink Information http://www.netfreez.com/?p=catalogmode=searchsearch_in=tagssearchstr=xeon DVD Information http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3569869CatId=482 Memory http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208200 Disk http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136144 Matt, This is great detail. Thanks for pulling it together. I think it would be great if we could build and donate those machines ... but from some discussions with infra it seems they would prefer to order machines directly. That way they can call in for support as the owners of the machines and they can ensure that they meet all of their requirements for power supplies, rack dimensions, rails, etc ... plus have some general standards in the configuration. Anything we can do to make their life easier is a plus. I will use your detailed analysis for the request though, which I plan to have in a proposal on this list very soon. Thanks, Joe
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4011) Need new release of JLine to fix GShell problems on Windows
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597490#action_12597490 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-4011: Aye, the mutli-line paste stuff is stilll pendeing me knowing whats broke to fix ;-) Need new release of JLine to fix GShell problems on Windows --- Key: GERONIMO-4011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4011 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: dependencies Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2 Reporter: Donald Woods Assignee: Jason Dillon Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 Attachments: jline-0.9.95-SNAPSHOT.jar There are several GShell problems on Windows, due to JLine bugs. I'm going to try and create a patched build of JLine 0.9.94 to resolve these issues, as Geronimo packages the JLine jar into our assembly for GShell to use. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 657049
Geronimo Revision: 657049 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 36 minutes 46 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri May 16 09:40:27 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 345M/1005M
[INFO]
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/logs-0900-tomcat/test.log
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [selenium:start-server {execution: start}]
Launching Selenium Server
Waiting for Selenium Server...
[INFO] Including display properties from:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/display.properties
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/server.log
[INFO] User extensions:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/user-extensions.js
Selenium Server started
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
[INFO] [geronimo:start-server {execution: start}]
[INFO] Using assembly configuration: tomcat
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] Using assembly artifact:
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding:
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:37.982
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 27 test build(s)
[INFO]
[INFO]
---
[INFO]
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:01:33.571) Java
returned: 1
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:01:39.396)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:44.489)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalRUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalSUCCESS (0:00:50.522)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:42.119)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsSUCCESS (0:00:29.905)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:27.099)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsSUCCESS (0:00:27.380)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:00:33.811)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:44.187)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests
Re: Google Analytics
On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. --kevan
Re: Google Analytics
Kevan Miller wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. --kevan Thanks Kevan! It works for me. I don't think the information poses any privacy issue concerns so I think it would be ok to open it up to non-committers. Should we be concerned that somebody could use this against us in some fashion - perhaps to demonstrate how some other project is getting more interest than G based on hit volumes? If that is not a concern then I think an email report to dev would perhaps lessen the need to manage a large list of non-committers. Joe
ASF hosted machines - proposal
Here is a proposal for the ASF hosted machines to run TCK. Please let me know if you think changes necessary. Once we get it to a state that we agree upon, I will forward it to the Geronimo PMC for further approval and for the PMC to make the request to ASF infra. It would be great if we could get this to the PMC by Monday, 5/19. Rational: The Apache Geronimo community has a need to support the execution and sharing of results from Sun certification tests (cts) which are necessary gain JavaEE5 certification compliance. This information is only available to those Geronimo committers that have signed the Sun NDA and other Apache committers that have signed an NDA and gained approval of the Apache Geronimo PMC. As such, this is becoming a resource for not only the Apache Geronimo but also other ASF projects. In the past these resource intensive tests have been run on private machines by individuals. As more people become involved with Apache Geronimo and related projects, it is becoming obvious that we need a central system to run and share the results of these tests. Request: To fulfill this requirement, the Apache Geronimo PMC is requesting the ASF infrastructure team to provide and host machines that can be used for this purpose. Initially, we would like to request two (2) machines that meet (as closely as possible) the specification below. However, we can see the need for 2 additional machines in the not too distant future. Machine specs: - 8 core (two 3.0 GHz quad-core) - 16 GB memory - two 750GB 7200 - rpm SATA 3GB/s disks - DVD R/W (20x?) - rack mountable specification to work with ASF infra requirements - LOM or other features as necessary for ASF infra support - to be developer managed and maintained by the Apache Geronimo Team - Apache Geronimo would assume all responsibility for: - configuration - backup/recovery - secure access - Strictly limited to those Apache Geronimo committers with NDAs on file or additional Apache committers with NDAs and approved by Geronimo PMC. - full, admin access would be granted to ASF infra with reboot directions - At least 2 active Apache Geronimo committers (with NDA authorization) would identified to manage the machines. - Running Linux with something like Xen for 4 VM images per machine - Automation will most likely be added to run builds, execute tests, and produce reports. - Capability to manually run tests on demand would also be supported. Joe
Re: Google Analytics
On May 16, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. --kevan Thanks Kevan! It works for me. I don't think the information poses any privacy issue concerns so I think it would be ok to open it up to non-committers. Should we be concerned that somebody could use this against us in some fashion - perhaps to demonstrate how some other project is getting more interest than G based on hit volumes? If that is not a concern then I think an email report to dev would perhaps lessen the need to manage a large list of non-committers. Don't know how the data might be used. But don't think we have anything to hide, either... I wouldn't want to cause email clutter with reports. Not sure if reports can be grouped in a single email, etc. Also not sure what information might be useful. For now, I might just let people access the data. If we think email reports would be useful, then we can set that up at anytime... So, I would give PMC members Administrator rights to the group, committers and anyone who asks User rights to the groups. Anyone see issues with that? --kevan
Re: Google Analytics
Kevan, I think that suggestion makes sense. I guess on that note, if you could add [EMAIL PROTECTED] for User rights to the group. Thanks! -Joseph Leong On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 16, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. --kevan Thanks Kevan! It works for me. I don't think the information poses any privacy issue concerns so I think it would be ok to open it up to non-committers. Should we be concerned that somebody could use this against us in some fashion - perhaps to demonstrate how some other project is getting more interest than G based on hit volumes? If that is not a concern then I think an email report to dev would perhaps lessen the need to manage a large list of non-committers. Don't know how the data might be used. But don't think we have anything to hide, either... I wouldn't want to cause email clutter with reports. Not sure if reports can be grouped in a single email, etc. Also not sure what information might be useful. For now, I might just let people access the data. If we think email reports would be useful, then we can set that up at anytime... So, I would give PMC members Administrator rights to the group, committers and anyone who asks User rights to the groups. Anyone see issues with that? --kevan
Re: Webapp-based Tuscany/Geronimo integration in Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 release
Hi Raymond, One minor netiquette comment... Looks like you used a Reply To button when generating your note (then changed the subject line). Some mail readers will still group your email in the previous email thread (one example is Mac OS X Mail). This can cause emails to be lost/cause confusion. So, it's best to avoid... More below. On May 15, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, In the recently released Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 [1], we produce a whitepaper [2] to describe webapp-based Tuscany/Geronimo integration. We would like to share the information here and hope it can trigger more interests from both Geronimo and Tuscany community to bring more values into these areas collaboratively. Thanks! Developing SOA based solutions can be very complex and expensive. Apache Tuscany provides a lightweight infrastructure which enables users to easily implement SOA based solutions or to use their existing assets and align them with SOA principles which would support a business model that can extend and expand as business needs change. Apache Tuscany implements SCA specifications that is being standardized at OASIS. Tuscany provides the capabilities to construct, assemble and deploy composite applications using SCA. This white paper explains how Tuscany integrates with Apache Geronimo, a fully certified Java EE 5 application server runtime, to provide added value to users wanting to develop SOA solutions using Geronimo as a platform. The added values include: * Extensibility of component implementation technologies * Extensibility of transport and protocol abstractions * A notion of cross-application/cross-network assembly and configuration * Integration of SCA with existing or new EJB based applications The following are a set of usage scenarios that both JEE and SCA developers could be interested in. * Access SCA composites from Java EE components using JEE programming model * Access session beans from SCA service components * Expose SCA services as session beans or web services * Include Session Beans in a single SCA composition by providing an SCA implementation for session beans. * Inject SCA service references to web components to enable Web 2.0 * Expose enterprise applications into an SCA domain * Use recursive SCA assembly in enterprise applications [1] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-releases.html [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/tuscany-web-application-based-integration-with-geronimo.html Is there interest in tighter integration between Tuscany/Geronimo? Would there be interest in generating a Tuscany Plugin for Geronimo? Running Tuscany as a service? --kevan
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346) Adding security roles in the Geronimo Deployment Plan Editor does not work
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] B.J. Reed updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346: --- Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346.patch I think this problem is bigger than just the add/edit/remove buttons. Originally, I was unable to get any security page changes to show up in the geronimo-application.xml. This patch should allow all security data to be saved and should also have the add/edit/remove buttons interacting properly with the table of security roles. Adding security roles in the Geronimo Deployment Plan Editor does not work -- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Bug Components: eclipse-plugin Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Environment: Eclipse Europa Winter (WTP 2.0.2), Windows XP SP2, Geronimo 2.1.1, GEP 2.1.0, Reporter: Cedric Hurst Assignee: B.J. Reed Fix For: 2.1.1 Attachments: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-346.patch Original Estimate: 0h Remaining Estimate: 0h Steps to reproduce === 1. Create a new Enterprise Application Project 2. Open the geronimo-application.xml file in the graphical editor 3. Select the security tab 4. Click the add button in the Security Roles section 5. Provide any value for name and/or description and click Finish Expected behavior === New role will show up in the Security Role list and in the source view of geronimo-application.xml Actual behavior === Role does not show up, nor is it added the the actual xml file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: ASF hosted machines - proposal
Joe, thanks for pulling this together. Just a couple more questions - For the vm images, do we want them behind a NAT or using public IP addresses, with the later being important in the request due to an additional infrastructure requirement... Do we need to mention any network bandwidth requirements or projected download/upload amounts? Also, do we want VNC access to the host and guest systems, or only access them via ssh? -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: Here is a proposal for the ASF hosted machines to run TCK. Please let me know if you think changes necessary. Once we get it to a state that we agree upon, I will forward it to the Geronimo PMC for further approval and for the PMC to make the request to ASF infra. It would be great if we could get this to the PMC by Monday, 5/19. Rational: The Apache Geronimo community has a need to support the execution and sharing of results from Sun certification tests (cts) which are necessary gain JavaEE5 certification compliance. This information is only available to those Geronimo committers that have signed the Sun NDA and other Apache committers that have signed an NDA and gained approval of the Apache Geronimo PMC. As such, this is becoming a resource for not only the Apache Geronimo but also other ASF projects. In the past these resource intensive tests have been run on private machines by individuals. As more people become involved with Apache Geronimo and related projects, it is becoming obvious that we need a central system to run and share the results of these tests. Request: To fulfill this requirement, the Apache Geronimo PMC is requesting the ASF infrastructure team to provide and host machines that can be used for this purpose. Initially, we would like to request two (2) machines that meet (as closely as possible) the specification below. However, we can see the need for 2 additional machines in the not too distant future. Machine specs: - 8 core (two 3.0 GHz quad-core) - 16 GB memory - two 750GB 7200 - rpm SATA 3GB/s disks - DVD R/W (20x?) - rack mountable specification to work with ASF infra requirements - LOM or other features as necessary for ASF infra support - to be developer managed and maintained by the Apache Geronimo Team - Apache Geronimo would assume all responsibility for: - configuration - backup/recovery - secure access - Strictly limited to those Apache Geronimo committers with NDAs on file or additional Apache committers with NDAs and approved by Geronimo PMC. - full, admin access would be granted to ASF infra with reboot directions - At least 2 active Apache Geronimo committers (with NDA authorization) would identified to manage the machines. - Running Linux with something like Xen for 4 VM images per machine - Automation will most likely be added to run builds, execute tests, and produce reports. - Capability to manually run tests on demand would also be supported. Joe smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Google Analytics
+1 to allow non-committers 'user' access to analytics (Should we have an actual vote or just let this go by if there is lazy consensus?) Jay Kevan Miller wrote: On May 16, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. --kevan Thanks Kevan! It works for me. I don't think the information poses any privacy issue concerns so I think it would be ok to open it up to non-committers. Should we be concerned that somebody could use this against us in some fashion - perhaps to demonstrate how some other project is getting more interest than G based on hit volumes? If that is not a concern then I think an email report to dev would perhaps lessen the need to manage a large list of non-committers. Don't know how the data might be used. But don't think we have anything to hide, either... I wouldn't want to cause email clutter with reports. Not sure if reports can be grouped in a single email, etc. Also not sure what information might be useful. For now, I might just let people access the data. If we think email reports would be useful, then we can set that up at anytime... So, I would give PMC members Administrator rights to the group, committers and anyone who asks User rights to the groups. Anyone see issues with that? --kevan
Re: Google Analytics
On May 16, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: +1 to allow non-committers 'user' access to analytics (Should we have an actual vote or just let this go by if there is lazy consensus?) Thanks for the input. IMO lazy consensus is fine for this. Anyone feels otherwise, we can spin up a vote. --kevan
Re: ASF hosted machines - proposal
Good points Donald ... comments inline Donald Woods wrote: Joe, thanks for pulling this together. Just a couple more questions - For the vm images, do we want them behind a NAT or using public IP addresses, with the later being important in the request due to an additional infrastructure requirement... I'm not well versed the advantages/disadvantages for these .. but I suspect NAT is better. comments? Do we need to mention any network bandwidth requirements or projected download/upload amounts? I'm sure that would be beneficial but I have no idea how to go about quantifying this. ideas? Perhaps we should just see if they inquire more about this. Also, do we want VNC access to the host and guest systems, or only access them via ssh? I think VNC would be beneficial. There are some tests that we've been running via the UI so if we want to run those tests on these machines it would be essential. I've added it below. -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: Here is a proposal for the ASF hosted machines to run TCK. Please let me know if you think changes necessary. Once we get it to a state that we agree upon, I will forward it to the Geronimo PMC for further approval and for the PMC to make the request to ASF infra. It would be great if we could get this to the PMC by Monday, 5/19. Rational: The Apache Geronimo community has a need to support the execution and sharing of results from Sun certification tests (cts) which are necessary gain JavaEE5 certification compliance. This information is only available to those Geronimo committers that have signed the Sun NDA and other Apache committers that have signed an NDA and gained approval of the Apache Geronimo PMC. As such, this is becoming a resource for not only the Apache Geronimo but also other ASF projects. In the past these resource intensive tests have been run on private machines by individuals. As more people become involved with Apache Geronimo and related projects, it is becoming obvious that we need a central system to run and share the results of these tests. Request: To fulfill this requirement, the Apache Geronimo PMC is requesting the ASF infrastructure team to provide and host machines that can be used for this purpose. Initially, we would like to request two (2) machines that meet (as closely as possible) the specification below. However, we can see the need for 2 additional machines in the not too distant future. Machine specs: - 8 core (two 3.0 GHz quad-core) - 16 GB memory - two 750GB 7200 - rpm SATA 3GB/s disks - DVD R/W (20x?) - rack mountable specification to work with ASF infra requirements - LOM or other features as necessary for ASF infra support - to be developer managed and maintained by the Apache Geronimo Team - Apache Geronimo would assume all responsibility for: - configuration - backup/recovery - secure access - Strictly limited to those Apache Geronimo committers with NDAs on file or additional Apache committers with NDAs and approved by Geronimo PMC. - full, admin access would be granted to ASF infra with reboot directions - At least 2 active Apache Geronimo committers (with NDA authorization) would identified to manage the machines. - Running Linux with something like Xen for 4 VM images per machine - We would require both ssh and VNC access to the VMs. - Automation will most likely be added to run builds, execute tests, and produce reports. - Capability to manually run tests on demand would also be supported. Joe
Re: Webapp-based Tuscany/Geronimo integration in Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 release
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Is there interest in tighter integration between Tuscany/Geronimo? Would there be interest in generating a Tuscany Plugin for Geronimo? Running Tuscany as a service? --kevan Yes! I think that would be really useful. Right now we've some ongoing work getting Tomcat and the new Tuscany distributed domain stuff working together so having Geronimo also able to do something similar would be ideal. We've also a Google Summer of Code student working on better Tuscany/SCA management in the Geronimo admin console so that would be helped by this as well. ...ant
Re: Google Analytics
On May 16, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. Thanks David. I've added everyone that's requested access to date, except Dan Becker. I gave all PMC members Administrator access. Committers have User access. What should we do about non-committers requesting access? I don't know why we wouldn't make this information available to anyone who asks. Are there any general privacy issues? If there are, then we should be aware of these issues, even if we don't open up access. If people are interested, I see we can set up a regular email of reports. I'm fine opening it up to anyone. Thanks for taking care of the add requests! -David
Re: ASF hosted machines for TCK testing
On May 15, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Well, you can't donate to 'Geronimo' per se only to the ASF. I wasn't involved directly in this, but I believe the heritage for the machines is AMD - IBM. IBM people used the machines for their geronimo work (including GBuild). I worked with AMD to acquire these systems. When we got the systems from AMD they agreed to provide them for the use of the GBuild project and were never in a corporate owner's asset list. I provided AMD with the ship to address (which I think was David Blevins) so continuing to use them for the Geronimo is totally in line with what the original intention was. I think the machines would be fine except that they are now about 4- years old and had some issues that Jason struggled with so they may not be highly dependable. As far as Lights Out Management I suspect that the this means that we would likely plug them into a remote power management unit so they can be power cycled remotely and not require any manual intervention. I don't know if these machines would qualify for that kind of support. We'll need to investigate that. Is someone tracking them down and do we have a current inventory on what they are? Just a note on these AMD machines, butters and bebe. They're still in the US Simula (now Exist) colo and unless we have another place to put them they'll eventually be shipped off to Hong Kong where the new Exist colo is. They're still up and running, just have no public IPs. The two Dell U1 servers (stan and kyle) I own are sitting in my closet and I'd be happy to hand them over to the ASF. I offered them before, but the lack of power in the cage was really the issue. Happy to throw them back into the pot if we can get that worked out. -David
Re: ASF hosted machines for TCK testing
eh, might as well pull the kids out now... not sure what to do with them, but eh, at the least sell them on ebay and buy me a beer. :-P --jason On May 17, 2008, at 1:47 AM, David Blevins wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Well, you can't donate to 'Geronimo' per se only to the ASF. I wasn't involved directly in this, but I believe the heritage for the machines is AMD - IBM. IBM people used the machines for their geronimo work (including GBuild). I worked with AMD to acquire these systems. When we got the systems from AMD they agreed to provide them for the use of the GBuild project and were never in a corporate owner's asset list. I provided AMD with the ship to address (which I think was David Blevins) so continuing to use them for the Geronimo is totally in line with what the original intention was. I think the machines would be fine except that they are now about 4- years old and had some issues that Jason struggled with so they may not be highly dependable. As far as Lights Out Management I suspect that the this means that we would likely plug them into a remote power management unit so they can be power cycled remotely and not require any manual intervention. I don't know if these machines would qualify for that kind of support. We'll need to investigate that. Is someone tracking them down and do we have a current inventory on what they are? Just a note on these AMD machines, butters and bebe. They're still in the US Simula (now Exist) colo and unless we have another place to put them they'll eventually be shipped off to Hong Kong where the new Exist colo is. They're still up and running, just have no public IPs. The two Dell U1 servers (stan and kyle) I own are sitting in my closet and I'd be happy to hand them over to the ASF. I offered them before, but the lack of power in the cage was really the issue. Happy to throw them back into the pot if we can get that worked out. -David
Re: confluence notifications
These should be working now. FYI, the user that is signed up to get the notifications is geronimo- commits. If you setup a new space, you just need to log in as that user and click the Start watching this space link somewhere under the space details section. There is no real password, you just log in as an administrator and make up a very long random pass for one time use, then use it to log in as the geronimo-commits commits user. -David On May 15, 2008, at 5:28 PM, David Blevins wrote: Seems all the commits lists were updated recently and everyone's notifications were getting filtered again. It should be fixed in a day or two. -David On May 12, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: something probably went wrong on the Confluence side. IIRC Dave Blevins set this up, Dave what UID you used for shooting emails to SCM? the other question that comes to my mind is, is SCM list monitored? any chance these mails getting bounced back? Cheers! Hernan Kevan Miller wrote: On May 12, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: yup, Confluence notifications from SCM are no longer flowing. If you are monitoring the spaces individually then you should still receive the notifications. Is there a reason that this has changed? I think all change notices should be going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confluence updates should be treated the same as code updates... --kevan
Re: ASF hosted machines for TCK testing
Jason Dillon wrote: eh, might as well pull the kids out now... not sure what to do with them, but eh, at the least sell them on ebay and buy me a beer. :-P --jason On May 17, 2008, at 1:47 AM, David Blevins wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Well, you can't donate to 'Geronimo' per se only to the ASF. I wasn't involved directly in this, but I believe the heritage for the machines is AMD - IBM. IBM people used the machines for their geronimo work (including GBuild). I worked with AMD to acquire these systems. When we got the systems from AMD they agreed to provide them for the use of the GBuild project and were never in a corporate owner's asset list. I provided AMD with the ship to address (which I think was David Blevins) so continuing to use them for the Geronimo is totally in line with what the original intention was. I think the machines would be fine except that they are now about 4-years old and had some issues that Jason struggled with so they may not be highly dependable. As far as Lights Out Management I suspect that the this means that we would likely plug them into a remote power management unit so they can be power cycled remotely and not require any manual intervention. I don't know if these machines would qualify for that kind of support. We'll need to investigate that. Is someone tracking them down and do we have a current inventory on what they are? Just a note on these AMD machines, butters and bebe. They're still in the US Simula (now Exist) colo and unless we have another place to put them they'll eventually be shipped off to Hong Kong where the new Exist colo is. They're still up and running, just have no public IPs. The two Dell U1 servers (stan and kyle) I own are sitting in my closet and I'd be happy to hand them over to the ASF. I offered them before, but the lack of power in the cage was really the issue. Happy to throw them back into the pot if we can get that worked out. From what I understand power is still an issue. Apparently space is also a problem at the current data center. There is talk that they might have to get space at another data center, new cage, etc.. to host these machines. I guess we'll hear more once we submit a request. Joe
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3864) Security warning about installation a certificate from a CA claiming to represent: Me
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3864. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 2.1.2 Committed the patch to trunk (revision 657181) and branches/2.1 (revision 657184). Security warning about installation a certificate from a CA claiming to represent: Me - Key: GERONIMO-3864 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3864 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: startup/shutdown Affects Versions: 2.1 Environment: C:\geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1 Mon 02/18/2008 23:53:25.17 ver Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] C:\geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1 Mon 02/18/2008 23:53:27.43 java -version java version 1.6.0_03 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_03-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_03-b05, mixed mode, sharing) C:\geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1 Mon 02/18/2008 23:53:30.79 echo %JAVA_HOME% c:\apps\java6 Reporter: Jacek Laskowski Assignee: Jarek Gawor Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 Attachments: GERONIMO-3864-new.patch, GERONIMO-3864.patch, screenshot-1.jpg When you start geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1 on Windows XP with Java SE 6 you'll get a security warning about installation a certificate from a CA claiming to represent: Me. It doesn't show up with geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1. See the attachment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3974) Shutdown exceptions even for a clean Geronimo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597591#action_12597591 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3974: --- Btw, I only saw these errors on Windows with jdk 1.6_03. Also, once I updated to jdk 1.6_06 these errors disappeared. Shutdown exceptions even for a clean Geronimo - Key: GERONIMO-3974 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3974 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: connector Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2 Environment: Windows Reporter: YunFeng Ma Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.1.2, 2.2 Shutdown a clean Geronimo server, get the following exceptions: Geronimo Application Server started 16:43:00,843 WARN [GeronimoConnectionEventListener] connectionErrorOccurred cal led with null java.sql.SQLException: No current connection. at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknow n Source) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.noCurrentConnection(Unknown Source) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkIfClosed(Unknown Sour ce) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.getAutoCommit(Unknown Sour ce) at org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredConnection.getAutoCommit(Unknown S ource) at org.tranql.connector.jdbc.ConnectionHandle.rollback(ConnectionHandle. java:129) at org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.DefaultDatabaseLocker.stop(DefaultData baseLocker.java:78) at org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.JDBCPersistenceAdapter.stop(JDBCPersis tenceAdapter.java:202) at org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter.stop(Jour nalPersistenceAdapter.java:254) at org.apache.activemq.util.ServiceStopper.stop(ServiceStopper.java:42) at org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.stop(BrokerService.java:443) at org.apache.geronimo.activemq.BrokerServiceGBeanImpl.doStop(BrokerServ iceGBeanImpl.java:119) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.destroyInstance(GBean Instance.java:1161) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStop( GBeanInstanceState.java:339) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:188) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:180) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:180) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:180) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:180) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstan ceState.java:180) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.ja va:563) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.ja va:423) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.KernelConfigurationManager$Shutdown Hook.run(KernelConfigurationManager.java:316) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.notifyShutdownHooks(Basi cKernel.java:668) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.shutdown(BasicKernel.jav a:645) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.KernelGBean.shutdown(KernelGBean.java:382) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl. java:64) at
[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350) Update Source view with unsaved changes in Deployment Plan Editor, or prompt user to save before switching to Source view
Update Source view with unsaved changes in Deployment Plan Editor, or prompt user to save before switching to Source view - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Components: eclipse-plugin Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Environment: Eclipse Europa Winter, Geronimo 2.1.1, GEP 2.1.0 Reporter: Cedric Hurst Assignee: Tim McConnell Attachments: deploymentPlanUnsavedChanges.avi When editing metadata in one of the graphical views of the Deployment Plan Editor (e.g. General, Security, Deployment), any unsaved changes are not reflected after switching to the Source view. This might be confusing for the user, because the expectation is that they are editing a working copy the values of the fields would be consistently reflected in the Source view. I am proposing two possible options (in order of preference): 1. Update the Source view to reflect unsaved changes 2. Prompt the user to save the Deployment Plan before switching from a graphical view to the Source view I will attach a screencast to better demonstrate the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350) Update Source view with unsaved changes in Deployment Plan Editor, or prompt user to save before switching to Source view
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cedric Hurst updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350: -- Attachment: deploymentPlanUnsavedChanges.avi Update Source view with unsaved changes in Deployment Plan Editor, or prompt user to save before switching to Source view - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-350 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Improvement Components: eclipse-plugin Affects Versions: 2.1.0 Environment: Eclipse Europa Winter, Geronimo 2.1.1, GEP 2.1.0 Reporter: Cedric Hurst Assignee: Tim McConnell Attachments: deploymentPlanUnsavedChanges.avi When editing metadata in one of the graphical views of the Deployment Plan Editor (e.g. General, Security, Deployment), any unsaved changes are not reflected after switching to the Source view. This might be confusing for the user, because the expectation is that they are editing a working copy the values of the fields would be consistently reflected in the Source view. I am proposing two possible options (in order of preference): 1. Update the Source view to reflect unsaved changes 2. Prompt the user to save the Deployment Plan before switching from a graphical view to the Source view I will attach a screencast to better demonstrate the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 657169
Geronimo Revision: 657169 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 33 minutes 6 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri May 16 15:36:43 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 350M/1012M
[INFO]
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080516/logs-1500-tomcat/test.log
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [selenium:start-server {execution: start}]
Launching Selenium Server
Waiting for Selenium Server...
[INFO] Including display properties from:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/display.properties
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/server.log
[INFO] User extensions:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/selenium/user-extensions.js
Selenium Server started
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//woodstox/poms/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/woodstox/wstx-asl/3.2.1/wstx-asl-3.2.1.pom
[INFO] [geronimo:start-server {execution: start}]
[INFO] Using assembly configuration: tomcat
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking
for updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] Using assembly artifact:
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding:
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to:
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:39.292
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 27 test build(s)
[INFO]
[INFO]
---
[INFO]
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:01:33.443) Java
returned: 1
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:01:39.689)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:44.728)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalRUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalSUCCESS (0:00:53.155)
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:41.167)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsSUCCESS (0:00:30.217)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:27.539)
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsSUCCESS (0:00:27.970)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:00:33.993)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:43.714)
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests
Re: Google Analytics
Hello, Can someone add me? gianny.damour at gmail.com Thanks, Gianny On 15/05/2008, at 4:32 PM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. -David
Re: Google Analytics
Can someone add me to the list? [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't need a gmail address, just a google account. So if you're not in the above list, just get someone in the above list to add your google account. Just visit http://www.google.com/analytics/ to log in and view the data. It'll be a day or two before we see much of anything. -David -- Erik B. Craig
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4023) Provide Column Names in the Database Table View of the Admin Console
Provide Column Names in the Database Table View of the Admin Console Key: GERONIMO-4023 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4023 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: console, databases Affects Versions: 2.1.1 Environment: Windows XP SP2, Geronimo 2.1.1 Reporter: Cedric Hurst Priority: Minor In the database table view of the Admin Console, it might be worth adding some column headers in specifying that the first column correlates to the SCHEMA and the second column correlates to the table name. This might avoid confusion for databases where tables exist in multiple schemas. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
