[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4849:
--
Attachment: (was: monitoring_jmx.patch)
Such warning will be shown after deleted a remote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4849:
--
Attachment: monitoring_jmx.patch
Such warning will be shown after deleted a remote monitoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4863:
--
Attachment: (was: monitoring.patch)
no other graphs can be chosen when I click Modify this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4854:
--
Attachment: (was: monitoring.patch)
The protocol option will be reset after testing connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4863:
--
Attachment: monitoring.patch
no other graphs can be chosen when I click Modify this view of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4854:
--
Attachment: monitoring.patch
The protocol option will be reset after testing connection when
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false. So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.
When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly easily
without breaking the monitoring.
Does anyone have any other comments ?
On Mon, Sep
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/
[image: [DIR]] 2.0/
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/
14-Sep-2009 01:00- Automated test builds
[image: [DIR]] 2.1/
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754848#action_12754848
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4849:
---
1, I noticed you only added mrc.dispose()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754849#action_12754849
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4849:
---
Does 21 branch have the same problem ?
Geronimo Revision: 814499 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-4854.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.5
Assignee: Shawn Jiang
Patch
plugin Apache Geronimo-Apache Directory Server Plugin 1.0 LDAPdoesn't
exist in http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.2
-
Key:
Hi
In the LoginModuleGBean, there is an attribute named loginDomainName, I
went through the codes, just found that while the WrappingLoginModule is
turned on, those domainNames are used in the Subject as DomainPrincipal.
Except for this, is there any use for those loginDomainNames ? And, I did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754861#action_12754861
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4790:
Hi David, My account has been created finally..
mrc.dispose() is used to close jmx connection, I have check all the code
used mrc to ensure every possible jmx connection is closed.
I create the patch from branch 2.2 and it seems that 2.1 has not been tested
according to the bug description.
-Siqi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Shawn Jiang
Then we would also need to change the default option when creating a server
to monitor in the monitoring console. Current default is EJB.
-Jack
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false.
Unable creating a new JMS Resource Group via For another JMS provider...
under IE
Key: GERONIMO-4873
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4873
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754894#action_12754894
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4647:
This has been applied to tomcat trunk, so
Hi,
When build g2.2 branch plugins/connector, there is an error :
Missing:
--
1)
org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-connector:jar:tests:2.1.3-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file
Yes, I also met this, Shawn has pointed that these days looks like the
branch 22 are not built autoly.
Might be the reason..
-Rex
2009/9/14 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Hi,
When build g2.2 branch plugins/connector, there is an error :
Missing:
--
1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan resolved GERONIMO-4798.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Commit changes to 2.2 At revision: 814548 and trunk At
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I also met this, Shawn has pointed that these days looks like the
branch 22 are not built autoly.
Might be the reason..
David Jencks is releasing txmanager 2.1.3. After that,upgrading the
dependency to
On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:34 PM, Ellen Tang wrote:
Hi,
I am a technical writer. I would like to apply for the editor access
for geronimo related docs.
Hi Ellen,
That would be great! To insure that our documentation is appropriately
Apache Licensed, we require an ICLA to be on file, before
Geronimo Revision: 814623 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 813529 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914/unit-test-reports
Is there an approximate date of Geronimo 2.2 release ? I remembered that
last time, what I got is in the early October.
Thanks !
2009/9/14 Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com
I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a
JIRA...
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM,
Hi Kevan, I think Ellen has filed her ICLA cause I saw her name was in
unlisted CLA group with name Tang Lei.
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
Please help to confirm.
Thanks alot.
Jeff Chi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 13,
+1
Jarek
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:58 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars.
I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and connector
code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false. So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring
agent.
When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly
easily without breaking the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755024#action_12755024
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4836:
Yes, this class is configurable in the xml file, we
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false. So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.
When the users do not need
On Sep 14, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller
kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false. So that the user will use JMX as
+1
david jencks
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for
inclusion in g. 2.2.
Release artifacts staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-003/
Site staged here:
+1
david jencks
On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:16 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've built a release candidate for the jacc spec jar:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-002/
Site is staged here:
+1
david jencks
On Sep 13, 2009, at 12:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars.
I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and
connector code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2:
On Sep 13, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
Can we also include the fix for XBEAN-122? It fixes important
problems in
the naming module.
According to JIRA this was committed back in march. Can you verify
this and set the Fix version in the jira issue if appropriate?
thanks
david
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
-Donald
Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a
testing on it.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi
In the LoginModuleGBean, there is an attribute named
loginDomainName, I went through the codes, just found that while the
WrappingLoginModule is turned on, those domainNames are used in the
Subject as DomainPrincipal. Except for this, is
+1
Jarek
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:16 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've built a release candidate for the jacc spec jar:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-002/
Site is staged here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755004#action_12755004
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-4871:
---
Works for me on Ubuntu (with Sun Java 5).
Hope someone could look into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222. It's an important
reliability issue about db connectivity.
Good to see that happen :-)
I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
-Donald
Forrest Xia wrote:
I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2
samples plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.
I will post my
I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 samples
plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.
I will post my results here soon.
+1
Jarek
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:08 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for inclusion
in g. 2.2.
Release artifacts staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-003/
Site staged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755016#action_12755016
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4871:
That's good, I guess, but strange. I'm
+1
Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars.
I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and
connector code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-012/
+1
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars.
I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and connector
code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2:
+1
source, build, and binaries all look good
--kevan
On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for
inclusion in g. 2.2.
Release artifacts staged here:
Geronimo Revision: 814753 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914/unit-test-reports
Guillaume,
Your PGP key is missing from the Geronimo KEYS file --
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
--kevan
On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project.
I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the
Dave,
It looks like the md5 and sha1 checksums are bad on all of your
release votes. I'm now -1 until resolved.
--kevan
On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for
inclusion in g. 2.2.
Release artifacts staged here:
Geronimo Revision: 814776 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090914/unit-test
The license file contains a W3C license for XMLSchema.dtd. However,
the generated jar file does not contain the license. AFAICT, there's
no need for this license. Am I missing something?
--kevan
On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:16 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've built a release candidate for the jacc
The automated TCK tests are failing when building the geronimo server from
the branches/2.2 source with a missing artifact error[1].
Missing: --
1)
org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-connector:jar:tests:2.1.3-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
The automated TCK tests are failing when building the geronimo
server from the branches/2.2 source with a missing artifact error[1].
This was caused by the tests jar problem that David recently fixed.
I've deployed a fixed version of
Changing my vote to -1 until the checksum issues are resolved.
--kevan
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
+1
Source, build, and generated binaries look good.
There's a problem with the staging and site links in your note,
however. The text of the links is correct. However,
Added.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 20:37, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Guillaume,
Your PGP key is missing from the Geronimo KEYS file --
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
--kevan
On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded another 1.0.0
For interest sake, how would you use this to implement the below?
If you have a doc specifying this, can you send me the link. This
explanation made it sound interesting, as I myself have wondered about
the WrappingLoginModule.
Q
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:42 PM, David Jencks
Quintin Beukes-2 wrote:
They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
success.
I see it that biggest problem with Geronimo is lack of good
This turned out to be because I was inadvertently using maven 2.2 for
these releases, which has a problem with uploading files twice to
nexus, and calculating the checksum on the doubled file.
John Casey regenerated the checksums on all the staging repos for me.
I checked a couple and
On Sep 14, 2009, at 5:41 PM, David Jencks wrote:
This turned out to be because I was inadvertently using maven 2.2
for these releases, which has a problem with uploading files twice
to nexus, and calculating the checksum on the doubled file.
Good to know.
John Casey regenerated the
Spot check of checksums looks good. Here's my +1. Thanks David!
--kevan
On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for
inclusion in g. 2.2.
Release artifacts staged here:
+1
--kevan
On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project.
I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread.
The staging repository is available at:
+1
--kevan
On Sep 13, 2009, at 3:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars.
I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and
connector code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755298#action_12755298
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4830:
rev814960
submit the new debug-views codes and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755298#action_12755298
]
Rex Wang edited comment on GERONIMO-4830 at 9/14/09 6:42 PM:
-
Yes, I agree that documentation is really important to the success of
Geronimo.
We have lots of changes in terms of security, web container integration
mechanism as well as GEP improvements for G2.2, and we know some of
information are not well documented yet. For the current status of G2.2 doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jack Cai updated GERONIMO-4874:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-4874.patch
I use the nio buffers and charset decoders to do the text scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755301#action_12755301
]
Jack Cai commented on GERONIMO-4874:
Forgot to mention, the below two files can be
I think this is the page that David mentioned:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/configuring-login-modules.html
Jeff C
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Quintin Beukes quin...@skywalk.co.zawrote:
For interest sake, how would you use this to implement the below?
If you have a doc specifying
Geronimo Revision: 814941 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914/build-2000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090914
[INFO] BUILD
I finished the patch for the console filter to improve its performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874
Hopefully someone could review it...
-Jack
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods
edit button shows under Created label when i create a new view
-
Key: GERONIMO-4875
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4875
Project: Geronimo
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755320#action_12755320
]
Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-261:
I'm not quite clear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4830.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
rev814983 for trunk
Commit new debug-view
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755325#action_12755325
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4831:
rev 814985
remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4831.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
stop building dojo-0.4.3 from ext
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4831:
---
Description: cause we don't need dojo-legacy ever. (was: we don't need
dojo-legacy that with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755336#action_12755336
]
viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-4855:
First, pls add distributable element to your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rodger Zhang updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-456:
--
Attachment: updated_security_realm.patch
replace the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755349#action_12755349
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4832:
rev814992 for branch 2.2
Modify EJB portlets
java.lang.Exception when I shutdown the server
-
Key: GERONIMO-4876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4876
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4832.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.2
rev 814996 for trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755351#action_12755351
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4790:
All the sub tasks have been resolved. Will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4854.
--
The protocol option will be reset after testing connection when addint server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755355#action_12755355
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4876:
---
can't recreate this, please be more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755362#action_12755362
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4855:
Thanks Viola for pointing out this, so it looks
89 matches
Mail list logo
