[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5525) Geronimo launch failed for Multiple Geronimo Instances

Geronimo launch failed for Multiple Geronimo Instances --- Key: GERONIMO-5525 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5525 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 984646

Geronimo Revision: 984646 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100812/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5495) Upgrade the geronimo-openejb-2.0.xsd file for new persistence schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated GERONIMO-5495: --- Attachment: G-5495.patch Pls review it, thanks in advance! Here i changed openejb

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984661

Geronimo Revision: 984661 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5526) install-library command does not recognize the relative path

install-library command does not recognize the relative path Key: GERONIMO-5526 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5526 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5527) It's better to refresh the corresponding bundle in cache automatically when a geronimo module get modified.

It's better to refresh the corresponding bundle in cache automatically when a geronimo module get modified. --- Key: GERONIMO-5527 URL:

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

I can't think of any reason why the 72-hour wait needs to be conditined. Rick On 8/11/2010 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here --

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5495) Upgrade the geronimo-openejb-2.0.xsd file for new persistence schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu reassigned GERONIMO-5495: -- Assignee: Ivan (was: viola.lu) pls help apply it ,thanks in advance! Upgrade the

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 984728

Geronimo Revision: 984728 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] maven-plugins 1.1 for Geronimo Eclipse Plugin (2nd try)

+1 Source, signature/checksums, build, all look good. Note that the NOTICE file is out-of-date: = == NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

I agree on dropping the waiting period. On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here --

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

I agree too! Lin On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK The

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984753

Geronimo Revision: 984753 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 984875

Geronimo Revision: 984875 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812/unit-test-reports

Re: svn commit: r958821 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/plugins: client/client-deployer/src/main/plan/ j2ee/j2ee-deployer/src/main/plan/ openjpa2/geronimo-persistence-jpa20-builder/src/main/java/org/apa

Hi Jarek, I could be very wrong :-) but I think I mis-wrote in the commit description. It looks to me as if when we build the refs we do in fact look first in the module, then in parents, but when we look for persistence units to deploy them we only look in the current module. Before this

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984915

Geronimo Revision: 984915 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 985045

Geronimo Revision: 985045 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 985058

Geronimo Revision: 985058 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100812 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [VOTE] maven-plugins 1.1 for Geronimo Eclipse Plugin (2nd try)

Thanks, Kevan! Hope other PMC members can take a look at this. 2010/8/12 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com +1 Source, signature/checksums, build, all look good. Note that the NOTICE file is out-of-date: = ==