Hi devs,
any news on the availability?
Thanks
Jean-Louis
2011/7/7 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I'm still not sure about the instructions, but releasing from the 2.2
branch should be fine. I only want to review the trunk code.
also, replying to a different message, if you run
failed for me.
add
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.xbean/groupId
artifactIdxbean-bundleutils/artifactId
/dependency
can resolve this.
2011/7/12 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
The build works for me anyone else seeing problems?
thanks
david jencks
I've reviewed the code, it's better and more concise than I did[?], thank you
very much, Jarek.
When I test the new feature, I find a problem that when restart the eclipse
and modify the bundle's symbolic name or version, then publish the bundle to
the server, the server would not remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan reassigned GERONIMO-5904:
--
Assignee: Ivan (was: Shenghao Fang)
Reference bound in JNDI is not dereferenced properly when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063763#comment-13063763
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5904:
Hi, David, here is some background info for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063765#comment-13063765
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5904:
Commit the patch to trunk at rev.1145482. Thanks, Fang
Geronimo Revision: 1145394 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110712/build-2000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110712
[INFO] BUILD
FYI
If something fails in Geronimo, please lemme know.
Jean-Louis
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/7/12
Subject: Re: EntityManager not closed when a stateful is destroyed
To: d...@openejb.apache.org
OK, reverted changes yesterday
On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The build works for me anyone else seeing problems?
Builds fine for me, also.
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Forrest Xia reassigned GERONIMO-6063:
-
Assignee: Forrest Xia
Yoko 1.2-SNAPSHOT
-
Key:
I'm going to release geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec because jaxb bundle and
woodstox bundle release also depend on this spec.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Another dependent package is also required to release
first, geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec
2011/6/28 Ivan
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1
This is a bug fix release that only includes one fix for GERONIMO-5848
The components up for vote are:
1, mvn install build is OK
2, mvn rat:check result is clean.
Here is my own +1.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1
This is a bug fix release that only includes one fix for GERONIMO-5848
The components up for vote
Canceling this vote since the staging repo contains other bundle that I
don't want to release now.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1
This is a bug fix release that only includes one fix for GERONIMO-5848
The
cancelled. Will clean up the staging and then init the vote again.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1
This is a bug fix release that only includes one fix for GERONIMO-5848
The components up for vote are:
Hi, Dev:
I met a problem when deploy an ear which packages an ejb, application
client, web app. And the EJB is in the class-path of app client module
manifest, but Appclientmodulebuilder class doesn't add this class-path of
manifest to module's LinkedHashSetString classpath, So it's not in the
Yes, it is by design. App client modules should not have access to web
modules, ejb modules and other app client modules in the same ear package.
2011/7/12 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Hi, Dev:
I met a problem when deploy an ear which packages an ejb, application
client, web app. And the EJB
per java ee 6 spec: EE.8.3.3 Application Client Container Class Loading
Requirements
Components in the application client container must not have access to the
following classes and resources, *unless such classes or resources are
covered by
one of the rules above.*
If the ejb jar is in the
Hmm, I double checked the spec, so which rule should cover this request ?
---
• The Java EE API classes specified in Table EE.6-1 for the containers other
than
the application client container.
• Any installed libraries available in the application server.
• Other classes or resources contained
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
Hi All,
I think we come to a point to determine whether to release YOKO 1.2 for G 3.0
release.
Since rest of YOKO related tck failures are due to RI' problem we think, I
would think we could release YOKO 1.2 now.
If any objection,
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848
The components up for vote are:
Components in the application client container must have access to the
following
classes and resources.
• The content of the application client jar file.
• The transitive closure of any libraries referenced by the above jar file
(as spec-
ified in Section EE.8.2, “Library Support”).
On Tue, Jul
1, mvn install build is OK
2, mvn rat:check result is clean.
Again, Here is my own +1.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-5848
From the word of 'library', I do not think that ejb module is belong to this
scope.
2011/7/12 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Components in the application client container must have access to the
following
classes and resources.
• The content of the application client jar file.
• The
[VOTE] release YOKO 1.2 - 1st attempt.
This is a bug fixes release for Java EE 6 compliance:
The fixes in this release are:
YOKO-431 Classloader issue when initializing a corba skeleton for EJB object
YOKO-433 YOKO chunking logic does not set the the chunk flag to false when
the valuetype tag is
1. mvn test, all passed
2. mvn install, all succeed
3. mvn rat:check, except those auto-generated CORBA spec classes and OMG
copyright files, all of the other files are passed!
So, My +1
Forrest
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE] release YOKO 1.2 -
Rotation and appending of console output when Geronimo is run a windows service
---
Key: GERONIMO-6073
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6073
Project:
Hi, devs, I just uploaded a patch for
AXIS2-5023https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-5023.
If possible, please help to review it first, as I am not quite confident for
the changes for this jira, although it seems to work now.
Thanks.
2011/7/12 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
OK, I forget to reply
Build and rat check seems OK for me
+1
Forrest
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
1, mvn install build is OK
2, mvn rat:check result is clean.
Again, Here is my own +1.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
[VOTE]
build OK for me.
+ 1 if interop TCK 100% pass
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
1. mvn test, all passed
2. mvn install, all succeed
3. mvn rat:check, except those auto-generated CORBA spec classes and OMG
copyright files, all of the other files are
+1
2011/7/13 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
Build and rat check seems OK for me
+1
Forrest
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
1, mvn install build is OK
2, mvn rat:check result is clean.
Again, Here is my own +1.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:18
Looks good with one exception.
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 2011.
Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Neither
of
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks good with one exception.
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be
2011.
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good with one exception.
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:
Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation
Not a hard
Same about the year in the NOTICE file. So, would like to see that updated.
The source, signatures/checksums, LICENSE/NOTICE file looks good. I'm running a
build, now. Will let you know if I see any problems. I keep building while a
Geronimo server is running. IIRC, the server interferes with
OK, for this spec, let's leave it as is. I'll update the remaining
bundles before releasing them.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller
36 matches
Mail list logo
