> On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> I think i get your point of view. Ill note that i didnt participate in this
> vote but my POV is that we were only voting on item 1, retire the server.
>
> The fact that new components are coming in is a different
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> This 'implied' 3rd block was actually never implied nor up for discussion.
> Not quite sure what I did word wrong to give you that impression.
> But rest ensurred that it was never intended that way!
>> Paraphrasing,
On Sep 8, 2017 5:10 PM, "David Blevins" wrote:
Moving the thread over here so we’re all on the same page.
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On
This 'implied' 3rd block was actually never implied nor up for discussion.
Not quite sure what I did word wrong to give you that impression.
But rest ensurred that it was never intended that way!
Why should we try to block anyone else from creating reusable components?
What you might mean is
That was my understanding too.
Especially, the initial vote email says
"Note that this vote is only about the Geroniom Server but NOT about the
shared components.
Those components will be further maintained - or moved to a different
project later."
Which to me goes against your point #3.
Moving the thread over here so we’re all on the same page.
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM David Blevins wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
>
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > +1 for going forward
> >
> > Note that I also totally understand Davids concerns about the public
> perception about Geronimo and that
Le 8 sept. 2017 08:45, "David Blevins" a écrit :
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> +1 for going forward
>
> Note that I also totally understand Davids concerns about the public
perception about Geronimo and that people still
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> +1 for going forward
>
> Note that I also totally understand Davids concerns about the public
> perception about Geronimo and that people still think we talk about the
> G-Server.
> To mitigate this problem I pushed