I got the wrong version number in the subject, but these would be the links:
-
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-M1
-
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0-M1/
-David
> On May 23, 2022, at 11:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> Side note: referencing tag+hash + dist (dev) area (only thing we vote
> against) would be neat for future votes since we dont vote on a staging repo.
>
> Anyway thanks for doing it, really great to see you back ;)
>
> PS: dont forget jira and site updates, we missed it by the past and hurts way
> later when we need to catch up.
>
> Le lun. 23 mai 2022 à 18:15, David Blevins a écrit :
> Vote passes with 6 +1s (4 binding)
>
> As noted in the other vote I didn't propose a final as we haven't yet run the
> full set of TCK tests for this library, specifically the signature tests. In
> particular, the signature tests verify all the classes and method signatures
> match the expected set and there are no additions/changes, etc. These are
> separate from the com.sun.ts.tests.javamail tests.
>
> In the past we would always ensure these tests before releasing.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > On May 14, 2022, at 2:27 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > If I was thinking ahead I'd have put these both in the same staging repo
> > and vote :)
> >
> > Staging Maven repository:
> >
> > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
> >
> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
> > contributor Richard Zowalla and a change from "javamail" to simply "mail"
> >
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > -David
> >
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature