rmannibucau commented on issue #1: fix NPE when No issuer for kid (no mapping
and/or default issuer)
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/1#issuecomment-385185691
Thanks for checking!
This is an automated
rdebusscher closed pull request #1: fix NPE when No issuer for kid (no mapping
and/or default issuer)
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/1
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of
rdebusscher commented on issue #1: fix NPE when No issuer for kid (no mapping
and/or default issuer)
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/1#issuecomment-385178400
issue already solved by supporting multiple default issuers as done in
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse
Microprofile 1.1 and minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#discussion_r192568355
##
File path: geronimo-jwt-auth-impl/src/test/resources/tck.xml
##
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse
Microprofile 1.1 and minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#discussion_r192568355
##
File path: geronimo-jwt-auth-impl/src/test/resources/tck.xml
##
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse
Microprofile 1.1 and minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#discussion_r192568348
##
File path:
asfgit closed pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse Microprofile 1.1 and minor
things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
jeanouii opened a new pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse Microprofile 1.1 and
minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse
Microprofile 1.1 and minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#discussion_r192568348
##
File path:
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #2: Upgrade to Eclipse
Microprofile 1.1 and minor things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#discussion_r192568355
##
File path: geronimo-jwt-auth-impl/src/test/resources/tck.xml
##
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@
jeanouii commented on issue #2: Upgrade to Eclipse Microprofile 1.1 and minor
things
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/2#issuecomment-394116291
Right.
I’ll remove the toString too
Le samedi 2 juin 2018, Romain Manni-Bucau a
écrit :
> *@rmannibucau*
jeanouii closed pull request #1: Remove JCS mentions from the project
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jcache-simple/pull/1
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a
jeanouii opened a new pull request #1: Remove JCS mentions from the project
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jcache-simple/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
rdebusscher opened a new pull request #1: fix NPE when No issuer for kid (no
mapping and/or default issuer)
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
diuis opened a new pull request #1: jdk9+ compilation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/1
Enabled java 9+ compilation (with the introduction of activation api at
runtime scope).
Removed already defined maven plugin versions (some was outdated).
Updated
diuis opened a new pull request #2: fix for the empty ref attribute of
RequestBody annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/2
When a jax-rs method parameter is annotated in this way, without the ref
attribute:
```
public AssetViewModel
diuis commented on issue #2: fix for the empty ref attribute of RequestBody
annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/2#issuecomment-409651754
@rmannibucau please take a look at this pr
This is an
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: fix for the empty ref attribute of
RequestBody annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/2#issuecomment-409700017
Hi @diuis
Do you mind adding a test? Updated a oot of these issues earlier today and
wonder if it was missed.
diuis commented on issue #2: fix for the empty ref attribute of RequestBody
annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/2#issuecomment-409866560
Hi @rmannibucau , your abd695bed67d082146148c55b5a295749f113afa commit fixed
the RequestBody empty ref bug:
```
if
diuis closed pull request #2: fix for the empty ref attribute of RequestBody
annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/2
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #1: jdk9+ compilation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/1#discussion_r205850019
##
File path: pom.xml
##
@@ -169,6 +170,13 @@
true
+
+javax.activation
+
radcortez closed pull request #1: Fix issue with ClassConverter loading Class
when Class is not in the same Classloader.
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/1
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414912784
If you scan the target/classes folder+check mvn deps, you are able
(theorically for now since I dont know if a plugin does it) to generate
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414804419
If you wish to change to the maven-bundle-plugin we can do it, I just like
the bnd plugin more personally, but that's not a worthy issue to block over.
rmannibucau edited a comment on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414806123
Here is how i see it: most of imports, service loader stuff, versions, etc
is generable so we should reduce our maintenance by generating it. Not
rotty3000 opened a new pull request #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5
Signed-off-by: Raymond Auge
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414806123
Here is how i see it: most of imports, service loader stuff, versions, etc
is generable so we should reduce our maintenance by generating it. Not sure
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414808157
for the versions, sure this was just showing the mechanics, not the final
PR, certainly I planned to unify the data from mvn.
For the spi
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414806748
so I am more clear, are you talking about the versions that you see in the
bnd file?
This
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414808932
OH I remembered the nice thing about the bnd-maven-plugin is that we don't
have to use `bundle` :( it just uses normal packaging
`jar`.
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414820686
updated using `maven-bundle-plugin` and some mvn properties.
This is an automated message
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-414807157
Yes, spec ones are extractible from mvn, but also all the spi registration
etc is doable with static analyzis
rotty3000 edited a comment on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-415051435
There's one part of this that could be made much more trivial if we change
the compile dependencies to point to the upcoming geronimo specs. These
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-415051773
makes sense :+1:
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
rotty3000 commented on issue #5: [MP-Config] osgi support
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/5#issuecomment-415051435
There's one part of this that could be made much more trivial if we change
the compile dependencies to point to the upcoming geronimo specs. These will
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417464878
I'm not really expecting this for merge. I'm more looking for help to
resolve the failing test. Maybe someone can fetch the branch and debug
rotty3000 opened a new pull request #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1
I'm having an issue with this TCK test so I replicated it without the
container. But I'm not sure what's going wrong. I think the algorithm might be
off.
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417671342
ok right, I think this test is specifically checking that.
This is an
jgallimore opened a new pull request #3: Additional principal tests to
highlight potential OWB issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/3
Adds an additional test to ensure different requests with different tokens
with different upn claims are correctly injected.
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417678990
.. wish I had the knowledge to implement that. I think it's the only failing
thing in this upgrade :(
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin,
update some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455532866
@deki I'm fine like that but thought I would ask you if you want to
unmarshall the json to check some of its shape
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin,
update some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455499337
@deki Hmm, i dont see where is the test validating the output of the invoker?
deki opened a new pull request #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455533794
@deki small unit test please :angel: ? (no need to use CDI if you don't
want, a plain se test of the processor is more
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some
versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455491054
@rmannibucau I've just resolved conflicts, would be great if you could merge
it.
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some
versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455531354
@rmannibucau of course, you are right. I've added a script for that.
deki commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455863010
I cannot run unittests from IDE:
```
java.lang.ClassCastException: Cannot cast sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader
to
asfgit merged pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update
some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin,
update some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455849587
Oki, created GERONIMO-6684 and GERONIMO-6685 for this PR and applied it.
rmannibucau commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455868959
@deki while tck run yes (as the name implies it shouldnt even exist ;)). You
can also not use arquillian at all which is
deki commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455865486
I've added a testcase. Will extend that with other PRs along with the fixes
for missing stuff.
Regarding
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some
versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455778387
@rmannibucau yeah that's easy by using a validator.
```
com.reprezen.kaizen.oasparser.OpenApi3Parser parser = new
deki opened a new pull request #8: WIP: [GERONIMO-6689] use default for default
responses
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/8
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #8: [WIP] [GERONIMO-6689] use default for
default responses
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/8#issuecomment-456028828
Applied but I kept the "put" to keep the http status
asfgit merged pull request #8: [WIP] [GERONIMO-6689] use default for default
responses
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/8
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
deki commented on issue #8: [WIP] [GERONIMO-6689] use default for default
responses
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/8#issuecomment-456062329
Thanks for merging, but I don't think this is correct. Please see my comment
in JIRA:
rmannibucau commented on issue #8: [WIP] [GERONIMO-6689] use default for
default responses
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/8#issuecomment-456077746
Commented as well, think we are fine this way to not break consumers.
Anything against that in the spec?
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: Additional principal tests to highlight
potential OWB issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/3#issuecomment-456322216
Hey Jon, what's the status of that PR? think it is "solved", no?
jgallimore commented on issue #3: Additional principal tests to highlight
potential OWB issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/3#issuecomment-456328057
I'm ok to close. Thanks for your help.
This is an
jgallimore closed pull request #3: Additional principal tests to highlight
potential OWB issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
deki commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455975449
Ok added a check as seperate PR
This is an automated message
deki opened a new pull request #7: fix ClassCastException when running tests
from IntelliJ IDEA
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/7
As discussed in #6 this is fix to run tests from IntelliJ IDEA. Currently
it's not possible to run any tests, even if Arquillian or TCK
asfgit merged pull request #7: fix ClassCastException when running tests from
IntelliJ IDEA
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/7
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455979091
Applied, :+1:
This is an automated message from the
asfgit merged pull request #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rmannibucau commented on issue #1: jdk9+ compilation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/1#issuecomment-455980836
FYI cxf 3.3.0 will not require activation/jaxb so should be fine when we'll
upgrade meecrowave with cxf 3.3.0
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: Use JAX-RS 2.1 annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/5#issuecomment-455983512
Hi @opeti, thanks for the patch.
I wonder what triggers this patch? Keeping the impl working with JAX-RS 2.0
is nice for now IMHO (jaxrs is
rmannibucau commented on issue #5: Use JAX-RS 2.1 annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/5#issuecomment-456581322
Hmm the fallback was using @HttpMethod to grab verb extension, did you check
if the api was missing it or it was a bug in that area in the annotation
rmannibucau commented on issue #10: GERONIMO-6690 - OpenAPI
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when @Path parent has only "/".
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/10#issuecomment-456842102
@radcortez oops, just pushed almost the same fix since you didnt affect
yourself in
radcortez commented on issue #10: GERONIMO-6690 - OpenAPI
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when @Path parent has only "/".
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/10#issuecomment-456843737
@rmannibucau No worries. Unfortunately, I don't seem to have permissions to
assign
radcortez closed pull request #10: GERONIMO-6690 - OpenAPI
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when @Path parent has only "/".
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/10
This is an automated message from the Apache
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin,
update some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455808498
Was more thinking reusing our own code, potentially with a validate new
service if you feel it can be reusable ;) -
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some
versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455810868
Well good ideas for the future, I suggest to merge this one and enhance it
later as I'd like to focus on improving other
deki commented on issue #6: [GERONIMO-6683] fixed missing mapping for
Parameter.In
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/6#issuecomment-455810912
I'll create a test.
This is an automated message from the
deki opened a new pull request #9: update apache parent to 21
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/9
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub
deki opened a new pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin,
update some versions
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442826327
> It will change the return type from Metric to Object and won't work for
other methods that are using it.
I'm pretty
ivanjunckes commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442816821
I actually now get it, but adding map there doesn't work:
return ofNullable(metricRegistry.getMetrics().get(name))
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442837720
To be concrete, here is the proposal:
diff --git
ivanjunckes commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442818000
When you say a server or an endpoint are not necessary, how would you do it?
rmannibucau commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-442836211
@rotty3000 hello Raymond, think we fixed that, can you confirm when you have
a few sec?
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - application/json doesn't
return correct payload
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-443199512
Applied, thanks a lot Ivan
This is an automated
asfgit closed pull request #2: GERONIMO-6658 - application/json doesn't return
correct payload
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-441321577
Point was more the null check can is already done later so a map(this::map)
is likely a better fix and would work for other usages
ivanjunckes commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-441299764
@rmannibucau it doesn't handle it properly. Gauge needs to go through map()
method to get the gauge value. singleEntry prepares it
ivanjunckes opened a new pull request #2: WIP - Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2
This is WIP as the TCK on TomEE is broken. So I can't be sure if the PR is a
100% ok.
This is an
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-441120104
If it helps singleEntry was supposed handling it properly
This is an
rmannibucau commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442598808
If you look the code of singleEntry (what you changed) you will see it just
misses a map on the metric otherwise it is exactly the
ivanjunckes commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442591418
I am not sure I get your reply @rmannibucau, I added some tests. Can you
review them?
Also, if you have an example of
ivanjunckes commented on issue #2: GERONIMO-6658 - WIP Fix bug with gauge json
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2#issuecomment-442656310
I will have a look tomorrow, no need to do it for me.
This is an
opeti opened a new pull request #5: Use JAX-RS 2.1 annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/5
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub
ivanjunckes opened a new pull request #4: GERONIMO-6670 - fixing text/html
issue and tests (snake dependency wa…
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4
…s not there for testing purposes)
This is an automated
cesarhernandezgt commented on issue #4: GERONIMO-6670 - fixing text/html issue
and tests (snake dependency wa…
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4#issuecomment-451559048
+1 build successfully locally.
This
rmannibucau commented on issue #4: GERONIMO-6670 - fixing text/html issue and
tests (snake dependency wa…
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4#issuecomment-451571369
It should be good on master.
However I will take the opportunity to put there some notes for later
struberg commented on issue #1: add a full configuraiton file for geronimo
opentracing
URL:
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-microprofile/pull/1#issuecomment-420672935
+1 for the PR
This is an automated message from the
akhabali opened a new pull request #1: add a full configuraiton file for
geronimo opentracing
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-microprofile/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
opeti commented on issue #5: Use JAX-RS 2.1 annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/5#issuecomment-456514084
Hello!
Well, I'm using PATCH operations in my api and since I use Resteasy and not
Apache CXF, I was not able to generate OpenAPI documentation
reta opened a new pull request #15: The AnnotationProcessor should consider
'@APIResponses' annotation
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/15
The Issue
---
The `AnnotationProcessor` only considers `@APIResponse` annotation whereas
the `@APIResponses` allows to
reta opened a new pull request #14: The AnnotationProcessor should be able to
deduct the parameter name from JAX-RS annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/14
The Issue
---
Often the `@Parameter` annotation is used to augment the JAX-RS annotations
with the
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #14: The AnnotationProcessor
should be able to deduct the parameter name from JAX-RS annotations
URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/14#discussion_r272884304
##
File path:
1 - 100 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
