on OpenJPA 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 after verifying that it
didn't create any TCK issues.
Joe
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
, I can spare some time to osgify the remaining ones (corba_3.0,
el_1.0, j2ee_deployment_1.1, jsp_2.1).
Anyway, I guess this may be useful at some point, so I will put them back in
trunk and osgify them now.
Rick
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http
not to release all of the
specs as a single release that way. Definitely something that needs to
be discussed on the dev list.
Rick
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've added the missing specs (but the corba one) in trunk.
I'm thinking we could create a branch, change all spec numbers to
their released
On Dec 4, 2007 8:57 PM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 2:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, this *is* the axis2 saaj 1.3 spec.
I've done that for two reasons:
* the spec jar becomes an osgi bundle (along with all the other specs)
Ok but we
Interesting. I did not even know there was one at the ASF.
I was using the sun one which is binary compatible with ASL.
On Dec 4, 2007 9:03 PM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 3:00 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We pull two specs from Axis2 so we would
,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
I've just fixed the alias for now.
On Dec 5, 2007 10:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I've had a look at GSHELL-60 and committed a fix for it so that the
remote part of gshell can be used in ServiceMix 4.0.
Lots of these changes are about adding constructors to classes
On Dec 7, 2007 1:36 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I wasn't aware the parent pom had been released yesterday:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/specs/1.3/
Did I miss something ?
I wasn't sure a vote was needed on the parent pom
/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3
The tag will be created at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
community did not have any committers that expressed an
interest in continuing work on these bindings. As such, only the code
would be moving to apache CXF.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
/geronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3
The tag will be created at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.3
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
, no no no no no...
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
critical to
the growth and success of GShell. So thanks again!
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
out and shake what your mother gave ya...
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
The vote is over with 4 +1s. Thank you!
I will proceeed with moving the jars and tags to their final location.
On Dec 18, 2007 6:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 - Release the jars
[ ] 0 - No opinion
[ ] -1 - Do not release the jars
We're voting on the following
/geronimo/components/txmanager/
branches/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.1/
Vote will be open for 72 hours and close on the 13th
[ ] +1 - Yes, release it
[ ] 0 - Hmm...
[ ] -1 - No, because...
Vote away!
-David
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog
.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release JPA 3.0 spec, v 1.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release JACC 1.1 spec, v 1.0.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
I have only released J2EE specs.
If there is any interest for commonj and jaspi, just tell me and i can do
that
quickly ;-)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
/http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release ws-metadata 2.0 spec, v 1.1.2
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0/
Note that this release depends on the SAAJ 1.3 spec which is being released
atm
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release jaxrpc 1.1 spec
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release jaas 1.3 spec
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/
Note: this release depens on the JTA 1.1 spec currently being voted.
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release j2ee connector 1.5 spec, v 2.0
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release EL 1.0 spec, v 1.0.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
, 2008 9:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/http
.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have only released J2EE specs.
If there is any interest for commonj and jaspi, just tell me and i can do
that
quickly ;-)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com
and vote:
[ ] +1 Release jaxr 1.0 spec
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release jta 1.1 spec, v 1.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
-1.1.1http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release annotation 1.0 spec, v 1.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
/http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release interceptor 3.0 spec, v 1.0.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release jms 1.1 spec, v 1.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release it
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 5:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JSP 2.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 5:18 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JPA 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 5:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JACC 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 5:04 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of EL 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JMS 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of EJB 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of Interceptor 3.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:19 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of annotations 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 3:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 3:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 3:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/
Repo
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 5:36 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of ws-metadata 2.0 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of J2EE Management 1.1 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 4:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector 1.5 spec for vote.
The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee
Btw, here's my +1
On Jan 29, 2008 3:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, actually, the subject is right, but the typo is in the body.
Let me rewrite it:
I've uploaded a release of SAAJ 1.3 spec for vote.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo
-19980720, I
believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
Other than the above, all looks good.
--kevan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I
believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
Other than the above, all looks good.
--kevan
Do you think we should cut a new release for this one ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
plugin.
I have serious doubts that the previous release were done with maven
(at least for the javadocs and source jars).
On Jan 31, 2008 8:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something we overlooked, previously
On Jan 31, 2008 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags
. It looks like we use
axis2-saaj-api for this currently. Is the plan to also switch Geronimo
over to this new spec jar?
Joe
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Well, actually, the subject is right, but the typo is in the body.
Let me rewrite it:
I've uploaded a release of SAAJ 1.3 spec
file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c
license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I
believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
Other than the above, all looks good.
--kevan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http
been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
files have been updated with w3c license.
Please double check and vote:
[ ] +1 Release the specs
[ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
On Feb 1, 2008 6:24 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos
The vote is cancelled.
On Feb 1, 2008 12:34 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags
for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to
close the votes and move the specs
to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that
this vote is ok).
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
On Feb 1, 2008 4:25 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
What do you mean by skipped version numbers and different formats ?
By format, I meant the new, non-standard tags/specs-1.4 destination.
By skipped version numbers
.
This vote passes with 8 +1 votes and no others. Note that I'm counting
Guillaume as a '+1', although he didn't explicitly state this.
I'll start distributing the binaries.
--kevan
On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Third try ...
Tags are here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
know about one of these and think it should stay please
reply. If you know it should go you can remove it, tell me to remove
it, or do nothing and I will in a few days.
thanks
david jencks
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
to delegate to one of these class before using
the standard behavior (the class would do nothing if not deployed in an OSGi
environment).
Has anyone any objection with such an enhancement in the specs jar ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, lots of these spec jars define factories (stax, saaj for example)
that use the META-INF/services/ discovery mechanism to find
:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In the past months, I've been working on making the specs jars from Geronimo
working in an OSGi environment.
All these jars have been published and work great :-)
However, lots of these spec jars define factories (stax, saaj for example)
that use the META-INF
the licenses of the JSRs they implement.
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
the bundle.
Imho, creating two different jars would confuse the users and be more
error prone.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In the past months, I've been working on making the specs jars from
having an OSGi specific thing
everywhere we use a factory from a j2ee spec :-(
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed
modules would be useful.
Another thought that flashed in my head is that in a buttoned down
environment getting service notifications might be easier than getting
access to every Bundle's class loader.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:30 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Cleaner
headers so that there is no confusion, but I don't really see
the benefit
of doing this. The added code would not run in a non-osgi environment, so
there is not much risk there.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
i don't mean legacy jars but legacy *code
implementation wrt to classloader constraints and would not allow the
jaxb 2.1 spec bundle to
see a service implementing jaxb 2.0. This would only work if we use
the versions on the packages,
but it may be worth the extra work.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http
Gshell is missing the following dependency:
org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT
Is there anyway it can be uploaded to a know snapshot repo so that
gshell can download it ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
-runtime-support-1.0-beta-4-20080419.173658-5.jar
71K downloaded
/snip
--jason
On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Gshell is missing the following dependency:
org.codehaus.groovy.maven:gmaven-plugin:pom:1.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT
Is there anyway it can be uploaded
+/releases
+/pluginRepository
+/pluginRepositories
distributionManagement
site
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
to
the correct values in the gshell parent pom.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kay, I understand... blame maven, thats what I do :-P
--jason
On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Right, not sure why it failed the first time. I'll remove
/project-config/1.3/project-config-1.3.pom
--jason
On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yeah, I've just added the plugin repo ;-)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
They are available here (and have been for many
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
spec and provider
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Don't release the javamail spec and provider
Rick
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
are for the OSGi enablement. Do we have a documented set of
instructions anywhere?
Rick
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
sure yet.
Anyways... making progress.
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
Doh, find the answer to my last question. The build was disable in
idea project did not show whisper. My bad!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just had a look at the current code, and I want to point a possible problem.
Bear with me if I misunderstood
version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog
);
}
-if (command instanceof CommandSupport) {
-((CommandSupport)command).setLocation(new
CommandLocationImpl(name));
-}
+command.setLocation(new CommandLocationImpl(name));
commands.put(name, command);
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I was supposing so.
However, it seems more natural, as the only place where the location
is set is when registering the command in the registry.
Maybe another way would be to say that the location has to be set on
the command in some way before
Looks good, I can work on fixing that if you want.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I suppose the PluginParser can set this, and thus avoid needing to make
it part of the Command intf.
--jason
On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote
introspection to detect signature changes between two
jars. Anyway, feedback welcome.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
a tck test and see if they are
ready to be released ?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them
on the project.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
);
}
}
io.err.flush();
}
}
}
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does one hook up GShell to use this stuff?
--jason
On Nov 7, 2008, at 4:22 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Over the past days, I've been working on a implementing
/spring/gshell-remote.xml
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, do you have org.apache.servicemix.kernel.gshell.core.sshd checked in
somewhere?
--jason
On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've just done a real quick prototype to plug
the gshell-remote bits :-)
I noticed you got some client goo in there too... how is that working?
--jason
On Nov 21, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yes, I've checked that in yesterday or so:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel/trunk/gshell/gshell-core/src/main
a release before that at google so that we can embed it.
Your thoughts?
--jason
On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've just done a real quick prototype to plug into smx kernel and I've
been able to log in into smx kernel using an ssh client and issue a
few commands
Yes, a vote is already going on to start the SSH subproject.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 22, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
snip
Bliss:Applications jason$ ssh localhost -p 8081
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
channel_by_id: 1: bad id
archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
-wisdom-gshell-wisdom-core-src-main-java-org-a...-tp21067909s134p21091483.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Open Source SOA
http
-command--gshell-wisdom-gshell-wisdom-core-src-main-java-org-apache-geronimo-gshell-wisdom-command--gshell-wisdom-gshell-wisdom-core-src-main-java-org-a...-tp21067909s134p21104706.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
. Put it in 1.1.2.1.1.1 has been delayed for a few weeks for minor changes. Jason Dillon wrote: On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done right now and all is good... but defs
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I don't really see why it should be in the 1.1 branch for the following reasons:First off... the plugin is to support G 1.1
I have to agree with you on this point. * it's a m2 plugin and can
to theirs, but in the
mean time, it should be easy enought o add the SNAPSHOT support to ourdownload code.Have you put in a Jira for that?Thanks, AaronOn 8/23/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw, the PluginInstallerGBean is unable to download snapshots artifacts. The problem is that when
401 - 500 of 2485 matches
Mail list logo
