xbean 3.0.1

2007-09-07 Thread Kevan Miller
Geronimo 2.0.1 is using XBean 3.0.1 versions of xbean-naming and xbean-finder and 3.1 version of xbean-reflect. Anybody recall why we're not using 3.1 versions of all xbean artifacts? If I knew, I've forgotten... ;-) --kevan

Re: xbean scm messages

2007-09-07 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Your email is not registered on that list. It was waiting on the moderator queue and I have just released it. Thanks. I'm still confused... ;-) Is there a unique SCM list for XBean? I'm guessing that there must be... I don't see David

Re: xbean scm messages

2007-09-07 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Your email is not registered on that list. It was waiting on the moderator queue and I have just released it. OK. I found the archive for xbean-scm (http://mail- archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-xbean-scm/). I've updated

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0

2007-09-07 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Does it mean we will need to spin a new RC? We can't release the binaries in their current state. So, yes. --kevan Vamsi On 9/7/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Tim, Apologies for my slow review of the Eclipse plugin

[DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0

2007-09-07 Thread Kevan Miller
Hey Tim, Apologies for my slow review of the Eclipse plugin. Reviewing the binary distribution, it looks like we are missing license and notice information for xpp3. There may be a few more notices missing, also. With your permission, I'll make updates to the license and notice files in

Re: Questions about geronimo-plugin.xml content

2007-09-06 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Sep 6, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 6, 2007, at 12:52 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think we should start using the maven-remote-resources- plugin. I will get to it eventually for sufficiently distant values

[DISCUSS] Default server log level

2007-09-11 Thread Kevan Miller
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging code. I'd like to see more structure and consistency in our logging. However, that's

Re: [DISCUSS] Default server log level

2007-09-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul McMahan wrote: On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near- term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul

Re: [DISCUSS] Default server log level

2007-09-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log file? Heh. Come on, read my mind... :-P I'm referring to the log FILE. I'm fine with our current CONSOLE behavior... --kevan

Re: removal of spring dependencies from cxf module

2007-09-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I think we have an acceptable solution for this whole CXF/Spring issue. First, CXF will continue to be configured with Spring as before. Second, all web applications will now get an automatic hidden-classes filtering for Spring classes and

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

2007-09-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can start working towards an official release of the tool. Does this require a Vote first or does

Re: svn commit: r573772 - in /tomcat: sandbox/gdev6x/ trunk/

2007-09-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 9/8/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I raised a concern about moving trunk to sandbox since it's the only branch that contains the annotation support needed by Geronimo. A committer responded that he will think about

Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk

2007-09-13 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 13, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'm converting all of the assemblies tonight, should be done in another hour or so. But, currently server/trunk is not building due to: snip [INFO] Compiling 18 source files to /Users/jason/ws/geronimo/server/

Re: svn commit: r574770 - in /geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.0.0: ./ plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model.edit/ plugins/org.apache.geronimo.deployment.model/ plugins/org.apache.ge

2007-09-13 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Lin Sun wrote: I think we also need to update the license in the feature.properties file for each of the feature we provide. Right now, I only saw ASL 2.0 there. The license in the feature.properties file

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-13 Thread Kevan Miller
Apologies for such a late response. This thread came out while I was on vacation and got buried by a lot of other things... This is a good list. Comments, below. On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:12 PM, David Jencks wrote: Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to

Re: Problem with referencing to beans from other ejb-jars

2007-09-13 Thread Kevan Miller
I thought I'd take the opportunity to send some love David B's way... I think it's great the way he's been addressing these user questions and documenting in the Wiki. I hope we can get this stuff organized so that users can find this information in a reasonable manner... --kevan On Sep

[DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-14 Thread Kevan Miller
All, I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time, I think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be able to make use of released versions of OpenJPA, Axis2, and hopefully OpenEjb,

Re: svn commit: r574770 - in /geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/2.0.0:

2007-09-14 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 14, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi Lin/Kevan, do you all feel this change is a show-stopped for RC2 ?? If so, I'll cancel the vote and start another one for RC3. Please advise. Thanks. Hey Tim, From a binary perspective, things are fine. However, if the installation

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-14 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Ugh... I had a feeling that this filtering will cause problems for someone. Anyway, in general I think moving the hidden-classes filter to the CXF deployer is a better solution (to keep it all together and assuming it has the same effect as when

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
I'm moving this to the '[DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release Plan' mail thread. --kevan

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by 9/21. I have a question for the team about that. I would like to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since that new release contains several bug fixes,

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On 9/17/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking of versions I think we should go to openjpa 1.0.0 the trunk build has been broken for a bit since the -r* snapshot openejb was using seems to have disappeared. Hmm. A while back, I moved branches/2.0 and trunk to OpenJPA

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
Moved from another mail thread... On 9/17/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting to wonder what the goal for 2.0.2 is. I kinda thought that a x.y.z where z 0 was a bugfix-only release of x.y.z-1 but I think some new features are going into 2.0.2... IIUC Vamsi is applying an

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-18 Thread Kevan Miller
I have not tested, but source and binaries look good... +1 --kevan

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-20 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Also, the changes in txmanager aren't enough to warrant another components release. The txmanager change was only to fix a misspelling in an exception message... Ya. However, there was a Transaction Recovery jira opened. I'm going to

Re: automatic builds with tests

2007-09-20 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Right. We have talked about this before and the majority opinion was to have a separate subject line. I have a gmail reader, but then again it's not about how I want it. I'll gladly put whatever the majority of the community decides. Start

Re: OSGifying org.apache.geronimo.specs

2007-09-21 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I guess given that no framework support it and that nobody uses this jar yet, I will just defer ;-) Many thanks for this explanation. There isn't a current release of the commonj spec. We only released commonj when we released all specs

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-21 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Will we have a released version of MyFaces 1.2.1? I believe we do not want to include any SNAPSHOT versions as dependencies in our releases. We can request a release when it is

Re: svn commit: r578231 - /geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1/

2007-09-21 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Kevan, This should be created from rev 563889. I had one commit to the branch in rev 577161 (just correcting a typo) post what was used in 2.0.1. Though I had sent an e-mail earlier to the dev-list about creating this tag I

LinuxWorld Open Solutions Conference 2007 in Tokyo

2007-09-24 Thread Kevan Miller
All, I'm going to be giving a Geronimo talk at the LinuxWorld Open Solutions Conference, in Tokyo on Thursday of this week. The talk is from 11:00-11:45. Here are the conference details -- http://www.idg.co.jp/expo/lwe/index.html --kevan

Re: MEJB Question

2007-09-25 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:03 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I am leaning towards deploying MEJB as an EJBModule. To auto deploy this I will be adding an mejb config. Are there any objections? no :-) I've been wondering if we should try to

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-25 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:51 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've committed to branches/2.0 also. Thanks David! I think this leaves us with: * integration of the MEJB code itself * release of OpenEJB 3.0-Beta One thing I've noticed -- the default JNDI name for EJB's has been changed in OpenEJB. So,

Re: svn commit: r577890 - in /geronimo/server: branches/2.0/modules/geronimo-deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/xmlbeans/ branches/2.0/modules/geronimo-j2ee-schema/src/test/resour

2007-09-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Vamsi, In general I think we agree on how things should be handled when schema changes. Also, the patch I looked at had schema changes made in the existing .xsd files and I assumed that the new files would be introduced in trunk only. But since

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 25, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 25, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: One thing I've noticed -- the default JNDI name for EJB's has been changed in OpenEJB. So, there is a compatibility issue with 2.0.1. We might be able to configure how OpenEJB generates

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Donald Woods wrote: OK, I'm done updating the 2.0.x closed issues (sorry for all the JIRA emails.) The only one I couldn't figure out, was: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3423 Donald, Thanks a bunch for going through all of those Jiras!

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-27 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Donald Woods wrote: OK, I'm done updating the 2.0.x closed issues (sorry for all the JIRA emails.) The only one I couldn't figure out, was: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3423 Donald

Re: Distributing AspectJ JARs - License

2007-10-03 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: Hi Matt, Yes: I would like to add this dependency from the Eclipse Foundation to a config so that it gets included in the assemblies: dependency groupIdaspectj/groupId artifactIdaspectjrt/artifactId

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.2

2007-10-03 Thread Kevan Miller
The sources jars (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-3.2/org/ apache/xbean/xbean-classloader/3.2/xbean-classloader-3.2-sources.jar) are missing LICENSE and NOTICE files. The xbean-reflect pom (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ tags/xbean-3.2/xbean-reflect/pom.xml) is

Re: Distributing AspectJ JARs - License

2007-10-03 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 3, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Donald Woods wrote: We aren't pulling WADI into the Tomcat assemblies yet, so only the Jetty assemblies need the update, right? Technically correct. However, we aren't that granular at the moment. We currently don't differentiate between tomcat/jetty,

Re: Branches/2.0 24 hour branch notice for 2.0.2 release processing

2007-10-05 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I think Kevan was going to do this yesterday but in his sleep deprived state from Globe trotting he may still be snoozing. I'll let him whack me on the head if my notice is inconsistent with his desire as release manager. We'll create

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-10-05 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote: What's the plan for creating a 2.0.2 branch in preparation of closing down the release? Matt sent a note earlier today, while I was in a jet-lagged impose slumber... I'll plan on creating a branches/2.0.2 for finalizing release activity on

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.2

2007-10-05 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have finally uploaded a new release condidate. Please review. I have only modified the root pom to make sure the jars include the needed files. Great. Thanks Guillaume. +1 --kevan

Re: svn commit: r578812 - /geronimo/server/trunk/configs/jetty6/src/main/plan/plan.xml

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:34 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I am surprised that the ServerInfo reference is not there in the file because http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/ configs/jetty6/src/plan/plan.xml?r1=577801r2=577800pathrev=577801 shows that it is there in the commit!!

Re: Requirements for releasing a vendor specific version of DayTrader?

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 2, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: It would be a powered by version if the name is used. AFAICT there is no restriction to take the code and call it Chris' Benchmark. I spect there are others out there with more insight on how some of this work. Bill Stoddard would know

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Jason Warner wrote: You're using the correct command to build the tool. I just checked out the latest version and built it with no issues? It was recently moved to the devtools component. Is that where you checked it out from? What problems are you

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
All, I've created a 2.0.2 release branch -- https://svn.apache.org/repos/ asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2 And have updated the branches/2.0 version to be 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT (with a helping hand from Donald :) Vamsi is working on an update to the CA Helper in the console. Joe B is working

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Jason Warner wrote: It looks like you're building from the ui package. The ui package has dependencies on a few other packages in j2g. The error your getting is complaining about not being able to find a built version of those packages. That error message

Re: svn commit: r582931 [3/3] - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.devtools.j2g.resources: ./ META-INF/ schema/ src/ src/org/ src/org/apache/ src/org/apache/geronimo/ src/org/

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Added: geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk/plugins/ org.apache.geronimo.devtools.j2g.resources/test-apps/security/ geronimo-secutiry-plan.xml Hi Lin, 'security' is misspelled in this new plan name... --kevan

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Lin Sun wrote: Hi Kevan, Could you try building with mvn install? I am able to build j2g fine with that. Yes, 'mvn install' completes without error. However, I don't think that's running a full build... I see individual jar files are built, but there's no

Re: J2G - GERONIMODEVTOOLS-221

2007-10-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 8, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Cool, thanks for doing this. As soon as you're done with this JIRA, I'll create a branch for a 1.0.0 release I'd like to know how to build and run j2g... There are no license/notice files, atm... Also, RAT is flagging the following

Re: jetty jee5 assembly broken in branches/2.0

2007-10-09 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 9, 2007, at 12:59 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Oh, I think I know what's going on. Jetty is configured with 3 connectors. Each connector is configured with 50 threads. So by the time the server starts up all the threads in the pool are taken.. Looks like in Jetty we must set the thread pool

[VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2

2007-10-09 Thread Kevan Miller
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we need to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the Geronimo 2.0.2 release. geronimo-txmanager contains the geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector components. The proposed binary release artifacts can be

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-10-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 10, 2007, at 6:16 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've created a 2.0.2 release branch -- https://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2 And have updated the branches/2.0 version to be 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT (with a helping hand from Donald :) Vamsi

Board Report for October -- Input Needed

2007-10-10 Thread Kevan Miller
All, Geronimo is scheduled to give a Board report on October 17th. Here is a wiki page to gather status -- http://cwiki.apache.org/ confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2007-10+- +October Please have your updates in by Sunday October 14th. This allows the status to be

Re: svn commit: r583850 - in /geronimo/gbuild/daily_build_scripts: ./ gbuild.sh openejb.sh tck.sh testsuite.sh

2007-10-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: prasad Date: Thu Oct 11 08:23:05 2007 New Revision: 583850 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=583850view=rev Log: * checking in scripts that run daily build, run testsuite and tck smoketests Added:

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-10-11 Thread Kevan Miller
All, I've updated the versions in branches/2.0.2 from 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 2.0.2. No code changes should be going into 2.0.2. I'm going to be finalizing the release notes and building binaries later tonight. The ibiblio repo is having problems this afternoon. To build successfully, I had

Re: KEYS ?

2007-10-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: And... this is done. I don't know what else needs to be changed... if anyone runs into any problems lemme know. The new location for this puppy in svn is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS Props need to check the current

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2

2007-10-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: [ ] +1 Release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 Oops. Accidentally sent my vote directly to myself instead of the dev list. Here's my +1. --kevan

Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Donald, I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for releasing a 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should hold off. Right. They aren't ok. And must be fixed

Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Donald, I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for releasing a 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should hold off. By the way, the patches seem to be missing a

Re: svn commit: r584040 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2/RELEASE_NOTES-2.0.2.txt

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Thu Oct 11 21:25:03 2007 New Revision: 584040 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584040view=rev Log: Add RELEASE-NOTES for 2.0.2 release .

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
All A reminder about this release vote. Hoping to call the vote tomorrow. --kevan On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we need to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the Geronimo 2.0.2 release

[VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to the zip files:

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: [ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0.2 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.0.2 (please provide rationale) Here's my +1 --kevan

[RESULT] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2

2007-10-13 Thread Kevan Miller
All, The vote passed with 10 +1 votes and no -1 votes. I'll work on pushing the binaries, but not tonight -- probably tomorrow. --kevan

Re: svn commit: r584163 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2/RELEASE_NOTES-2.0.2.txt

2007-10-15 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 15, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: snip I should have reported this early. This should read Updated CA (Certification Authority) Helper application. CA Helper application is not part of the Admin Console. Not a big thing though, but, do consider this change if

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Kevan Miller
Thanks for the votes so far. The 72 hours expires at 10 PM (EDT), this evening. I'll give it a bit more time for others to inspect. I'll plan on calling the vote tomorrow morning -- around 9 AM my time... --kevan

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

2007-10-16 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Maybe try getting a thread dump while the process appears to be hanging (kill -QUIT jvm process). That might give a clue on what's going on. You can also try tracking memory utilization (since there have been multiple reports of needing more

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Any help on this issue On 10/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to simulate the allowHosts feature for geronimo 2.0.1 which was available in geronimo 1.2. With geronimo 1.2 it works fine and I am able to

[RESULT] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
All, This vote has passed with a unanimous 17 +1 votes. Thanks all. Will start pushing binaries... --kevan On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Hi Kevan, It would be great if we can have allowHosts feature back in AG. Shall I open a jira for this issue? Hi Ashish, Yes, thanks. That would be helpful. --kevan

Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?

2007-10-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Lin Sun wrote: Hi Kevan, I've marked G3309 as resolved. I documented my analysis in the latest few comments I added in the JIRA. If there is anything else that is missing from a legal point of view, please let me know. Hi Lin, That's great. Thanks for

[SECURITY] Potential vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Webdav servlet

2007-10-18 Thread Kevan Miller
The Geronimo project has learned of a security vulnerability in the Apache Tomcat Webdav Servlet implementation. If you use a Tomcat configuration of Geronimo and configure a write-enabled Webdav servlet, you may be affected by this vulnerability. If you do not configure the Webdav servlet

Re: svn commit: r586078 - in /geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk: LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt

2007-10-18 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Lin, Great. 2 minor comments... --kevan On Oct 18, 2007, at 2:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: linsun Date: Thu Oct 18 11:56:41 2007 New Revision: 586078 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586078view=rev Log: some changes per Kevan's comments on license/notice file on dev list

[ANNOUNCE] Availability of Geronimo 2.0.2

2007-10-19 Thread Kevan Miller
All, Wanted to let everyone know that the Geronimo 2.0.2 binaries are available for download -- http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html 2.0.2 addresses a number of issues that were found in our 2.0.1 release, including the MEJB security vulnerability. Great work everyone! --kevan

Re: Location of tx manager component in source distro?

2007-10-23 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Guy Pardon wrote: Hi, This component: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ components/txmanager/ ...does not seem to figure in the source distribution 2.0.2 - or did I miss something? Hi Guy, components are released separately from our server

Re: Location of tx manager component in source distro?

2007-10-23 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Guy Pardon wrote: Hi, I see. Then what is the name of the component's classes jar and where is it in the distribution? They are: repository/org/apache/geronimo/components/geronimo-transaction/2.0.2/ geronimo-transaction-2.0.2.jar

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 587047

2007-10-23 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 23, 2007, at 4:17 AM, Peter Petersson wrote: I still have problem building G v2.0.2 from svn tag org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.2-r579367 is missing anyone else seeing this ? regards That's caused by a build of xbean created by OpenEJB. The jar file can be found here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin (GEP) questions

2007-10-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about the Geronimo Eclipse plugin: 1. How many versions of the Geronimo server should we continue to simultaneously support in the Geronimo Eclipse plugin ?? 2. What level of

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

2007-10-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please list the pros and cons. Here's my list: Pro's * Easier for other projects to reuse GShell * Release cycle not tied to Geronimo server release cycle Con's * Small

Re: time to remove old plan files?

2007-10-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 26, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Is it time to remove the old/unused plan files from trunk? I mean the plan files in configs/module/src/plan/plan.xml. They have been replaced by plans in configs/module/src/main/plan/plan.xml. Sounds good... --kevan

Re: geronimo terracotta plugin demo

2007-10-26 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Orion, Thanks for the note. I'm definitely interested in progress on the geronimo terracotta plugin. So thanks for giving us a status update. I have one clarification, below... On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Orion Letizi wrote: On Monday, we demonstrated the bitchen geronimo terracotta

Re: TCK access

2007-10-27 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I think that Geir has to ACK that the paperwork was completed. Has he done so? I don't see an ACK on our tck list. I recall that Tim had a lot of problems getting the NDA acked. Geir, Do you have an NDA on file for Jay McHugh? If

Re: Build problem

2007-10-28 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 28, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Heinz Drews wrote: Hello, is there any fix or bypass available to get rid of [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: J2G future positioning

2007-10-29 Thread Kevan Miller
On 10/29/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we'll position the J2G plugin in the future ?? I understand now that in its initial iteration that it is narrowly scoped to work for JBoss specific migrations only (thus the JBoss in the name).

[DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

2007-11-01 Thread Kevan Miller
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with these capabilities. They provide a more solid

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

2007-11-01 Thread Kevan Miller
No, not in my opinion. I haven't heard of any dissenters. There's been plenty of time for someone to raise an objection. I say -- have at it... --kevan On 11/1/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So shall we move the project out of the sandbox? Do we need an official vote for this?

Re: [VOTE] Release Devtools maven-plugins-1.0 RC1

2007-11-02 Thread Kevan Miller
+1. I ran RAT and inspected the binaries. All looked good. Thanks Donald! --kevan On 10/30/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G tools and are not included in either tool. A 72 hour vote is being called for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release J2G 1.0.0 RC1

2007-11-06 Thread Kevan Miller
What are they .project and .classpath files? They don't have ASL license headers... I assume JBoss is a trademarked name. We are using it in some file names and in some file contents. Are we handling this correctly? I don't know the answer off hand. There was a recent discussion about aggregating

Re: [DISCUSS] Release J2G 1.0.0 RC1

2007-11-06 Thread Kevan Miller
Strange. In j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/~dwoods/releases/j2g-1.0.0/j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-deployable.zipthe LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files are write-only (i.e. I have to chmod +r to read them). I haven't tried building yet. Is this an artifact of

Re: Geronimo IRC logs

2007-11-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 8, 2007 8:55 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know why IRC is not being logged? Don't know why, but I've pinged the contact we've used in the past at uwyn.com. Hopefully we can get it restarted... --kevan

Re: Geronimo Project Management

2007-11-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 7, 2007 6:47 PM, khaldi hinda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have to represent the Project Apache Geronimo during a lecture of Software Project Management. It is possible to send me the Geronimo Project Management Documents (more precisely : aim of the architecture, all about

Re: Geronimo IRC logs

2007-11-08 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 8, 2007 8:55 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know why IRC is not being logged? I think this should be fixed, now... Somebody needs to start an IRC conversation, before we know for sure... ;-) --kevan

Re: [ANN] JOSSO (Java Open Single Sign-On) support added for Geronimo

2007-11-09 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Gianluca wrote: Apache Geronimo J2EE server 2.0 is now officially supported by JOSSO 1.6 for both Single Sign-On Agent and Gateway deployments. For detailed technical guidelines on how to setup JOSSO with Apache Geronimo see :

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

2007-11-09 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hey y'all, I started to map some of the new features/functions to the 2.1 documentation. I just created a new wiki space http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21 and created some initial entries. Pls chime in with your ideas for topics to cover

Re: svn commit: r594117 [1/2] - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/src/main/resources/cluster-repository/ assemblies/ge

2007-11-13 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Gianny, I notice that this scheme is storing admin username and password in clear text. It will also make the username/password accessible via JMX. I think we need to avoid this. Would prefer to see this information handled in a manner more consistent with our handling of sensitive

Re: svn commit: r594117 [1/2] - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/src/main/resources/cluster-repository/ assemblies/ge

2007-11-14 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 13, 2007 4:40 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gianny,I notice that this scheme is storing admin username and password in clear text. It will also make the username/password accessible via JMX. I think we need to avoid this. Would prefer to see this information handled

Re: Netbeans plugin

2007-11-16 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 16, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Siamak Sarmady wrote: Hello, I was speaking over email with Jacek Laskowski about his netbeans plugin. For sometimes I have been using Geronimo with Eclipse and I should say it is much more faster than Glasfish. I am sure if the netbeans plugin can be

Re: Deploying jboss seam 2.0.0.GA's jee5 sample onto geronimo 2.1-SNAPSHOT...DONE

2007-11-16 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Nov 15, 2007 8:37 AM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to let you know I'm still working on it and ended up with the following plan with no changes to the sample application - booking. With the plan I can easily deploy the

Re: Distribution and start/stop of clustered deployments

2007-11-16 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Gianny Damour wrote: Hi Joe, After some investigations, here is my understanding of problem 1: there are two deployments because by default, i.e. when no target is specified, the distribute command executes against all the configuration stores defined by a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >