On May 12, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
yup, Confluence notifications from SCM are no longer flowing.
If you are monitoring the spaces individually then you should still
receive the notifications.
Is there a reason that this has changed? I think all change notices
should be
Rick,
yoko-1.0/LICENSE contains the following. At a minimum, the third_party
references need to be removed. IIUC, the OMG license should stay. I'm
not sure about the ANTLR license.
for the idl.g component:
ANTLR 2 License
We reserve no legal rights to the ANTLR--it is fully in
On May 12, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
+1 I think it makes sense to upgrade if you've built with the
fixes that we need to have included and it doesn't create any other
problems (esp. TCK issues).
Agreed. I think we should fix in both trunk and branches/2.1
--kevan
Jason
Oops. I think I failed to mention one other thing... The following
files should be deleted. They no longer apply to Yoko.
yoko-1.0/DISCLAIMER.txt
yoko-1.0/STATUS
They aren't legal show-stoppers. However, I'd recommend removing them
and reducing confusion.
Everything else looks good.
On May 12, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
We have discussed in the past the idea of getting some ASF hosted
machines that we can use to run and share TCK test results for
Geronimo. With more folks coming on board running TCK tests this
seems to be getting more and more
On May 13, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
I'll volunteer to help out on supporting the machines.
I haven't been able to to much useful TCK work since my most
powerful available system is a laptop that gets restarted twice a day.
Heh. That sounds less than ideal. Jay, I'm pretty
On May 13, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Right I was running 2 very beefy machines manually in a dedicated
fashion with no automation. If we want something to share,
multiple VM images, and multiple concurrent tests then it would
On May 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
What happened to the AMD systems which were heating up my
apartment last year? 2 4x (dual core) 16g machines with nice RAID
cards, etc
On May 15, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
What happened to the AMD systems which were heating up my
apartment last year? 2 4x
On May 15, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Well, you can't donate to 'Geronimo' per se only to the ASF. I
wasn't involved directly in this, but I believe the heritage for
the machines is AMD - IBM. IBM people used the machines for their
geronimo work (including GBuild).
I
On May 15, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I did a quick search on the web for what it would take to build two
systems. Here is the initial SWAG.
SuperMicro CSE-825S2-R700LPV U2 Rackmountable eATX Case (700W PSU,
Silver) $750 x 2 = $1500
Sony DRU190A 20X DVD Rewritable Drive -
On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a
committer who I could easily find a gmail address for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On May 16, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 15, 2008, at 2:32 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's
a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Hi Raymond,
One minor netiquette comment... Looks like you used a Reply To
button when generating your note (then changed the subject line). Some
mail readers will still group your email in the previous email thread
(one example is Mac OS X Mail). This can cause emails to be lost/cause
On May 16, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
+1 to allow non-committers 'user' access to analytics (Should we
have an actual vote or just let this go by if there is lazy
consensus?)
Thanks for the input. IMO lazy consensus is fine for this. Anyone
feels otherwise, we can spin up a
I added Erik and Gianny.
--kevan
On May 17, 2008, at 5:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, jontto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could not find a Debian package of Geronimo, is there any
particular
reason for this or has it just not got done yet?
On May 18, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi Jontto
Upps! I did not realize I was reading the dev list and answering a
question addressed to a geronimo developer ;). FYI I am not a
geronimo developer just a user but I hope my contribution to the
discussion make sens anyway.
I've added Dan and Joseph.
--kevan
Has anybody talked to Infra about virtualization environments,
restrictions, guidance?
Only 4 VM images? With an 8 core, I thought we'd try to allocate a VM
per core...
--kevan
On May 19, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
It appears that the discussion has died down on this topic. Here
By the way, I volunteer to help admin these beasts.
On May 19, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Has anybody talked to Infra about virtualization environments,
restrictions, guidance?
I exchanged some emails with Justin Erenkrantz and asked about the
VM issue. He
.
- Capability to manually run tests on demand would also be supported.
Admin Volunteers:
- Joe Bohn (PMC)
- Jay McHugh (PMC)
- Jason Warner
- Matt Hogstrom (PMC)
- Kevan Miller (PMC)
--kevan
Yeah! :-D
Thanks for getting notifies fixed David Blevins!
Heh. And thanks for the doc David Jencks! ;-)
--kevan
On May 20, 2008, at 12:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page Created : GMOxDOC21 : Basic Hints on Security Configuration
Basic Hints on Security Configuration has been created by
tests,
and produce reports.
- Capability to manually run tests on demand would also be supported.
Admin Volunteers:
- Joe Bohn (PMC)
- Jay McHugh (PMC)
- Jason Warner
- Matt Hogstrom (PMC)
- Kevan Miller (PMC)
On May 19, 2008, at 11:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've noticed that my builds seem to spend a lot of time looking at
non-standard repos such as apache m2-incubating, the often
disfunctional java.net m1 repo, codehaus snapshots etc etc. I'd
like to suggest that our main project poms not
IMO, we should update branches/2.1, also, and remove the build of yoko
from branches/2.1/repository.
--kevan
On May 21, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Rick McGuire (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
On May 23, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Phani Madgula wrote:
Hi,
I would like to contribute to Apache Geronimo Documentation. I have
started contributing to documentation around deployment plans and JPA
as given in the below links.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/deployment-plans.html
I thought that non-committer write access to Confluence had been
turned off. I now see that it was one of your questions -- my answer
is now.
Hernan, can you make this happen?
WRT further process questions, see inline...
--kevan
On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Guys
Hi Jarek,
The svn src does not contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file.
Also, the NOTICE file generated for the jar files lists the product
name as JAX-WS 2.1 API. This should be Apache JAX-WS 2.1 or
Apache Geronimo JAX-WS 2.1 API. Simple update of the pom.xml will
fix that.
Everything else
+1
Thanks Jarek!
--kevan
On May 23, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar is used by Axis2 and CXF projects and it will help
Geronimo in transition to JAX-WS 2.1. This is a very first release of
the JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar.
This version contains fixes for the problems Kevan
On May 23, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Geronimo PMC would like to make the following request of the ASF
Infrastructure team. The request is specifically for machines to
be used
for collaboration and
On May 27, 2008, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David,
Thanks for committing this to trunk. It will be great to have the
itests for samples.
I have few questions on the shared sample datasource plugin (not
just for David to answer):
Hi Geert,
People sure do miss the IRC bot when it stops working! :-)
Hoping you can give your Geronimo bot a gentle nudge...
--kevan
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Rick,
Is there any reason to not include this fix in branches/2.1 as well?
Nopeother than I couldn't think of any reason why it needed to
be included either.
IMO, it should be merged into 2.1 and 2.0 for that matter.
On Jun 3, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Geert Bevin wrote:
Sorry, there have been problems since the freenode maintenance. It
should be back now.
Geert,
Thanks! Looks good.
--kevan
Why reproduce the Stateless Session Bean Tutorial here? Better to
refer to it, then get to the important part -- how to create a plugin...
--kevan
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Would this let us remove Dojo 0.4.3 from the server or would we keep
it there for users who might still be using it? If so, how long are
we going to do that for? My vote would be to yank it out after
we're no longer dependent on it, but
On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1 for trunk.
I was assuming trunk in my discussion.
Can you also move the older versions out of trunk and into the
geronimo/plugins branch, so people can optionally install them if
their app still needs them?
If you're wanting to
Lin,
When we commit code that was provided to us in a patch, we should
provide an attribution within the commit message. In this case,
something like:
GERONIMO-4027 Patch from Joe Leong. Thanks Joe! Accessibility issue:
Tree icons in high contrast mode cannot be seen
I may be a bit
On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the
vote for the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1.1
I'm inclined to vote -1. Nothing to do with the plugin, per se. It
looks fine. It's really a server issue...
Using a
On Jun 8, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the
vote for the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1.1
I'm inclined to vote -1. Nothing to do with the plugin
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I think I got a little further after installing the native libraries
as described on http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/apr.html but
things still failed for me with NoClassDefFoundError:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
at
On Jun 9, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
My 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT build from this morning has them under repository/
org/apache/tomcat -
catalinacoyote jasper jasper-jdt tribes
catalina-ha extras jasper-el juli
Strange. It's in the latest
On Jun 9, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I think you might be looking at the Jetty assembly. Tomcat assembly
has all the jars.
Heh. Must have unpacked the wrong assembly. Time for bed, I guess... ;-)
We're either missing org/apache/tomcat/jni/OS somehow. Or else missing
the native
On May 25, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Kevan Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume building out a new data center is something we will need
to do,
regardless? These machines would put us over the tipping point?
No, not really - we're
+1
--kevan
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:00 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a second release candidate for the Server Repository
plugin. This candidate resolves the issues with deploying the
plugin in various Geronimo 2.1* releases. Much of the information
regarding the need for the plugin
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
If you can point me to GShell docs or specific source files in 1.0-
alpha1-1 on how to create platform specific settings (like OS400,
4NT, Cygwin, ...) then I'd be happy to take a look at reducing the
cruft But for now, I was trying to
Hi Lin,
Thanks for reverting and recommitting the change. This problem wasn't
your fault. It was the fault of whoever created these files in svn.
See http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-
configuration.html for information about svn client configuration for
our project.
As
On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
That is good to know. Thanks!
Do you happen to know if the python script would run on windows?
It should if you have python installed -- http://www.python.org/download/
--kevan
On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi Joe,
This might be obvious but where is the source code for this? I
downloaded the server-repo-1.0-sources.jar from your staging repo
link but I don't see any java code there.
svn pointer should definitely be included in any vote...
On Jun 13, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the
vote for the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+
Joe
Jarek posted an concern in his vote on this plugin:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
+1
One minor comment: when
All,
Looks like we've had a lot of good fixes going into branches/2.1. I
think we should aim at creating a 2.1.2 release in the near future
(2-4 weeks is my estimate).
How do others feel? Let's start identifying any must-fix problems and
work on getting those resolved.
--kevan
On Jun 13, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Ted Kirby (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-396:
---
Attachment:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 4:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dwoods
Date: Wed Jun 18 13:07:44 2008
New Revision: 669276
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669276view=rev
Log:
GERONIMO-4123 Updated Dojo License. NOTICE updates - Console
includes code from Pluto. Dojo plugins include
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tkirby
Date: Wed Jun 18 19:13:06 2008
New Revision: 669363
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669363view=rev
Log:
GERONIMODEVTOOLS-397 Bouncy Castle License and Notice needs proper
exposure in GEP files
add more missed
On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I'd like to welcome Ted Kirby as Geronimo's newest committer.
Ted, keep up all the great work on the Eclipse Plugin and welcome
aboard!
Congrats Ted!
--kevan
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
I think the current exception is rather confusion when a user tries to
assemble a server from admin console. He will see an error message
saying the file was not found in the server's console which makes him
to think the created custom assembly
On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:44 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
I think the current exception is rather confusion when a user
tries to
assemble a server from admin console. He will see an error message
I tried to respond to this earlier, but had a machine failure. Pretty
sure I never got to send...
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:21 AM, Ted Kirby wrote:
No. This notice file adds:
Portions of the Eclipse Geronimo Server Adapter were originally
developed by
International Business Machines
On Jun 20, 2008, at 9:32 AM, fp wrote:
I'm working with Geronimo behind a firewall and wanted to remote
install a
plugin or jdbc-driver from the internet.
The JAVA_OPTS=-DproxySet=true -DproxyHost=IP-Adr -DproxyPort=8080
works only
without user/ password authentication
How to set up
On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Joseph Leong wrote:
Hi all,
So i've inventoried what i could find in trunk with items that are
using Dojo, provided is a list of the location and some of the
widgets they are using that will be needed to convert to Dojo's
1.1.1 dijit package. References to
Congrats Shiva!
--kevan
On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Shiva Kumar H R as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Shiva working
with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us
in
+1
--kevan
On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate for the Server Repository
plugin. This candidate corrects the geronimo-plugin.xml and
geronimo-plugins.xml issue regarding the open source license.
The rationale for the plugin remains the
+1
--kevan
On Jun 22, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the maintenance release of
the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.1 RC2.
The deployable zip file is here:
Cool. That's great!
Look forward to seeing your final docs and giving it a try...
--kevan
On Jun 20, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi
With the help of David J custom server assemblies document ( http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/custom-server-assemblies.html
) and my experience
Given the number of Ganymede-based mismatches we've seen lately, I'm
hoping we'll be getting a Ganymede compatible release out soon?
--kevan
On Jun 22, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.1 (RC2)
Release vote.
--
Thanks,
Tim
On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Wed Jun 18 18:57:20 2008
New Revision: 669359
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669359view=rev
Log:
console icons are back (GERONIMO-3562)
Cool. Great to have them back. Thanks Jarek!
--kevan
Not a whole lot of discussion, so far. I'm going to leave this open a
while longer... Hoping we can see a few more opinions voiced.
To date, we have identified the following non-server related work items:
1) New JavaMail release to pick up the recent fixes -- I totally
agree. Happy to see
Congrats Lin!
--kevan
On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Shrey Banga wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working on the EAR PlanCreator and I've observed that dojo
is shipped with all the demos, tests and experimental widgets in
place, causing the folder to be about 12.8 MB on the expanded server
(2.2-SNAPSHOT).
Looking at
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hey,
Right now, the plugins portlet is not all that visible in the admin
console (it's under Applications / Plugins). I think it would be great
to make it more visible by creating a new Plugins section with
Install, Export, and Assemble Server
On Jun 27, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Shrey Banga wrote:
As for the including the rest of DojoX, since it a significant part
of the reducing effort. Would it make sense to build a custom js
for monitoring, remove the rest of DojoX and if the development
starts shifting to a real need for DojoX
On Jun 29, 2008, at 6:14 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi Kevan (or any other with some knowledge about legal stuff),
I think you are the man to as here and my question is what shall I
do about the legal stuff I don't have much of a clue about these
things.
As I have said before I am
On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:06 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi Arnaud
After installing the Geronimo Plugins, Tomcat :: Deployer plugin
(using the plugins console) you will be able to deploy other war
files.
regards
I think you're going to want Geronimo Plugins, Jasper :: Deployer
and
On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Shrey Banga wrote:
Hi,
While working on PlanCreator, I initially restarted it after each
modification to the code which is too cumbersome for testing small
changes especially in the JSPs. Thanks to Manu, I realized that
there's an easier workaround to this:-
On Jul 3, 2008, at 5:10 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hello,
I am back from holiday; A quick scan of the mailing lists tells me
that the upgrade to WADI 2.0 is causing classloader clashes.
As identified by Jason W. and Kevan, a Tribes class is loaded by two
distinct classloaders (tomcat6 and
.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT
To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board.
It is an initial reminder
On Jul 3, 2008, at 2:53 AM, Jack wrote:
Hi all!
A newbie here - Cai Jun Jie. You can also call me Jack!
My teammates and I have been looking at accessibility of Geronimo's
Admin Console. Most people would think that accessibility only
matters for the disabled. Yet some people argue -
On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We kinda started to have some discussion some time ago but couldn't
find any
hit on nabble so not sure were we left it.
It's likely because we've been discussing
On Jul 7, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Given that there were no objections to my offer to be release
manager for 2.1.2 - I'll go ahead and assume the role :-).
There have been a number of JIRAs identified as required and others
as optional. In addition to this there were already
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
snip
Is there anything else that we're missing?
Samples -- I'm tempted to say that I need to see a released/
deployable samples for a 2.1.2 release.
I'm
I updated the new Board Report on the Wiki earlier in the week. Have a
look at it please. I'll be submitting on Monday morning (will plan on
removing empty sections before then).
--kevan
On Jul 3, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th
On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Can I edit this a little, want to add some context to the gshell bits?
Go for it...
--kevan
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Going once ... going twice
Anybody that thinks we need to release samples for 2.1 and/or 2.1.1
should speak up soon. So far the consensus is a 2.1.2 release only.
I think it's ok for the samples release to only be supported on 2.1.2
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:55 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been looking at JASPI lately, first working with jetty to base
its authentication on jaspi, and now looking at implementing a
provider for geronimo. I think it makes sense to have this as a
component (like the tm/connector framework)
On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:58 PM, ravi naik wrote:
hi..
thanks for the reply...
i am using my sql as DB...
i am Integrating intalio and Jsp through Geronimo.
i am using Mysqlodbc connctor.not jdbc
thanks in advance...
Ravi,
Try increasing the heap size of your Geronimo server
On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:47 AM, ravi naik wrote:
hi kevan..
thanks for reply...
but how to increase heap size of geronimo
i am having 512 mb ram...
How are you starting Geronimo?
'set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx192m'
and
'geronimo run'
Is one option...
--kevan
thankx...
Kevan Miller [EMAIL
On Jul 10, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
It seems that once per day one of the automatic trunk builds deadlocks
in the following way (this only happens with the Jetty assembly):
Is anybody else seeing this too? We've had similar problems like
this before...
I've not seen a
Rick,
Please send a [RESULT] note, if this vote has concluded.
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
This is a vote for a combined release of javamail spec and the
javamail provider (+ the uber jar). The provider changes have
depedencies on the spec changes, so these need to be
will be uploading to the repository today, and will update the
Geronimo code bases to point to the new version once it has
propagated to central.
Rick
Kevan Miller wrote:
Rick,
Please send a [RESULT] note, if this vote has concluded.
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Rick McGuire wrote
On Jul 9, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Thanks Jarek, I will explore JMX to see if I can get all the dynamic
info I am looking for. If JMX does provide such info, I will revert
back all these and use JMX instead.
Shiva,
How do things stand with your investigations? IMO, this
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF
has a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give
them the green light they will push a release soon.
At this point I'm trying to decide the best course
On Jul 22, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
OK. The vote for the 2.0.8 release is up:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.8-td18602257.html
Hopefully I can find some time this weekend to finish the vote and
get it synced to central. (assuming the vote passes)
Great. Thanks
All,
There was a recent report by Fortify on Open Source Security --
http://www.fortify.com/l/oss/assets/OpenSource_Security_WP_v5.pdf
The report says there were some number of potential vulnerabilities
identified in Geronimo. No details of the vulnerabilities have been
reported to us
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:58 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi, assuming that you have disabled the myfaces and myfaces-deployer
module, did you update your artifact-aliases.properties file per the
instruction here
(http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/how-to-upgrade-jars-and-swap-modules.html)?
Also, if your
On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
Which geronimo version are you using? did you install the
tomcat-javaee5 assembly?
You should see this path - GERONIMO_HOME/var/catalina/conf/web.xml.
Heh. I think we can assume that Ravi is using geronimo-jetty... ;-)
--kevan
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
I too am +1 to moving JAXB classes from Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in
(GEP) to Geronimo (G). That way in addition to GEP, G's deployment
system in future, Plan Creator and may be some others too will reap
the benefits of JAXB.
One concern
On Jul 29, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Joseph Leong wrote:
Hi everyone,
So i'm building a little widget piece to run on AG and i've come to
the point of deciding whether i'm going to incorporate any (if) dojo/
dojox components into it. I know we've had varying discussions
about reducing the dojo
On Jul 30, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Jack wrote:
Before this post sinks, would someone help to put the accessibility
guidelines somewhere in our doc? Maybe in the coding standard? If I
can get the write access (I've signed ICLA), I can do that if no one
objects...
I doubt there will be any
On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:25 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I think it would be nicer to create pages with 2.2 specific content
somewhere under http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/index.html for now.
Once we have 2.2 documentation space setup we can move the
701 - 800 of 3005 matches
Mail list logo
