[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2758:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
Assignee: Donald
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2530:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Enable configuration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1686:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3194:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Upgrading documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2621:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Exception handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2534:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Security realms port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2884:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> JNDI Name Not Corr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3089:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> geronimo-activemq-r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1638:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> Multiple servers sharing the same repo and con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3059:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> CLIs refactoring - options and arguments pars
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3059:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> CLIs refactoring - opti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1945:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Console's web app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2015:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Let's replace JKS t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2424:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0.x
> Add config.xml supp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1638:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Multiple servers shar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2045:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0.x
> Plugin prerequisites:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1471:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Connector dependenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1807:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Remove uses of ObjectN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-795:
---
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
> Extend Portlet skin capabilities to support minimize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-1631:
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
> NoSuchConfigException when restarting app af
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2025:
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
You can now commit yout own patches. Yayy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-1907:
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
> Deploy command should redeploy if the app is alre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2699:
-
Description:
When deploying an EAR using exploded option, after initialing geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-795:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Extend Portlet s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2737:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Server shutdown time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2210:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
Verification Required
> Ena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2622:
-
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2905:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> We need to accept bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2581:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Update Version Numbers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2885:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> JSF is leaking applicat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1786:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> JMS Listeners for protoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1907:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Deploy command sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2286:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> app client plan still u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2246:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Why resource-env-ref:ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2128:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Allow user to specify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2028:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Plugin export errors do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1842:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
Following Dain's fix, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1829:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.x)
2.0
> Service Plans should al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1829:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
See if the workaround can be applied to the 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1631:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> NoSuchConfigException w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1354:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.x)
(was: 2.0-M5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1488:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> externalize sensitive d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2025:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> Undeploy and redeploy w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2640:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0.x
> Expose "developm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2660:
-
Description:
Uniqueness constraint is missing in multiple places in geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2127:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
(was: 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1980:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
(was: 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-250:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
Verification Required
> Connec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-268:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
Verification Required
> Connect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2290:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0.x
> Percent complete g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-603:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
> IllegalArgumentException w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2288:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0.x
> Abstract/Maven repositories install modules incorrec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1277:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
Verification Required
> Cha
Yes.. I have created 1.2 branch of this schema in svn.
We should hopefully be able to release 2.3.0 of xmlbeans-maven-plugins
soon. Once that is done, I shall put the 1.2 version of j2ee-1.4
schema up for a release vote.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/24/07, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All this exercise is only for the Java EE 5 schema artifacts, right ?
We don't plan to do it for j2ee-1.4 schema artifacts, correct ?
Because, it has already been released.
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/1.1/
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its about that time to liberate trunk from the lethargy of waiting
for 2.0 to ship and I propose that we branch on Monday morning around
0900 Eastern time. This will make trunk 2.1-SNAPSHOT and I'll copy
trunk to branches/2.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-1525.
Resolution: Fixed
user-error. I was specifying the whole url jdbc:derby:(dbname}...
it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reopened GERONIMO-1525:
--
I still see this error in 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Try to create a DB pool wizard and click on
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've mentioned this a few times before...
I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo
dir. As in:
svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/g
-repository/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/
Neverthless, they all have *.xsb files in them.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 1.1-SNAPSHOT that we released earlier has the XSBs in them too.
http://people.apache.org/r
I used -
grep -t "Sun" *
on WinXP to find the copyright and then opened the file with Visual SlickEdit
, which will open anything and handles embedded nulls.
On Linux, open the file with vi and just search for Sun.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> What did you use to view the xsb
der in it -
schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans\system\s89707DCAF3CBDF7238EB45FA6C3735CD\index.xsb
Is that OK?
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Please review the release candidate of version 1.1 of
> geronimo-schema-jee_5.
>
> The tar ball is at
> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/geronimo-sc
Please review the release candidate of version 1.1 of geronimo-schema-jee_5.
The tar ball is at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1.tar.gz
The svn location (with restricted access) is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/geronimo-tck/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/branches/1.
I'm +1 for releasing it just the way it is. Don't spend any more time fixing it.
However, I also understand that once it has been released, it will
have to be maintained to some extent. (Unless we can ask bug
reporters to move up to 2.0, if it addresses that problem.)
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/17/07
Jeff mentioned that people feel strongly about their webservices pack
much like they would about religion. Does anybody have an idea on how
these are most commonly used ?
1. Do people preferring one webservices pack also prefer one
webcontainer over another ? Eg. do axis2 folks prefer Jetty over
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/16/07, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's what I get for cutting and pasting a previous vote as my starting
point :-)
Ok, we're voting on the following:
1) Release 1.1 of the javamail 1.4 spec API. The artifact in question
is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1.
The voting ends with 11 ayes. I shall release the specs now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now
nimo needed a release. This is further complicated by the project
incubating status, since it requires two levels of voting to get released.
Rick
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
> please chase these projects and get them to release t
If you are doing an offline build on a clean repo, you will have to
build javamail separately from it's own svn tree. It is not a part of
the Geronimo tree.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/12/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I do an offline build, I am getting the following build err
Thanx. I updated the wiki list too.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/11/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated the CXF version. That should be one less hopefully.
Also, I think the "axiom" and "wadi" libraries are missing in this list.
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad
A convenient wiki page to track the progress
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/SNAPSHOT+dependencies+that+need+to+be+released+for+Geronimo+2.0
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
please
Jacek,
You are right. That is the correct SNAPSHOT version
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/11/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Where did you find it? I can't see in the top-
The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
please chase these projects and get them to release the artifacts,
whatever it takes; contacts, muscles, bribes, favors, etc :-)
If enough people on this list volunteer to get some of these released,
then I'll create a wiki page w
And my +1 too
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please revi
Yeah.. Maybe I didn't want to spook this vote again with a Friday the
13th deadline ;-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right?
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The activ
Using the published openejb artifacts will give this problem. Build
openejb locally to get around this. Hopefully somebody from openejb
will publish new snaps soon.
Cross-posting to openejb dev list for their attention.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Lasantha Ranaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
On 7/8/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One obvious problem here is that the plugin installation is trying to use
the geronimo-transaction-jta11 module which doesn't exist any more.
Trying the link
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.0/repository/indicates
the apache snapsho
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/
Voting concludes on M
Kevan,
I'll work on it.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/9/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
> other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
> issues so I'll
On 6/28/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice. Thanks for doing this Jay and Prasad...
Nothing really jumps out at me as being unnecessary... Just scanning
that list for the big hitters...
com/sun (5M) is new
org/apache/yoko (4M) is new
org/apache/castor (3M) is new. OpenEJB is no l
David "Master Yoda" Jencks,
When you went through the list of artifacts in our G repo, did you see
any that looked like we may not need it but it may have been picked up
as a M2 transitive dep ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/1/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Kev
On 6/21/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
working that way too.
All in all its been an excellent six month
Another thing to remember is that M2 builds gave us transitive
dependencies. So it could quite be possible that we picked up some
unneeded artifacts.
We bloated by 20+M from 1.1 to 1.2.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/28/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Jay D. McHu
allow us to compare similar artifacts, like
repository/org/codehaus/castor/castor
which would show us any growth between Castor 0.9.5.3 to 1.0.5.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Here is a spreadsheet of the comparison between the disk usage (du -k)
> values of v1.2 and v2
, like
repository/org/codehaus/castor/castor
which would show us any growth between Castor 0.9.5.3 to 1.0.5.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Here is a spreadsheet of the comparison between the disk usage (du -k)
> values of v1.2 and v2.0.
>
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZVJh
tables.
"repository/geronimo" is in the installed directory but not in my database.
I'll rebuild the table and see what comes out. Also, I'll 'map' the
"repository/geronimo" to "repository/org/apache/geronimo" so that the
table makes sense.
J
Matt, Jay,
The repository shifted from repository/geronimo to repository/o.a.g
from v1.2 onwards. We'd have to compare it against that directory to
get a good picture.. I added the same comments to your wiki page.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Installed+size+comparison+%281.
rote:
Looking at the time stamp of the error "Tue Jun 26 05:24:42 EDT
2007 " and the fact that the configs are being downloaded, it might be
necessary to ensure that mvn deploy finishes before the clock strikes
12! If not the snapshots are updated from the repo...
Thanks
Anita
--- P
On 6/21/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
working that way too.
All in all its been an excellent six month
This build was trying to a 'mvn deploy'. It was trying to publish the artifacts.
Last night's 11 pm (EST) build with 'mvn install' (no deploy) ran fine.
If anybody knows anything about it, chime in. Else I'm going to dig into this.
On another note, after we fix this, the artifacts on our repo
ily builds.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/22/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I think we should start running the entire testsuite. We have
quite a bit of tests there that should tell us if some basic
functionality is broken.
Jarek
On 6/22/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I was wondering if we should also publish the artifacts automatically
after a successful build. Looking at the apache-snapshots repo, the
last published snapshots are more than 2 weeks old.
So is it a good idea to publish snaps also after a successful build ?
If so, what is a good frequency ? Ni
Yayy !! Congrats Tim !
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/21/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congrats Tim!
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
> All,
>
> The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Tim McConnell has recently
> accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Tim has
> done some
Congrats Lin !
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/21/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations Lin!
Thanks for all your hard work!
On 6/21/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congrats Lin..
>
> On 6/22/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Congratulations Lin!!
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
The last time I spoke to Matt (Fri afternoon), he was going to release
it. Since he is on a "sorta" vacation, we should do it ourselves.
Either someone can guide me how to release it or release it themselves
for now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/18/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone
>> need the WS-MetaData spec. Originally this was approved except it
>> was missing the SCM tag. Prasad added that but this puts this
>> particular spec being released after their date. It would be
>> really helpful if we could approve this spec by tomorrow
>> (F
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/11/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd wi
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
ws-metadata will have a 3 digit
On 6/11/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section
Jacc: +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong
Deployment : +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong.
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun
explanatory comments in javax/se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503428
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-3234:
--
Completed: At revision: 546167
Please review and close if
201 - 300 of 1266 matches
Mail list logo
