Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Donald Woods as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Donald! Anita --- Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please join us in congratulating Donald Woods as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. Donald has contributed to Geronimo in many different areas; he has provided tons of patches, added functionality, testing and

Re: MEJB Security Alert

=host127.0.0.1/attribute /gbean /module -Donald Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: All, We have discovered a security vulnerability in Geronimo, where the management EJB (MEJB) allows unchallenged access to Geronimo internals. A temporary workaround is to make the following

Re: Standalone Geronimo 2.0.1 client

--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I have successfully used props.put(java.naming.provider.url, 127.0.0.1:4201) to run stand alone remote client to access MEJB. Should we be using ejbd://? We should, yes

Exception in thread Persistence Adaptor Task

I left geronimo overnight on a remote machine and forgot to shut it down. Next morning I found the following exception on the console. There were some exception in geronimo.log which I think are not related to this. Exception in thread Persistence Adaptor Task java.lang.NullPointerException

Re: Exception in thread Persistence Adaptor Task

--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 30, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I left geronimo overnight on a remote machine and forgot to shut it down. Next morning I found the following exception on the console. There were some exception in geronimo.log which I

Re: JSR77 monitoring subject

--- Viet Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anita, I am really happy that you looked at the monitoring stuff. I looked into your suggestion to use the JSR-77 stuff that you have been working on. It seems to be a convenient way of pulling data from an abstract object. Can you give me an

Re: Updating the WebSite for 2.0.1

I think we should exclude these packages (some coming from applications) from the docs: org.apache.geronimo.console.* checkbox colors compressionFilters dates error examples filters jsp2.examples jsp2.examples.el

Re: [Fwd: Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1]

? What is the file that needs to be replaced and where do I get it from? I don't see any on my repo with that timestamp. What other files need to be modified Cheers! Hernan Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: yup, copying alpha-1-20070806.170854-1.jar over

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3441) Server monitoring and management

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522323 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3441: -- Nice work! A graphical representation of the stats

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

+1 Thanks Anita --- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I think we are pretty

Re: automatic build of trunk

I would like to have trunk built 5 times a day. The release builds should be in addition to these. My +1 does not exactly convey this.. Thanks Anita --- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same 5 builds a day as current 2.0 ? +1

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3424) Fatal error in geronimo-service-builder during copy-xmlbeans-schemas on windows

: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: buildsystem Affects Versions: 2.1 Environment: windows Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha Priority: Minor The build for trunk rev 567880 is failing in geronimo

Re: automatic build of trunk

--- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same 5 builds a day as current 2.0 ? +1 Thanks Anita Or some 2.0 builds and some trunk builds ? Cheers Prasad On 8/20/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we setup automatic builds of trunk? I just discovered it doesn't build.

Re: project involvement

Sachin, Congratulations and best wishes on your wedding and on the new job. Anita --- Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello community members... I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in the project as of recent. As some have you may have known,

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. Thanks gents ! I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change log for the

Re: 2.0.1 Release plans

+1 Cheers! Anita --- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please consider the following change in 2.0.x, which allows Windows users to rebuild the server from source - GERONIMO-3410 added copy of jspc-maven-plugin-2.0-alpha-1-20070806.170854-1 to our build repo Revisions 565833,

Re: including maven descriptors in jar files

--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIUC we are currently leaving the maven descriptors out of all our artifacts due to the maven-jar-plugin configuration in the root pom. Also IIUC we only get in trouble from long paths from these maven descriptors for artifacts we unpack in

Re: svn commit: r566358 - in /geronimo/server/branches/2.0.1: ./ repository/ repository/org/codehaus/ repository/org/codehaus/mojo/ repository/org/codehaus/mojo/jspc/ repository/org/codehaus/mojo/jspc

THANKS!!! :) Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: hogstrom Date: Wed Aug 15 15:21:13 2007 New Revision: 566358 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=566358 Log: Fix from branches/2.0 that allows Windows users to compile the server. Added:

Re: Geronimo 2.0 Release suspended due to security issue found before release

+1 to option #2 Cheers! Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Earlier today one of the Geronimo committers discovered a bug in the command line deployer where a null user / password on the deployer command line will allow a user to deploy modules to a 2.0 server.

Re: [Fwd: Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1]

we release 2.0.1? -Donald Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I have not been so lucky. I have tried branches/2.0.0 also. I have tried deleting org.codehaus.mojo.jspc and ant from .m2 repo without any success (The trunk builds fine). Thanks Anita --- Vamsavardhana Reddy

Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1

On 8/10/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not been so lucky. I have tried branches/2.0.0 also. I have tried deleting org.codehaus.mojo.jspc and ant from .m2 repo without any success (The trunk builds fine). Thanks Anita --- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL

Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1

, but from branches\2.0.0. If that still counts as if I built from src zip... I have not run into this problem. I have tried after removing jspc-compiler-tomcat6-2.0-alpha-1.jar from my M2REPO so that it downloads a fresh. --vamsi On 8/9/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

building geronimo-2.0-rc1

Is anyone else seeing this in geronimo-welcome.. I am building from http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-src.zip Thanks Anita Downloading: http://repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/jspc/jspc-compiler

Re: Dependency resolution for SNAPSHOT versions

I have a serious issue with maven's snapshot handling. IMNSHO, I do not like the fact that our .m2 repo is littered with timestamped SNAPSHOTs. If my build is using SNAPSHOTs, all I want is the latest version. For anything else I would specify a TS snapshot, which should get downloaded in

Re: source jars for release do not include legal files

May be I am missing something. But the files geronimo-kernel-2.0-sources.jar and geronimo-kernel-2.0.jar have License.txt and Notice.txt files at meta-inf. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/geronimo-2.0-rc1/org/apache/geronimo/modules/geronimo-kernel/2.0/ Does the verification tool look in

Re: Specs jars have not been rsynch'ed

It appears that the metadata has been updated to show that the jar is released. But the jars themselves are not there! http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec/maven-metadata.xml Thanks Anita --- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Prasad,

Re: Specs jars have not been rsynch'ed

Great!!! Thanks Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now all the jars are there. We are good to go. Cheers Prasad On 8/8/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the metadata has been updated to show that the jar is released. But the jars

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release

I was trying to build 2.0-rc1 using http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-src.zip It is not a biggie but if txmanager was independently released and available on central, it would have been nice. Thanks Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0 (rc1) Release

2) org.apache.geronimo.components:geronimo-transaction:jar:2.0.1 - required artifact is missing. Thanks Anita --- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was trying to build 2.0-rc1 using http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-src.zip

Re: xml-apis dependency in branches\2.0.0\pom.xml

The xml-apis is not used by tomcat6-builder any more. Yes this can be removed. Thanks Anita --- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see the following xml-fragment in pom.xml in branches\2.0.0 !-- This will go away when we move to tomcat6 -- dependency

Re: 2.0 release status

--- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is crude!! First I ran the build on modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder with IBMJDK1.5.0 with tests turned off to be able to build the module. Then I ran the build (not a clean build) with SunJDK1.5.0 with tests on and the tests passed!!

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful for Revision: 562977

Isn't this build supposed to be building trunk? If yes, it should build 2.1-SNAPSHOTs and not 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT? I do not see any point in building 2.0.1-SNAPSHOTs. Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 562974 Geronimo Revision: 562977 built with tests skipped See

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.2

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the Genesis release of 1.2. At this location you will find a tar ball with the repository and related artifacts that will be released. http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/genesis-rc1 Branch with source is

Re: [VOTE] Release TxManager 2.0

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Please take a peek at the jar files for the txManagr components that David Jencks had busted out earlier. A tar ball can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0-rc1/ [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1 and geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1

+1 it would be nice to not include .staleFile in geronimo-schema-*-sources.jar in future. Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4-1.2 -- geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1 The

[VOTE : DISCUSS] Release Genesis 1.2

I would like to know why we do not use a single jdk version for all default configurations. The maven-compiler and maven-idea plugins use 1.4 whereas maven-javadoc plugin uses 1.5. Thanks Anita

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet

I was looking at the schemas included in the servlet specs jar: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1/src/main/schema/ Why are the following not included? javaee_5.xsd javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd Why is j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd

Re: [VOTE: DISCUSS] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet

Resending with the correct subject line.. Anita --- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking at the schemas included in the servlet specs jar: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1/src/main/schema/ Why are the following

Re: svn commit: r561027 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-tomcat6/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/tomcat/connector: BaseHttp11ConnectorGBean.java ConnectorGBean.java

We could use that script to set svn:eol-style=native... Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jgenender Date: Mon Jul 30 09:06:27 2007 New Revision: 561027 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=561027 Log: Fix maxThreads issue Modified:

Re: svn commit: r561104 - /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-tomcat6/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/tomcat/connector/BaseHttp11ConnectorGBean.java

FYI: This is the relevant change: +public boolean isStatisticsProvider() { +return true; +} Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: akulshreshtha Date: Mon Jul 30 13:19:14 2007 New Revision: 561104 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=561104 Log:

Re: svn commit: r561104 - /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-tomcat6/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/tomcat/connector/BaseHttp11ConnectorGBean.java

in TomcatContainer.java? public boolean isStatisticsProvider() { return false; // todo: return true once stats are integrated } -Donald Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: FYI: This is the relevant change: +public boolean isStatisticsProvider() { +return true; +} Thanks

Re: Change in WebModule interface

+1 Thanks Anita --- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My +1 on this...this made things *much* easier and in more complex configurations, its much more accurate. Jeff David Jencks wrote: I've been talking with jgenender on IRC a bit about the former getURLFor method in web

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1293) Provide tomcat statistics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-1293: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0) 2.1 Provide tomcat

Re: xmlbeans compile failed error

are getting downloaded in an online build? thanks david jencks On Jul 24, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Is anyone else seeing this on the trunk? Time to build schema type system: 1.032

Re: Problem with downloading dependencies during plugin installation

The repo contains commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/jar. This is the version that should be specified in the plugin not SNAPSHOT. Thanks Anita --- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to install a plugin which has a dependency on commonj/sdo-

OpenEJB for trunk

We need OpenEJB that uses 2.1-SNAPSHOT version Of Geronimo. I am seeing this in offline build: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-axis:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT 2) org.apache.openejb:openejb-axis:jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT 3)

Re: OpenEJB for trunk

older version of Geronimo 2.0-SNAPSHOT or 2.0 (if we release g-transaction and g-connector). Thanks Anita thanks david jencks On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: We need OpenEJB that uses 2.1-SNAPSHOT version Of Geronimo. I am seeing this in offline build: Path

geronimo-schema-j2ee-1.4 jar

The 1.1-SNAPSHOT version of geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 jar is still using xbeans-2.0.0. Are there any plans to change this? Thanks Anita [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. Downloading: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ger

xmlbeans compile failed error

Is anyone else seeing this on the trunk? Time to build schema type system: 1.032 seconds Time to generate code: 0.25 seconds C:\anita\geronimo\g2.0\modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder\target\generated-sources\xm

Re: Tomcat connectors

+1 Thanks Anita --- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really think the ability to use these 2 connectors is very important for the 2.0 release and I would like to put these in. If there are no objections, I would like this to be a part of the 2.0 release.

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2607) GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514836 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2607: -- Reapplied rev 499201. As before all operations

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2607) GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2607. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 Fixed in rev 558235

Re: 2.0 Release - Branching on Monday July 23rd around 0900 ET

I would like to commit this patch tonight (10.00 p.m. EST) and hope that nothing breaks this time... :).

Re: Should we cancel 1.2?

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. Also the changes reuired to go from 1.x to 1.2.x are much less that to 2.0.x. Since 1.x isn't really mantained anymore, due to build system insanity... Having a 1.2 would be good for folks that need a

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 550730

Looking at the time stamp of the error Tue Jun 26 05:24:42 EDT 2007 and the fact that the configs are being downloaded, it might be necessary to ensure that mvn deploy finishes before the clock strikes 12! If not the snapshots are updated from the repo... Thanks Anita --- Prasad Kashyap

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Lin Sun as our newest committer

Congratulations Lin! Anita --- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our midst. Lin Sun has been active on the Web Services integration for Geronimo for quite some time and has accepted our invitation to join the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Tim McConnell as our newest committer

Congratulations Tim! Anita --- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Tim McConnell has recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Tim has done some great work in 2.0 with regards to annotation

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Successful for Revision: 549821

+1 Writing from the other coast... Anita --- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 22, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: I was wondering if we should also publish the artifacts automatically after a successful build. Looking at the apache-snapshots repo, the last

Re: Build problems on 2.0M6

--- Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, After downloading the copy of 2.0M6 that's in the repo and attempting a build, I am getting some errors pertaining to maven being unable to locate http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/plugins/car-maven

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2

+1 Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly. Something odd with

Re: svn commit: r546700 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/var/log/server-log4j.properties

Is this necessary on trunk? It has been fixed in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3178 Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Tue Jun 12 18:44:07 2007 New Revision: 546700 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=546700 Log: Merge fix from

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata

+1 Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th

Re: Build failure Error parsing web.xml for .

I can reproduce this on win XP. If I build geronimo-ldap-demo 3 times w/o clean, I get 3 copies of web-app!!! Thanks Anita --- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you mvn clean before rebuilding? I'm still seeing weird behavior from the latest jspc-maven-plugin on Windows and

Re: Build failure Error parsing web.xml for .

, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I can reproduce this on win XP. If I build geronimo-ldap-demo 3 times w/o clean, I get 3 copies of web-app!!! Thanks Anita --- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you mvn clean before rebuilding? I'm still seeing

Re: Build failure Error parsing web.xml for .

On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I am attaching jspweb.xml (2 web-apps) from the target directory and web.xml (3 web-apps) from target/geronimo-ldap-demo-2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/web.xml. Thanks Anita --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you please

Re: svn commit: r544258 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/applications: console/geronimo-console-framework/ console/geronimo-console-standard/ geronimo-ca-helper/ geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ ge

FYI: In early days of M2 build the plugin did look for this string. It changed some time before Jan 2007. All the wars here have been built using /web-app as the inject string.

Re: svn commit: r544258 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/applications: console/geronimo-console-framework/ console/geronimo-console-standard/ geronimo-ca-helper/ geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ ge

Donald, If you add the configuration and the fragment comment, can you reproduce the error? Do you see the error mentioned in this thread or a NCDFE o.a.AnnotationProcessor. Thanks Anita --- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strange, I don't understand why we're seeing inconsistent

Re: svn commit: r544258 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/applications: console/geronimo-console-framework/ console/geronimo-console-standard/ geronimo-ca-helper/ geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ ge

FWIW, I am using windows XP, Sun JDK-1.5.0_11 and maven 2.0.6. Yesterday I hit 2 problems which went away after cleaning up relevant parts of .m2 repo (mvn-jspc-plugin and o.a.g.applications). I have not been able to reproduce it today with or w/o inject string. Thanks Anita I'd really like to

Re: svn commit: r544258 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/applications: console/geronimo-console-framework/ console/geronimo-console-standard/ geronimo-ca-helper/ geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-examples/ ge

It would be interesting to know if all four error cases did a partial build (i.e. application, config, assembly) without mvn -N from the top directory. Thanks Anita --- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know of four developers that hit the error, but don't understand why everyone

GBeanInfoBuilder [was Re: svn commit: r499201 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-kernel/src: main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/runtime/ test/java/org/a

this behavior. Any objections? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are not doing this at present. Please see: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r499201---in--geronimo-server-trunk-modules-geronimo-kernel-src%3A-main-java-org-apache-geronimo-gbean--main

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

yup. Thanks Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe Anita's multiple instances work is now closed and has gone in M6. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011 I'm editing the release notes to affect this change. Cheers Prasad On 6/1/07, Hernan Cunico

Re: svn commit: r543910 - in /geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M6: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-framework/ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/geronimo-ca-helper/ appl

Does include/exclude not work? http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#What%20is%20the%20POM? plugins plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-...-plugin/artifactId . .

Re: strange build error

of those suse developers. Don. On 5/28/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 28, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Kevan, Thanks for the hint. I was using jdk1.5.0_11. I have gone back

Re: strange build error

Kevan, Thanks for the hint. I was using jdk1.5.0_11. I have gone back to JDK_1.5.0_8 and upgraded to SUSE 10.2. The build is happy now.. Thanks Anita --- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 27, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: I am seeing this error on SUSE 9.2

Re: strange build error

--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 28, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Kevan, Thanks for the hint. I was using jdk1.5.0_11. I have gone back to JDK_1.5.0_8 and upgraded to SUSE 10.2. The build is happy now.. Hmm. Well, if there's an issue with 1.5.0_11

strange build error

I am seeing this error on SUSE 9.2... The build on Win XP works fine. Has any one used SUSE 9.2? Thanks Anita --- T E S T S --- Running

Re: svn commit: r541850 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty6: JettyManagerImpl.java connector/JettyConnector.java

AJP* classes are not included in jetty-6.1 jar like their earlier counterparts in jetty5. Are they going to be included soon? I do see a org.mortbay.jetty.ajp at http://www.mortbay.org/apidocs/index.html. Thanks Anita --- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This might be a bit misleading

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3190) ports 6882 2001 never change with portOffset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-3190: Assignee: Anita Kulshreshtha ports 6882 2001 never change

Re: Running multiple instances of geronimo

! Hernan Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: --- Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please feel free to document the evolving steps and issues in the wiki here: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/multiple-repositories-and-server-instances.html I am thinking about creating

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2773) cannot create a new jetty http connector from console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-2773: Assignee: Anita Kulshreshtha cannot create a new jetty http connector

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2773) cannot create a new jetty http connector from console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499092 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2773: -- Viet, Thanks for the patch! AJP Connector is not yet

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3190) ports 6882 2001 never change with portOffset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499109 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3190: -- This issue was fixed recently. Which rev. are you

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-2773) cannot create a new jetty http connector from console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha resolved GERONIMO-2773. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-M6 Patch applied, rev 541850

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2775) Enabling web statistics collection for jetty fails from the admin console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498055 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2775: -- you should not need to add dependency on geronimo

Re: svn commit: r536445 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/configs: client-system/pom.xml j2ee-system/pom.xml transformer-agent/pom.xml

Just curious Why was the main class org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon? we have not been using it for a while. Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Wed May 9 00:08:07 2007 New Revision: 536445 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=536445 Log:

Re: Naming the servers

--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sounds reasnaonable and it would make life easier with a README.txt in ./instances to help people get going. Also, leaving the default geronimo single server in $G/var makes sense as priori users won't have to search where things are.

Re: Naming the servers

--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 5:10 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sounds reasnaonable and it would make life easier with a README.txt in ./instances to help people get going. Also, leaving

Re: Naming the servers

or just the default one? -Donald Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 4, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Also, has the geronimo-maven-plugin been updated to handle this change? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO

How do we build Geronimo?

Hi All, We all have our own favorite way of building Geronimo. But how TCK builds Geronimo affects us all. It would benefit us all to know how the incremental changes are built in TCK. It is reasonable to assume that for every minor change TCK does/can not build from an empty .m2 repo. I am

Re: Naming the servers

--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 4, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Also, has the geronimo-maven-plugin been updated to handle this change? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011#action_12493721 If someone is aware of anything else that

Re: svn commit: r535158 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-jee5/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-minimal/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-je

The other culprit could be online build. The latest geronimo SNAPSHOTs were published on April 24th. In an online build, you can never be certain that you are using your local copy. Thanks Anita Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe, Could you please rename the 'var' to varx

Re: Naming the servers

I have committed changes in rev 535158. The name of the default instance is now 'geronimo0', i.e. its 'var' is at geronimo0/var. This has been tested only on windows. I do not expect any problems with this change.. In case of a problem, creating an empty var/temp should help. Thanks Anita

Re: Naming the servers

folder and seems more like a typo error to me. What about just geronimo-default, or default-instance, or just default? Or perhaps an instances folder, with geronimo0 inside. I just have an issue with geronimo0 as a root folder. -sachin On May 4, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3011) Adjust port configuration for running multiple instances of geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493721 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011: -- rev 534454 Use relative java.io.tmpdir

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3011) Adjust port configuration for running multiple instances of geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-3011. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5) 2.0

Re: svn commit: r535158 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-jee5/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-minimal/src/main/assembly/ assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-je

Joe, Could you please rename the 'var' to varx and run another instance of geronimo in your current server image. If you can, it means tck setup is setting some property (most probably o.a.g.server.dir) to GHOME, an absolute path. This needs to be fixed. I will be offline for the evening and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3123) Create a template/var directory for creating additional instances of geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493848 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3123: -- Some clarifications- 1. template/var does not cause

Re: svn commit: r534454 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/bin/ maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mavenplugins/

--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 2, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Before rev533500, if the server was started from the scripts, java.io.tmpdir was resolved to GHOME/var/temp (not relative to an instance). If it was started using java -jar, it used the system

Re: svn commit: r534454 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/bin/ maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mavenplugins/

Before rev533500, if the server was started from the scripts, java.io.tmpdir was resolved to GHOME/var/temp (not relative to an instance). If it was started using java -jar, it used the system default temp. The new behavior will allow each instance to have its own temp, i.e. 1. If

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >