On 7/30/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/30/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26,
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/30/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
A WAR plan creator sounds like useful capability in its own right.
I don't see any reason why it couldn't be provided stand alone. If
this capability was committed in trunk, provided useful capability,
and had low risk for causing other
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console
in G 2.0 where we can include the portlets (for e.g., the
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
Sounds good! A tech preview with all these new goodies would be great, it will
definitively drag users' attention, and if we hook them to their own wiki pages
it would be even greater.
Depending on the number of portlets we have (or may have) we may actually want
to create a separate Tech
I am excited ;-) with the opportunity that is opening up for my new portlet
to get included in G2.0.
I will see if I can wrap up auto-handling of security configuration for
web-apps by Monday.
- Shiva
On 7/27/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good! A tech preview with all
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in
G 2.0 where we can include the portlets (for e.g., the Create
Plan portlet Shiva is working on. See https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254) for which
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
2.0where we can include the portlets (for
e.g., the Create Plan portlet Shiva is working on. See
I kinda like the idea. Each such portlet should have a link to it's
own wiki page which will allow user feedback.
I wonder if we can even take it one further, by having a wiki page for
some of our existing heavy-weight portlets (eg. wizards). The user can
blog their feedbacks which do not
I kinda like this idea too. It is always great to get users' feedback.
If we decide to do it, I think we want to make it very clear it is
tech preview on the pages, otherwise the users may have a different
expectation.
Lin
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview
On 7/27/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kinda like this idea too. It is always great to get users' feedback.
If we decide to do it, I think we want to make it very clear it is
tech preview on the pages, otherwise the users may have a different
expectation.
I agree. Along with
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
2.0where we can include the portlets (for
e.g., the Create Plan portlet Shiva is working on. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254) for which user feedback
will play a great role in improving those further.
15 matches
Mail list logo
