I've upgraded CXF and myfaces in 2.1 branch per Frank's suggestion.
-Jack
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:25 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Will it be possible to upgrade the openejb version to 3.0.2 (to include
the fix for
of the new EJB 3.1 spec, and that Geronimo 2.2 already has it.
I'm trying to upgrade Derby to 10.5.3.0_1 now.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27448910.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive
://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27451238.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
There have been requests to upgrade AXIS and MyFaces.
Upgrading CXF and Derby sound like good candidates, too.
Not sure why we need to upgrade ANT or SLF4J, especially if these are
tied into gshell and would require other upgrades.
-Donald
On 2/4/10 2:55 AM, frapien wrote:
Hi Jack,
i
On Feb 3, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Will it be possible to upgrade the openejb version to 3.0.2 (to
include the fix for OPENEJB-1005)? This is needed for the Tuscany
plugin being developed for Geronimo that is right now using G 2.1.4.
Right, there's been a 3.0.2
contain security fixes. This is always tricky, as we ran into junit
failures and TCK failures when trying to upgrade some components in
2.1.4 (like Jetty)
-Donald
On 2/2/10 2:45 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi
)
-Donald
On 2/2/10 2:45 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release from 2.1 branch.
If no one volunteer, I would also like to be a release
to its latest release 6.0.24...
Not sure whether people are also interested in upgrading Derby to 10.5.x.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27443399.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive
I just upgraded 2.1.x to use OpenJPA 1.2.2. Our next release (1.2.3) is
tentatively planned for sometime in March, but will depend upon if we
have enough integrated patches to justify another release that soon.
-Donald
On 2/3/10 4:04 PM, frapien wrote:
Tomcat 6.0.24, new release of tranql
when trying to upgrade some components in
2.1.4 (like Jetty)
-Donald
On 2/2/10 2:45 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new
in the new release too.
And also probably upgrade Tomcat to its latest release 6.0.24...
Not sure whether people are also interested in upgrading Derby to 10.5.x.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27443399.html
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27443399.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Best Regards,
Delos
-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27448910.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release from 2.1 branch.
If no one volunteer, I would also like to be a release manager for
2.1.5 release.
Since
Initial Japanese translation (Kan Ogawa Kan Ogawa)
GERONIMO-4688 hardcode port in plan.xml of plugin farming(Shawn
Jiang Shawn Jiang)
GERONIMO-4624 Improve deployment plan documentation (Unassigned
Kevan Miller)
2010/2/2 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo
Jiang Shawn Jiang)
GERONIMO-4624 Improve deployment plan documentation (Unassigned
Kevan Miller)
2010/2/2 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I
)
GERONIMO-4624 Improve deployment plan documentation (Unassigned
Kevan Miller)
2010/2/2 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release
Hi,
what problems would current 2.1.4 users have if they'd upgrade to 2.2
instead of 2.1.5?
What incompatabilities are there?
Juergen
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Prepare-Geronimo-2.1.5-release--tp27416505s134p27417569.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo
Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release from 2.1 branch.
If no one volunteer, I would also like to be a release manager for
2.1.5 release.
Since branch 2.1.x does not have
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Juergen Weber wrote:
what problems would current 2.1.4 users have if they'd upgrade to 2.2
instead of 2.1.5?
What incompatabilities are there?
Upgrading to 2.2 is certainly an option. I don't know of any problems. However,
there are some major upgrades in 2.2
have newer releases available which
contain security fixes. This is always tricky, as we ran into junit
failures and TCK failures when trying to upgrade some components in
2.1.4 (like Jetty)
-Donald
On 2/2/10 2:45 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi
deployment plan documentation
(Unassigned Kevan Miller)
2010/2/2 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release from 2.1 branch
[DISCUSS] Prepare Geronimo 2.1.5 release?
Hi,
We've had 80 more important fixes since 2.1.4 release and should get
them out to our users.
So I think we can start a new release from 2.1 branch.
If no one volunteer, I would also like to be a release manager for
2.1.5 release.
Since branch 2.1.x
23 matches
Mail list logo
