It looks like this did indeed fall completely by the wayside. I think
at the bare minimum we should get a 1.0 release binary put out for this.
Donald, are you still willing to push that? If not, I am willing to
take that over... can I even do that without being PMC? If I can, I'll
figure
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donald, are you still willing to push that? If not, I am willing to
take that over... can I even do that without being PMC? If I can, I'll
figure out what needs to be done and such.
Yes, you can.
Jacek
--
Jacek
What happened to this vote? I checked the tags and the code was never moved
over. Did this pass? Do we have an official binary I can link to on the
wiki docs?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 4:52 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
The .project
What are they .project and .classpath files? They don't have ASL license
headers...
I assume JBoss is a trademarked name. We are using it in some file names and
in some file contents. Are we handling this correctly? I don't know the
answer off hand.
There was a recent discussion about aggregating
Strange. In
j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-deployable.ziphttp://people.apache.org/~dwoods/releases/j2g-1.0.0/j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-deployable.zipthe
LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files are write-only (i.e. I have to chmod +r to
read them). I haven't tried building yet. Is this an artifact of
The .project and .classpath files are used when the plugins are loaded
in Eclipse IDE.You are right they don't have ASL license headers
but I don't see license headers associated with these files normally.
The files in the geronimo eclipse plugin don't have ASL license
headers either. Also,
hmm... this may be something unique on Donald's build machine or a
non-windows machine. I don't see this prob on my winxp machine.
Lin
On Nov 6, 2007 6:40 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. In j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-deployable.zip
the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files are
I built it on Linux (SLED10). Will have to take a look
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
hmm... this may be something unique on Donald's build machine or a
non-windows machine. I don't see this prob on my winxp machine.
Lin
On Nov 6, 2007 6:40 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange.
No, the reorg was for post 1.0.0 discussion.
The whole idea, is to get J2G out there as-is and get some real-world
user feedback on it
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
The .project and .classpath files are used when the plugins are loaded
in Eclipse IDE.You are right they don't have ASL
Starting discussion thread for Vote thread at -
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-J2G-1.0.0-RC1-tf4740253s134.html
-Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
10 matches
Mail list logo
