Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Donald Woods wrote: +1 Let me know if you need help releasing them Donald, That would be great. --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:41 PM, David Jencks wrote: Would anyone object if I modified it to use the maven-remote- resources plugin? Maybe. I think the NOTICE files that it generates are messy (even the new version), misleading or confusing, and sometimes incorrect. Since I'm the one that complains about it, I'll take a look at it to see if can be customized to address my issues. May need some help from you or Jason Dillon... --kevan
[DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
On Nov 27, 2007 9:52 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? +1 Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
Let the release begin. If your looking for someone to goat herd it I can help you with that . On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
Kevan Miller wrote: Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan I say let's get it started. I'd be glad to help too ... it would be good for me to get my feet wet with this. Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
+1 Let me know if you need help releasing them -Donald Kevan Miller wrote: Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. +1 Anybody have pending changes? No, I do not have any pending changes. Thanks Anita Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
Would anyone object if I modified it to use the maven-remote- resources plugin? thanks david jencks On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] Release geronimo-txmanager 2.1
+1 Jay Kevan Miller wrote: Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and geronimo-connector jars). TCK results look good and I haven't heard of any issues. So, it seems like a good time to start prepping for a release. Anybody have pending changes? Any objections to start working on a release? --kevan
