Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-13 Thread Kevan Miller
Apologies for such a late response. This thread came out while I was on vacation and got buried by a lot of other things... This is a good list. Comments, below. On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:12 PM, David Jencks wrote: Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-04 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 9/3/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aighty? Done. Thanks! Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-03 Thread Jason Dillon
On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote: Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to write actual sentences about all of

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Oh, one more thing which I think is also critical path for the health of the server and its community... LOGGING REFORM We've talked about this here and there, most folks agree we need to reform our logging usage... but so far its yet to happen. It is a fairly simple task IMO, but its

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-03 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1 I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update this puppy... IMO this type of information is better captured in a wiki page, though its

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-03 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Thanks for the CWiki ... On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1 I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update this puppy...

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-02 Thread Gianny Damour
On 31/08/2007, at 10:12 AM, David Jencks wrote: Clustering IIUC we have a lot of partial clustering solutions. For instance there's WADI, native tomcat clustering, a terracotta integration, and IIUC Jeff has been working on a clustering solution (my apologies if I left any out). I'd

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-02 Thread Karl Pauls
Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to write actual sentences about all of this I'd probably never send the email so this

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-02 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 9/2/07, Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but to be honest I'd need a lot of support to get it done (mentor?). As I said previously on this list, I'd be willing to help. Alas, my time is limited as well but I can provide help and insides where necessary. Hi Karl, Oh, I see a mentor

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-09-02 Thread Karl Pauls
On 9/2/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/07, Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but to be honest I'd need a lot of support to get it done (mentor?). As I said previously on this list, I'd be willing to help. Alas, my time is limited as well but I can provide help and

Re: [Discuss] What next?

2007-08-31 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 8/31/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to write actual sentences about all of

[Discuss] What next?

2007-08-30 Thread David Jencks
Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try to write actual sentences about all of this I'd probably never send the email so this is