+1 Confluence
I'm now completely dependent on ${snippet} as well as loving its
general ease of use.
On 20 Jan 2006, at 14:36, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some
On 23 Jan 2006, at 03:18, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'm also curious about how in-code documentation can be integrated,
via something like Doxygen or -ish.
See the ${snippet} macro for how to combine the wiki with source code
or test cases etc. We've used this massively throughout various
You know where the source is for the updated snippet library that is
use on http://wiki.opensymphony.com? Its got some integrated caching/
refreshing stuff. Not sure that is needed anymore since you could
just use {cache}, and the ?refresh=true to reload.
I played with the snippet a long
2006/1/23, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't understand - The need for documentation under source control is
important, and we need to find a solution that ensure that is possible.
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of
- reasonably easy to use
-
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/1/23, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't understand - The need for documentation under source control is
important, and we need to find a solution that ensure that is possible.
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of
- reasonably
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of
- reasonably easy to use
- versionable
- able to be used offline
- extractable into an open and transformable format for reuse
Wikis that I've used fail on #2, #3 and #4.
Confluence (as well as other mature wikis) provide #2, and
[ X ] Confluence
Cheers
PrasadOn 1/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of - reasonably easy to use - versionable - able to be used offline - extractable into an open and transformable format for reuse
Wikis that I've used fail
Jason Dillon wrote:
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of
- reasonably easy to use
- versionable
- able to be used offline
- extractable into an open and transformable format for reuse
Wikis that I've used fail on #2, #3 and #4.
Confluence (as well as other mature
[+1] Confluence
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
I don't understand - The need for documentation under source control is
important, and we need to find a solution that ensure that is possible.
I think that a documentation system should be a combination of
- reasonably easy to use
- versionable
- able to be used offline
- extractable into an
2006/1/20, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[X ] Confluence
[ ] MoinMoin wiki
[ ] Other (explain)
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
This is not a big deal IMO... if we use Confluence, we import the old
Moin content in its own space. Then shutdown the gerinomo Moin
instance, then migrate content to the main space.
I don't believe that anyone wants to use both.
--jason
On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:57 AM, toby cabot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at 14h00 UTC on 27 January 2006. At
that point, a
[X] Confluence
- sachin
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this
[X] Confluence
On 1/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working documentation for Apache Geronimo should be kept in
[+0] Confluence
[+1] MoinMoin wiki
[ ] Other (explain)
I don't really care except that I know MoinMoin markup quite well and
am newer to Confluence. :) But also, as I
[x] Confluence
From an end-user point of view I think it's more organized and easy to navigate.
From a contributers point of view I think there is already a good skeleton in place for anybody interested to fill in the gaps.
Regards,
Rajith
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Working documentation for Apache Geronimo should be kept in
[X] Confluence
[ ] MoinMoin wiki
[ ] Other (explain)
I haven't written any Geronimo documentation yet, but if I eventually
do, I'd prefer Confluence, primarily because of how easy it makes it to
organize,
[ X ] Confluence
Joe
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at
+1 Confluence
-dain
On Jan 20, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote
[X] Confluence
The integration w/ Jira is great!
Regards,
Alan
+1 Confluence
David Jencks
On Jan 20, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems,
On 1/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one
[ X ] Confluence
Cheers!
Hernan
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:30:59AM -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:
But also, as I understand it, even if we
choose Confluence we need a different Confluence installation which
someone TBD needs to take charge of and then all the content needs to
be moved?
Excellent point. It's more important to
+1 Confluence
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at 14h00 UTC
+0
I think the quality of the documentation is more
important than the documentation tool.
But, if Confluence gives us features that would dramatically
improve the documentation by all means change.
However, assuming there's no easy way to slurp the existing
pages into Confluence, I'd
+1 Confluence
Gianny
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at
+1 for Confluence
--jason
I'm not sure that everyone knows about some of the nicer features of
Confluence...
* WYSIWYG Editor
* Rich integration with JIRA (issue lists and embedded portlets)
* Rich integration with Groovy/Jython/BeanShell SQL
* Simple page linking... no need for *ugly* CamelCase
* Integrated
30 matches
Mail list logo
