Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
+1 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:01 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks -- Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
Build looks fine my +1 On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy c1vams...@gmail.comwrote: +1 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:01 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks -- Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
+1 -Donald On 5/5/10 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
+1 david jencks On May 5, 2010, at 4:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
[RESULT] [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
Vote passes with 5 PMC +1 and one other +1 and no other votes Rick McGuire Kevan Miller Vamsavardhana Reddy Donald Woods David Jencks and Ashish Jain I'll promote the staging repo... thanks david jencks On May 5, 2010, at 4:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good. I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency: Missing: -- 1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2 I'm -1 until this is resolved. --kevan On May 5, 2010, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good. I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency: Missing: -- 1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2 I'm -1 until this is resolved. I may have had a local maven configuration problem (i switch between a local nexus proxy and raw maven builds). Running a new test, now... --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good. I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency: Missing: -- 1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2 I'm -1 until this is resolved. Apologies, my mistake... Build looks good. Here's my +1. --kevan --kevan On May 5, 2010, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
Source builds cleanly, rat and ianal tests pass, Geronimo builds and works ok with this version in place. +1 On 5/5/2010 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
[VOTE] Geronimo jaspi component 1.1
Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component. The major changes to this release are: - packaged as an osgi bundle - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi. - dependencies upgraded to use bundleized dependencies. I spent some time trying to get the manifest entries to look reasonable to me. Since this is the first osgi release I put the package-version at 1.0. The import version ranges are _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy for everything except the self-imports which are [1.0,1.1). I suppose it would have been better to use this version range for the jaspic spec as well, but I didn't. There's always something. Maybe next time the maven-bundle-plugin will do this for us. Staging repo is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-012/ tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/jaspi/tags/geronimo-jaspi-1.1/ Vote open 72 hours [ ] +1 release this [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) thanks david jencks
