Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
isn't that still less than 24 hours? :) On Dec 7, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt -- Geir

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/6/05, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. +1 Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' The Castor Project http://www.castor.org/ Apache

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Sachin Patel
[X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 On 12/7/05 1:04 AM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 On 12/7/05, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 On 12/7/05 1:04 AM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ]

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-07 Thread Kevan Miller
+1On 12/7/05, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more time.Based on wildly popular feedback.Here is an alternatebranching proposal.[ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7[ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternativeMatt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-06 Thread Jan Bartel
+1 janb Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-06 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 :D Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-06 Thread David Jencks
+1 david jencks On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt

Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7

2005-12-06 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Matt Hogstrom wrote: [X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Jacek