[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3452:
-----------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 2.1
        Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.0.x)
                       2.0.2

Manu, can you set this to resolved or close it, since the fix went into OpenEJB?


> Stateless Session EJBs cannot contain a remove() method
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-3452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3452
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: OpenEJB
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.x, 2.1
>         Environment: Windows XP SP2
>            Reporter: Aman Nanner
>             Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.1
>
>
> We have a stateless session bean that contains a "remove(...)" method that 
> takes in a specific type of array as a parameter.  It seems that the 
> EJBObjectProxyHandler confuses this custom business method with the Entity 
> Bean "remove(...)" method.  Once the logic sees that a method called "remove" 
> is being called, it assumes that it is a "special" method instead of a 
> business method.  Here is a stack trace up to the point where this piece of 
> logic occurs:
> {panel}
> Thread [http-80-3] (Suspended)        
>       StatelessEjbObjectHandler(EjbObjectProxyHandler)._invoke(Object, Class, 
> Method, Object[]) line: 62      
>       StatelessEjbObjectHandler(BaseEjbProxyHandler).invoke(Object, Method, 
> Object[]) line: 320       
>       Jdk13InvocationHandler.invoke(Object, Method, Object[]) line: 49        
>       $Proxy173.remove(FcModelKey[]) line: not available      
>       FCRemoveTest.test() line: 75    
>       ....
> {panel}
> The following code in the EjbObjectProxyHandler looks up the name of the 
> method from the dispatch table and sees that it is a "special" method name.  
> However, this really only applies to Entity beans and not Session Beans.  
> Therefore, case 4 is executed, and the StatelessEjbObjectHandler.remove(...) 
> method is called, which is empty and only returns null.
> {code}
>             Integer operation = (Integer) dispatchTable.get(m.getName());
>             if (operation == null) {
>                 retValue = businessMethod(interfce, m, a, p);
>             } else {
>                 switch (operation.intValue()) {
>                     case 1:
>                         retValue = getHandle(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 2:
>                         retValue = getPrimaryKey(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 3:
>                         retValue = isIdentical(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 4:
>                         retValue = remove(interfce, m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 5:
>                         retValue = getEJBHome(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 6:
>                         retValue = getEJBLocalHome(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     default:
>                         throw new RuntimeException("Inconsistent internal 
> state");
>                 }
>             }
>             return retValue;
> {code}
> We have not run into this problem with JBoss and Weblogic.  I do not believe 
> having a method called "remove" on a Stateless Session bean is in violation 
> of any spec, so this should work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to