Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-31 Thread anita kulshreshtha
In M1 there was a way to say swallow ouput. I can not find a reference to it. But trying.. Thanks Anita --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how they were quiet before m2 with code like above in setUp(). --jason On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Jason Dillon

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-31 Thread Jason Dillon
Ya, I'm not sure that surefire has support for that :-( --jason On Aug 31, 2006, at 6:35 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: In M1 there was a way to say swallow ouput. I can not find a reference to it. But trying.. Thanks Anita --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
Um... looks like a few of these tests are explicitly enabling DEBUG and installing a ConsoleAppender... Logger.getRootLogger().addAppender(new ConsoleAppender(new PatternLayout(%p [%t] %m %n))); Logger.getRootLogger().setLevel(Level.DEBUG); I'm not sure how they were quiet before

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
This is fixed now... though it still spits out a few ERROR logs, which I am hoping are expected from the test... --jason On Aug 30, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Um... looks like a few of these tests are explicitly enabling DEBUG and installing a ConsoleAppender...

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks like there is more going on which is causing tests to use some additional configuration for tests... Specifically, looks like something else is installing a ConsoleAppender... as if I comment out the CONSOLE definition from logging-config, then I still get console output. I'm also

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Dain Sundstrom
You should be able to turn on debugging, add a break point in the logging code and see which test is causing the problem. -dain On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Looks like there is more going on which is causing tests to use some additional configuration for tests...

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
I think this is related to the custom log4j bits on geronimo-kernel, which most modules depend on. Modules that do not depend on geronimo- kernel, like geronimo-util and geronimo-activation behave as I would expect. I'm gonna dig into it more, and will probably add a custom sys prop to

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
Okay, I think I've found it... BootstrapLog4jLog and BootstrapJdk1.4Log both have static blocks that install logging configuration programatically. I'm going to add a new method to GeronimoLogging, which will check if this behavior is enabled or not: /** * Check if the Geronimo

Re: Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-29 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks like logging-config is not getting picked up as I had expected... going to need to write a custom goal that will install the logging configuration into target/test-classes so that it gets pick up first. --jason On 8/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats odd, because the

Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-28 Thread Jason Dillon
These tests make way... way to much noise. Anyone know how to make them shut up? --jason

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Not me. They were quiet before the m2 change but it looks like logging got turned up. -dain On Aug 28, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: These tests make way... way to much noise. Anyone know how to make them shut up? --jason

Re: Anyone know how to make the kernel tests be quiet?

2006-08-28 Thread Jason Dillon
Thats odd, because the default logging config is set to only allow WARN and ERROR to go to console, not DEBUG. Do these tests need to: GeronimoLogging.initialize(GeronimoLogging.INFO); Or something? --jason On Aug 28, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Not me. They were quiet