Hi,
I think that we should produce two artefacts as part of the assembly steps:
* geronimo-assembly-server: only the stuff for the server; and
* geronimo-assembly-deployer: only the stuff for the deployer.
This way is it more easy for end-users to understand what is actually
used by a geronimo
I totally agree with Gianny's suggestion.
From my personal experience, I have found that for a
newbie trying to differentiate between two could be
really difficult. So its better to produce two
artefacts for this.
Cheers,
Sandip
--- Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I think that we
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I think that we should produce two artefacts as part of the assembly steps:
* geronimo-assembly-server: only the stuff for the server; and
* geronimo-assembly-deployer: only the stuff for the deployer.
This way is it more easy for end-users to understand what is actually
