Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-04 Thread Gianny Damour
On 2/12/2004 11:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Great news. I suggest that we declare that we only officially support the 10g driver. Maybe add a wiki page with supported drivers. Good idea. This is in progress in here: http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Working_20with_20Enterprise_20JavaBeans

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-02 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Great news. I suggest that we declare that we only officially support the 10g driver. Maybe add a wiki page with supported drivers. -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Dec 1, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Gianny Damour wrote: On 2/12/2004 9:50 AM, Jeff

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-01 Thread Gianny Damour
Dain, Jeremy, thanks for your replies. Here is a short description of what I have so far understood about LOB manipulations: setBinaryStream setBinaryStream does work with Derby, MySQL and Oracle (except where the content is bigger than 4k). The JDBC specifications 3.0 mandate that the method

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-12-01 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Looks like it it time to implement some dialect specific back ends for TranQL. The original plan was to have an oracle specific sql generator to get around problems like blob insertion, blob updating, and differences in temporal types. -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-11-29 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, I am working on the support of Dependent Value Classes. The implementation is rather simple: if a binding is not explicitely defined for a CMP field class (see org.tranql.sql.jdbc.binding.BindingFactory) and if the class implements Serializable, then one assumes that

Re: BLOB manipulation - question

2004-11-29 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Nov 28, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, I am working on the support of Dependent Value Classes. The implementation is rather simple: if a binding is not explicitely defined for a CMP field class (see org.tranql.sql.jdbc.binding.BindingFactory) and if the

BLOB manipulation - question

2004-11-28 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, I am working on the support of Dependent Value Classes. The implementation is rather simple: if a binding is not explicitely defined for a CMP field class (see org.tranql.sql.jdbc.binding.BindingFactory) and if the class implements Serializable, then one assumes that the CMP field is a