Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-28 Thread Mark Struberg
yes, it has no effect on the users. Currently there are not many new features planned for MP-config.But we are discussing 2 new features in the ConfigJSR.So I assume that javax.config will have more features for now. LieGrue,strub On Friday, 27 October 2017, 21:54:58 GMT+2, Romain

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, would work and be saner that what i had in mind. In term of which one wraps the other I'm tempted to say javax.* will move slower than MP so I'd impl javax.* with MP but no strong opposition on the other side for now, doesn't impact the user anyway, right? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau |

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-27 Thread Mark Struberg
Maybe we can go yet another way.Take what we have right now (MicroProfile-API) and expose the JSR-382 functionality as wrapper in an additional module? It would also be possible to do it the other way around: have the core use javax.config.* and expose the MP apis in an additional module. I'd

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
is a copy-artifact with a relocation doable while 1:1? would avoid branches, otherwise we can need some common modules to avoid a headache when fixing something :s Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-27 17:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-27 Thread Mark Struberg
I thought about just providing another branch. One for MP, the other for the JSR. I expect MicroProfile to also switch to the JSR once it is finally released. I will try to clarify the relation in the next mp meeting. Until that we gonna impl both I'd say. In the future we might even provide an

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-27 Thread John D. Ament
As long as we don't lose support for MP Config in the process, I'm fine with it. John On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:06 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hi Mark, > > sounds like a good idea. > Happy to help if you wish > > JLouis > > Le jeu. 26 oct. 2017 à 21:46, Mark Struberg

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-26 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi Mark, sounds like a good idea. Happy to help if you wish JLouis Le jeu. 26 oct. 2017 à 21:46, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > The EG started working on JSR-382. > It seems that it will be based on the MicroProfile work. > We did just rename a few things back to

Re: Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, which source do you speak about - I'm confused by "xbean" part? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/config/trunk/ ? it is exactly that from the source and meta in the pom so not sure you even need to ask ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github |

Make geronimo/xbean config a JSR-382 impl?

2017-10-26 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks! The EG started working on JSR-382.It seems that it will be based on the MicroProfile work.We did just rename a few things back to javax.config.Funnily that's where it all started in early 2016 over here at Geronimo :) So I would love to start a 'javaConfig10' feature branch on the