Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-23 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. I seem to have missed it. Here's my +1 for purely historical purposes. (sorry Jason for having you kept

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-17 Thread Jason Dillon
Okay, next wednesday, the 23rd, ~midnight it is. I will send email that day in the afternoon and then before and after the move. --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:33 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Jason, I'd suggest Wednesday night midnight (Thursday morning 0001 PT) as most peeps will be

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-17 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Regards, Alan David Blevins wrote: +1, it's gotten a bit awkward the way we have it now. -David On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent.

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-17 Thread David Blevins
It works great. We've used it in the past for switching to pre- release branches, etc. -David On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Maybe... I've never used svn switch before... not sure I would trust it ;-) --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:01 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches toserver/*.This will make the top-level of our repository moreconsistent.Specifically, I think we should:svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/serversvn mv

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Jason Dillon
This is a simple change... but will have a large affect on developers, who will need to checkout again.When is a good time to implement this?--jasonOn Aug 15, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:+1On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk,

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Jason Dillon
Maybe... I've never used svn switch before... not sure I would trust it ;-)--jasonOn Aug 16, 2006, at 1:01 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a simple change... but will have a large affect on developers, who will need to checkout again.Maybe a svn

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny On 16/08/2006, at 11:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: +1...good first step Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn mkdir

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-16 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Jason, I'd suggest Wednesday night midnight (Thursday morning 0001 PT) as most peeps will be sleeping, getting ready to sleep or waking up and we have a Friday. I don't think there is ever going to be a universally good time. Next Wednesday would be my vote as I think 1.1.1 will be

Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread Jason Dillon
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tags

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread Aaron Mulder
Sounds OK to me, though I thought there had been some talk about something more like trunk/server trunk/other trunk/another server/branches server/tags other/branches other/tags another/branches another/tags Or something like that -- where all the trunks were together but all the branches and

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread Jason Dillon
I have not read anything to that affect... and would not recommend doing that. Top-level directories with the standard svn trunk, tags and branches is what I think will work out best for the long run. --jason On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Sounds OK to me, though I

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread David Jencks
On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: +1 to Jason's original proposal I agree david jencks -dain On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I have not read anything to that affect... and would not recommend doing that. Top-level directories with the standard svn

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1...good first step Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server svn mv

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread David Blevins
+1, it's gotten a bit awkward the way we have it now. -David On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

2006-08-15 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 8/15/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent. Specifically, I think we should: svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server svn mv