On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Hey David,
I'd like to get this process rolling for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT and 1.2-
SNAPSHOT. Are these builds running on GBuild? Can we get multiple
people (not just you) to help maintain this?
I've got to submit a patch for this. I'll put that tog
Hey David,
I'd like to get this process rolling for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT and 1.2-
SNAPSHOT. Are these builds running on GBuild? Can we get multiple
people (not just you) to help maintain this?
--kevan
On May 10, 2006, at 9:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates un
The problem is being caused by Codehaus being down. I've applied the
OpenEJB patch from Jira 1434 to the version of OpenEJB on Continuum.
This means the build work. We should know shortly...
--kevan
On May 17, 2006, at 4:10 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Build's busted. three days now.
On May 1
Build's busted. three days now.
On May 17, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hey !!! What happened to the builds that gbuild used to post daily to
the repository directory at
http://svn.apache.org/repository/geronimo/distribution ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/12/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTE
Hey !!! What happened to the builds that gbuild used to post daily to
the repository directory at
http://svn.apache.org/repository/geronimo/distribution ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/12/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 11, 2006, at 6:01 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> I agree with everyone e
On May 11, 2006, at 6:01 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I agree with everyone else that it is really great to have these
unstable builds being produced and posted on a regular basis! It
will help encourage users to pick up the latest more quickly and
provide us with quicker feedback.
Definitely a
On May 12, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Why not add a simple link to the unstable builds (or at least the
location of the most recent 1.1 build) on the Geronimo main
download page?
That'd be great, thanks!
This will encourage user participation and feedback for 1.1..
Defin
I think Joe has raised a valid point here... Providing ongoing unstable
builds is quite useful. However, if there is no simple link to them
from the Geronimo website then how will users find them?
Why not add a simple link to the unstable builds (or at least the
location of the most recent 1
I agree with everyone else that it is really great to have these
unstable builds being produced and posted on a regular basis! It will
help encourage users to pick up the latest more quickly and provide us
with quicker feedback.
How is it expected that users will find these unstable builds?
Cool stuff!!! long time needed :D
Thanks David
Cheers!
Hernan
David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further, I've
hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose Wednesday as
it gives developers a couple days into the week to try and get
Wonderful!
Thanks!!
david jencks
On May 10, 2006, at 6:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further,
I've hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose
Wednesday as it gives developers a couple days into the week to try
and
David,
This is excellent. I think the users will appreciate being able to see new items more quickly. Not
sure if this makes sense but you might do the build at 0300 PT. That way Aaron won't be up early
hammering the build :)
David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates
David,
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 10, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > Oh David.. this is really coool !
> >
> > Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
> >
> > Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied
> to
> > the revision
On May 10, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Oh David.. this is really coool !
Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied to
the revision number or the timestamp or such significant thing.
It is the svn revision numb
David,
Great job! We have been needing this for a while. Thanks for towing
the line on this.
Jeff
David Blevins wrote:
> All,
>
> I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further, I've
> hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose Wednesday as it
> gives developers
Oh David.. this is really coool !
Now explain the significance of 405734. :-)
Hope it's not some random number. It'd be nice if that was the tied to
the revision number or the timestamp or such significant thing.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 5/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Awesome! We'
Awesome! We've needed this for a while.
It would be great if we could auto link the build and the changelog
to the download site.
On May 10, 2006, at 9:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further,
I've hooked it up to run every Wednesda
All,
I've revived our script that creates unstable builds. Further, I've
hooked it up to run every Wednesday at 6am PST. I chose Wednesday as
it gives developers a couple days into the week to try and get
features in that they'd like people to try out. It also gives a
couple days in th
18 matches
Mail list logo
