Re: Spring cleaning
Jeremy Boynes wrote: Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? +1 (the first time I saw Spring in the subject, I thought about THE Spring and wondered when Jules would object :-)) Jacek
Re: Spring cleaning
A cleanup of http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/geronimo-spec/jars/ ? For example, is geronimo-spec-ejb-1.0-M1.jar really the EJB 1.0 spec or is it before our versioning scheme was sorted out. If it really is 1.0 then how does one easily find the source for it? What is the retention policy for release candidate JARs in the repository once we go to a formal release? John This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally. Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2005 01:34:30 AM: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
+1
Also if you have time... Grep the project.xml files and plan files to
see what ${.*_version} tags we are using and remove the unused ones
from etc/project.properties
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
On Apr 8, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some
of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to
propose a spring-cleaning exercise.
For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there
over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this
includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented
differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from
there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go
too).
There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system
modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce
clutter and footprint.
Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I
recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the
velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just
had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more
instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the
clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely.
Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up?
--
Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
+1 I think that the webdav stuff should go too. Thanks, Gianny On 9/04/2005 1:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
+1...great idea. Gianny Damour wrote: +1 I think that the webdav stuff should go too. Thanks, Gianny On 9/04/2005 1:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy -- Jeff Genender http://geronimo.apache.org
Spring cleaning
It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
Sounds good to me. Regards, Alan Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
+1 Regards, Hiram On Apr 8, 2005, at 11:34 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy
Re: Spring cleaning
+1 On Apr 8, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: It has been a very long time since we went around and cleaned up some of the things that seemed like good ideas at the time. I would like to propose a spring-cleaning exercise. For example, if we look in the sandbox we moved a lot of things there over a year ago on the basis that they might be useful later; this includes mail, remoting and explorer which have all been implemented differently in the trunk. I would suggest we remove everything from there except Gianny's webdav stuff (unless he thinks that should go too). There is also some utility stuff in the common, core and system modules that is not being used and which can be removed to reduce clutter and footprint. Finally, I'd like to revisit the dependencies we have. For example, I recently came across the case where we were using a RC version of the velocity jellybean but then they had cut the final release and we just had not upgraded. We should go back and see if there are more instances of this. We may also find that by removing some of the clutter some dependencies can also be removed entirely. Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up? -- Jeremy -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
